Was Pope Benedict Fired by the Knights of Malta?”

“Popes do not resign because they’re getting old. If you believe that Papal Bull, I have a ‘we killed Bin Laden and threw him in the ocean’ story to sell you.” My article speculated, without much evidence, about various hypothetical reasons for the Pope’s astounding and unprecedented decision to step down.

Yesterday we learned the real reason for the Pope’s resignation: The Church has been penetrated, at its highest levels, by a homosexual embezzlement ring. According to Dr. Robert Moynihan of Inside the Vatican magazine, a secret report on the homosexual crime ring, and associated blackmail problems, was given to the Pope on December 17. This report, Dr. Moynihan tells us, “overwhelmed his spirit within him” and “made his heart desolate.” (The original source of these revelations, which Dr. Moynihan seemingly confirms, was an article in La Republica.)

Why didn’t the Pope simply fire the malefactors? Apparently, like the criminal banks that are “too big to fail,” the larcenous pederasts in the Church are “too big to fire.” In other words, the Catholic Church has been taken over by an organized crime ring of embezzlers and sexual deviants.

The Catholic Church, the largest and most powerful religious organization on earth, has long seen itself as the moral guardian of the Western world. Despite a long history of scandals, the Church has always retained its status as the source of moral authority for the world’s Catholics, who currently number 1.2 billion.

But Pope Benedict’s resignation - a tacit admission that even the absolute ruler of the church is powerless in the face of the Vatican’s “untouchable” gay crime ring - raises the ancient but always-relevant question: Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Who will guard the guardians?

The cancer of criminality and sexual deviance in the Catholic Church is symptomatic of the growing decadence that afflicts Western civilization, and pushes it toward its inevitable decline and fall. As the Chinese understand, the “mandate of heaven” - a sort of divine legitimacy bestowed on civilizations and their rulers - has been removed from the Catholic Church, the heart of that heartless world known as the West. By extension, the whole Western world has lost the mandate of heaven.


Dr. Michael Jones, a noted Catholic author who edits Culture Wars magazine, argues that sexuality has been weaponized by Zionists and freemasons and used to destroy the Christian West. The same forces, he adds, are also targeting the Muslim East. When the Israelis invade Palestine and broadcast pornography on Palestinian TV, when well-funded clandestine groups distribute pornographic DVDs in Muslim countries, and when the Rockefeller-Rothschild cabal funds such sexual liberationists as the pedophile rapist Dr. Alfred Kinsey, a “culture war” is being waged against the moral grounding that holds families and societies together, according to Dr. Jones.

The rise of sexual deviancy, and subsequent decline of Western civilization, is a problem that goes far beyond the boundaries of the Catholic Church. Just as there is an “untouchable” gay crime ring in the Vatican, a very similar criminal cabal is equally “untouchable” at the highest levels of power in the United States.

This criminal cabal was exposed in the Franklin Savings and Loan scandal, brilliantly described by journalist Nick Bryant in his book The Franklin Scandal: A Story of Powerbrokers, Child Abuse, and Betrayal. Bryant summarizes his book as “the story of a nationwide pedophile ring that pandered children to a cabal of the rich and powerful. The ring’s pimps were a pair of political powerbrokers who had access to the highest levels of our government. Nebraska legislators nearly exposed the ring in 1990, but its unveiling had the potential to produce seismic political aftershocks. The legislators’ efforts resulted in rash of mysterious deaths and the overpowering corruption of federal and local law enforcement, including the FBI, Secret Service, and Justice Department, effecting an immaculate cover-up of the trafficking network.”

Bryant’s book shows that all relevant US government agencies, as well as all significant major media outlets in the US, are controlled (or at least intimidated) by a crime network that kidnaps thousands of children and sells them as sex slaves to members of the American political and financial elite, and then uses the videos and photos for blackmail. Among the most notorious child-abusers are the two Presidents Bush.


Convincing testimony from abused children, cited by Nick Bryant, implicated President George H.W. Bush as one of the many elite Americans who enjoyed the services of child sex slaves. On June 29, 1989, the Washington Times reported this story under the screaming headline: “Homosexual prostitution inquiry ensnares VIPs with Reagan, Bush: ‘Call Boys’ took midnight tours of White House.”

Bush Jr. apparently inherited the same proclivities as his father. During the Bush II presidency, the notorious homosexual prostitute Jeff Gannon, disguised as a journalist, made several overnight stays in the White House.

The younger Bush’s sexual deviancy apparently isn’t limited to homosexuality and pedophilia. According to a report by former National Security Agency officer Wayne Madsen:

“The orders to take the sexually-oriented photos and videos (at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere), some of which involve teenage Iraqi boys and girls and sodomization by their guards, came directly from a pedophile and closeted male homosexual ring operating in the White House, according to intelligence sources. Copies of the tapes and photos were sent directly to the White House for the entertainment of senior members of the Bush White House, including officials in the Vice President’s office and the Executive Office of the President… installation of live streaming black boxes in the White House and the Eisenhower Old Executive Office Building were used to stream live video of torture sessions in Guantanamo, Cuba and Abu Ghraib to the Old Executive Office Building office of Vice President Dick Cheney’s Chief Counsel David Addington and into the White House, itself.”

Why is this gay crime ring untouchable? Apparently, it “owns” the US government by virtue of the blackmail photos and videos it holds on all major powerbrokers. (Anyone who doubts this should consult any decent biography of former FBI chief J. Edgar Hoover, who likewise “owned” the US government thanks to his collection of blackmail photos… and was himself “owned” by Mafia chief Meyer Lansky, who held a photo of Hoover in a compromising position.)

Both 2004 presidential candidates, George W. Bush and John Kerry, are members of Skull and Bones, a satanic secret society based on sexual deviance and organized crime. Bush and Kerry each, during their induction to Skull and Bones, laid naked in a coffin in front of the older Bonesmen, enjoying themselves while recounting their entire sexual histories.

The US military, too, hosts a similar crime ring. Kay Griggs, ex-wife of a Marine Colonel, has described the horrors she endured at the hands of a homosexual/rapist/pedophile ring that was just as “untouchable” as the Vatican sex mafia that brought down the Pope.

The US military’s domination by criminal sexual deviants is epitomized by the case of the notorious child molester Col. Michael Aquino. Col. Aquino, who managed to get himself expelled from the Church of Satan for being too evil, went on to beat a well-documented child abuse rap. He later became one of the US military’s most senior specialists on psychological warfare and mind control.

In another “gay mafia” scandal, David Ferrie, a CIA operative and former Catholic priest who was defrocked for pedophilia, and “gay CIA mafia” kingpin Clay Shaw, were prosecuted for the JFK assassination by New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison. Naturally, homosexual groups protested when Oliver Stone’s film JFK depicted these events accurately.


Today’s leaders of the West, in short, are virtually indistinguishable from the gang-rapists who ran Sodom and Gomorrah. And the “trickle-down” effect of elite deviance is destroying Western civilization. Today in the USA, roughly half of marriages end in divorce, and growing numbers of children - a majority in some communities - are being born out of wedlock. Drugs, crime, pornography addiction, and other vices are endemic.

The decadent West, not surprisingly, is losing its economic domination of the world. Jon Moynihan, Executive Chairman of PA Consulting Group, made a presentation at the London School of Economics earlier this year entitled “The Continued Economic Decline of the West.” Moynihan says it is “highly predictable” that Western incomes and living standards will be roughly halved during the next two decades. This unprecedented catastrophe, he writes, is virtually inevitable.

Will Pope Benedict’s resignation one day be viewed as the moment when the “mandate of heaven” passed from Christianity to Islam? Will Muslims be able to maintain their integrity and family values in the face of a morally-degraded and decadent neo-colonialism? Or will the Catholic Church recover from this potentially mortal blow, turn away from its entanglements with Zionism and freemasonry, and forge a new alliance - grounded in traditional morality - with the Muslim world?


http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/02/23/290392/decadent-west-and-rise-of-sexual-deviancy/

Some pretty powerful stuff there, not really sure how the 'Knights of Malta' come into it, but the rest is no surprise to me, or anyone with the eyes to see.

Basically, we have been usurped by beasts, paedophiles, child killers, psychopaths, and thieves.

No use changing a name here and there. They are all tainted.

 

So let's see. The Pope quits because he's old (and blind in one eye)

From that we get to Bush being gay, living standards dropping, and Muslims ruling the world. Oh, and this comes from PressTV.

I dunno, I'm thinking this should be in the Conspiracy forums.

 

Hmmmm. very interesting .


Its late , I'll think more abt it tomorrow.

cheers.

 

Don't bleeding post on the topic, if you do not like it.

Always the same with you.

Please make the next post something to do with the topic.

Don't bother with another smart arsed post, either talk about specifics, or be ignored.

Your choice.

Take responsibility man.

 

No problem.

It has been clear to me for some time that there is a global paedophile/rape/abuse ring, at the highest level, and spanning many Western countries, including the US and the UK. You should watch that vid I gave you about Jersey.

Look through some of my past threads, I have been saying this for ages. And yes, look how their sickness filters down the way. Is it any wonder that on one hand, we had a young man being threatened by the FBI with 35yrs in prison, for sharing public information, while a man that downloaded vile child porn gets a slap on the wrists.

Of course not, they are looking after the products of their sickness, they do not see it as sick, therefore, the light sentences.

Jeez, on this very forum, just a couple of weeks ago, a member (I cannot name them), stated that 'sex with children was normal'.

I never communicated again with them, after that. Nor will I. I don't debate or talk to such types.

 

Well, yeah. As it is with you. But since I have the day off, okay here's a more complete discussion on the article. Essentially the article fails on so many levels it's not even funny. To wit:

1) It assumes that the Pope was lying about his reasons for quitting. The guy is what - 85? He's in failing health? Notes published elsewhere in some recent story indicate he was tired of not being able to reform the RCC (not that I placed much hope in him being able to do much anyway) - him quitting isn't so unbelievable. So the basic premise fails Occam's Razor.

2) Your post spends a great deal of time discussing this invisible gay mafia within the government, not so much proving such exists within the RCC, it's all simple speculation by - hmm, where did this article come from? Oh yeah, the official press organ of Iran who keep arguing that Heaven's Mandate has passed from the RCC to - surprise! - Islam. Wow, big surprise there.

3) The link from the Pope quitting to a huge secret organization controlling the whole thing is spurious at best. It's nothing but speculation. It's not even news.

4) "The decadent West, not surprisingly, is losing its economic domination of the world." Well, maybe so, but this has nothing to do with the Pope quitting for either the reason he stated or some other sinister reason. Ultimately, this was merely a ruse for PressTV to make some sweeping statement about how they hope Islam will soon dominate the world by making some Rube Goldberg-like chain of arguments.

5) There is no proof that Muslims have any more integrity and family values as anyone else. Perhaps they have less. Were I really interested in doing so, I could easily keep posting news stories of Muslims Behaving Badly, as you do with Jews and the like. It can certainly be argued that the UK far more than the US seems to be facing some kind of moral crisis.

6) EDIT TO ADD: Heck, why are you of all people using an article that has as its closing statement that such mandate of heaven exists in the first place? Such an idea is antithetical to just about any post you've ever made that comes close to the subject. To a degree, posting with this article is an action that's at odds with your own stance on faith.

Bottom line: It goes from the Pope resigning to it being symptomatic of Western Civ at large to an S&L scandal to the US gov and the press controlled by an international crime cartel to the Gay Mafia to the West in decline to islam gaining the mandate of Heaven. The sheer number of non sequiturs is staggering. The whole article does not follow from its basic premise. Given that it comes from PressTV, the wishful thinking that Islam will gain said mandate probably came first, and then the writer came up with a convoluted way to justify it.

 

One other thing I should have added to the first point above:

Ratz is apparently blind in one eye. His job at this point is similar to Sisyphus pushing a rock up a hill for all eternity. He can't win, and all he''s going to accomplish is ruin his own health, what little there is of it, even more. So, he can stay at the job or retire and get free health care, free eats, free room and board, and play shuffleboard for the rest of his life. Maybe even go on a Carnival cruise if he has good life insurance.

Gee, which would any of us choose?

See, this is where the article ultimately fails. People don't always do things for sinister reasons. Sometimes they really do act out of enlightened self-interest. Especially when it's kind of obvious. But on the other hand, if all you see are conspiracies everywhere, you'll even see one in the act of a really old man doing something at 85 that most of us will do at a far younger age.

 

The knights of malta? give me a break jack. Malta?

 

they're not really from Malta...they use to run it, but they're not Maltese.

 

He's a Pope, and he will do what a Pope is supposed to do and that is to fast and pray for his Church. He has been told not to travel, which is also part of being a Pope...or at least it is now a days. Catholics want to see him, and he draws crowds of people wherever he goes. Now isn't it logical for him to want to spend the rest of his years in a monastery in Rome, as he said, and have an active Pope in office who can travel and greet his adherents?

 

It's a bit worse than that. The title of the thread asks if the Pope was fired by the Knights of Malta - and then the article itself never mentions them at all. It's mentioned in the byline of said article, but never elaborates. Extremely poor journalism.

I used to wonder where all those journalists laid off by the New York Times went. Now we know.

 

WELL SLAP ME WITH A FISH AND CALL ME SUSY, YOU DUN FIGGERRED IT OUT!

Invisible gay mafia controlling the Vatican! Of course! It's so obvious so I guess that's why nobody figured it out before now!

Quick, someone airdrop a planeload full of Penthouse and Playboy on the Vatican! We must fight fire with fire!

 

I saw two things on the Pope which were quite humorous. One was a caricature of the Vatican with someone inside screaming: "You're giving what up for lent?"

The second was a group of pictures of the Pope with his cape and everything else blowing in his face. In the last picture he was partially knocked over, and with his face in the camera said: "I quit!"

Anyway I found them funny. :

 

You should maybe listen to what Kay Griggs has to say, at least.

Still, it would mean actually listening, and why do that when you can wait until such things are 'officially admitted'.

 

What has been officially admitted is that the Pope is going to spend the few years he has in a monastery in Rome. That's it!

 

Yes.

What of them?

Four thousand Knights of Malta, heirs to one of the great orders of European chivalry of mediaeval times, and the fourth oldest religious order in the Roman Catholic Church, took over the Vatican briefly on Saturday.

Today the Knights are a unique sovereign entity in that they rule over no territory except a palace in one of Rome's smartest shopping districts, a church and an elegant villa overlooking the city.

They have observer status at the United Nations, just like the Vatican, and Pope Benedict is a member of the monastic order, having joined 15 years ago.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-21396696

- - - Updated - - -

And?

.

 

Run what? the fishing harbor?

 

Try this...https://www.google.co.uk/#hl=en&biw...v=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.&fp=52e25552b949de7b

 

Name one then?

- - - Updated - - -

Oh, new world order wannabe nobodies!?

 

Name one what??

- - - Updated - - -

I can see you must have learned all about them in three seconds.

 

So what do they run jack? The local paper round?

- - - Updated - - -

Name one maltese knight.

 

Try READING stuff.

Then try thinking.

Let me know when you have.



- - - Updated - - -

It has got NOTHING to do with being Maltese.

Right, someone else can educate you now, I have tried.

 

Thats all the relevance they have.

 

Jack, let it die. You clearly don't know anything about them. Maybe because there is nothing worth knowing. They're just some sad people that like to pretend.

 

And at this point we are literally all over the map here - and coming from me, that's saying something.

So what exactly are we discussing? Why the Pope resigned, the Knights of Malta, a secret gay ring, or the mandate of heaven? Or Kay? While her allegations are pretty shocking, she's also getting them second-hand from an alcoholic abusive husband with whom she's divorced IIRC - not exactly a witness without problems.