I provided you with the contact information of the expert you cited. Perhaps you should contact him if you're interested in the truth.
I didn't mean to infer that you did. I was just remarking about how nice it was reading something that wasn't the usual insult oriented post many subscribe to.
Thank you. I was referring to folks here who are so very sure that the technology wasn't used. I was figuring since they knew for sure, then somebody must be an expert, so I was asking for that expert to please identify themselves. I guess there are only opinions from mere mortals like myself that generate those comments. Appreciate it.
Maybe to you. But then you're not Mark Bingham. And I'm guessing you're not in sales. And Mark Bingham's Mom says that he did this on occasion. It didn't seem ludicrous to her. Is she lying? Is she "in on it" too? Has she been threatened by the government to go along with the story? What is your explanation for her thinking it was normal?
Wait. So let me get this straight. YOU make a completely bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claim you have absolutely NO EVIDENCE to back it up, then challenge people to refute it. When they do, citing the invetor of voice morphing technology, they are "pretend experts" and thus you mock them. So what the (*)(*)(*)(*) are you pretending to be? Seriously. Can you not see the hypocricy? Wait. Sorry. I forgot who I was talking to.
Well, the inventor of the technology says it wasn't used. But you choose to believe David Ray Griffin. Is he an expert on voice morphing technology? Does he know more about it than the person who invented it?
OF COURSE you don't. The hypocricy of your position makes "defending" it impossible. So once again you hide behind pretending to be insulted someone would DARE point out the utter dishonesty of your posts and tactics. BTW, technically the only tantrums here are in your posts. We respond to what you write. You respond by running away and pretending you are somehow doing it out of righteous indignation.
