Was the Covid hoax really just about absentee ballot fraud?

Well theres a far higher number of Americans now vocally supporting coerced vaccination, the power elite know how many of us can be feared into martial law 'stay at home' curfews, the rich are a lot richer, their small business competition have been devastated, people love the idea of being tracked with their phones now, its acceptable now to censor social media posts that disagree with the govt... so, no, I don't think it was 'just about absentee ballot fraud'.

 

Basic principle of science

 

Would that. Be a redneck bidet?

 

Because he didn’t

He initially did not recommend them out of concern that it would restrict access for the people on the frontline and at that point we had little data on effectiveness when used by the general public

 

Awarded - three tin foil hats on the conspiracy spectrum

 

Oh for sure. The World got together in a Zoom meeting and decided to fake up a pandemic to throw a local election in America. India and Indonesia are currently loosing horrific numbers to the hoax, but they don't mind if it means Biden stays in power. They're so behind Joe, ya know. Prepared to do anything!

 

Slam dunks...

 

Yes it is

 

Curiously and as an aside I had a someone on a firearm thread try to claim the same thing about Australia's ban on automatic/semi-automatic firearms. He had claimed that bans never worked, at all, anywhere. I replied that (due to certain specific starting conditions which were definitely not relevant to the US) it had worked in Australia i.e. since the ban there had been no mass shootings (4 or more people) using the banned weapons - albeit the sample size is very small because we never had that many to begin with. The immediate response repeated like a religious mantra was 'correlation is not causation'.

Pointing out that its impossible to use item (A) to cause event (B) in circumstances where number of item (A) available for use is at or near zero just resulted in a parrot like repetition of the above and demands that I 'prove' the ban was the cause of the lack of mass shootings.

I only mention it because people fixated on a core belief will turn that scientific tenant around as a coverall defense for their stance on whatever topic if given the chance.

 

Jesus. Do we need a newly registered tin-foil hat wearing anti-vaxxer?
Mods should move this thread to the conspiracy theories subforum.
Or even better, should delete this garbage.

 

Problem is you can't stop the tinfoils from registering. All you can do is play Smokey the Bear to their blazing lunacy. Which means we all end up running from thread to thread hosing down spotfires.

 

I don't even know where to start unpacking this much Dunning-Kruger...

 

Tinfoil hat or sock-puppet?

 

The key word actually is “necessarily” and then I go on to point out that although as a general principle correlation is not causation it may be an indicator requiring further investigation and speaking of which there are some, not many but some decent research of the impact of the 1996 firearm legislation reform on murder rates in Australia

 

Lol....

Silly weather correlation is red herring.

Humans die at about the same rate from the same virus.

Japan - honest health care

US - lying Zionist Marxist kleptocratic traitors running health care

 

And those who support the Steal yell

Censor!!

Ban!!!

We cannot debate this poster, all we can do is shout down, drive bye, and whine!!!M

 

Acts like cognitive dissonance/denial.

 

You may see yourself as curious, but you don't come across that way.

These are not debates here at PF as much as they are simply discussions, and that goes for many internet sites. I cannot be the only one who participated in debates in high school and college. These discussions here are not debates.

More, I have never claimed that there was a link between the COVID outbreak and the stolen election. You somehow believe that I have, but all that illustrates is your poor reading comprehension skills.

I very much HAVE claimed that the Scamdemic was planned, and I make that claim after examining the work of David Martin, something you refuse to do, despite the link I wasted. You are scared silly of the facts he has presented and analyzed. That makes you quite typical sir, in these discussion forums. I have not ever tried to connect the stolen election and COVID, but in your tortured mind, I have.

You misrepresent what I have said, you are too intimidated by facts you find uncomfortable to examine those facts, and you expect to be taken seriously.

 

Err... no.

As per Post 3 of this thread where you state, and I quote: 'Good points raised by the OP, but given the fact that this event was planned for years in advance, it would seem the ulterior motives were many more than just ballot fraud.'

You made the claim and did not provide any links. That is the post I responded to and that is the one I asked you to substantiate. Not any other. So once again - what is your evidence?

As for the rest of your post... From the Cambridge Dictionary: (See: this is what a reference looks like. If other people can do it so can you! ) Debate: a serious discussion of a subject in which many people take part.

And do please let me know what college you went to. Because based on your contribution to this thread (and others) I really should warn people not to send their kids there.

 

Look at you two, shamefully attacking a new poster, but run crying to mods if anyone hurts your little feelings.

 

Operation Covid was indeed planned for years, and there is ample evidence for that, available to any curious reader, for a year or more. That has nothing to do with the stolen election.

I happily accept that Cambridge definition of debate. Discussions/debates which accept as facts the untruthful statements of known liars like Fauci & The Media do NOT qualify as "serious". Promoting lies told by propagandists does not qualify as a serious discussion.

I say again MONASH, if you are not willing to inform yourself on the public records of the US Patent Office as analyzed by David Martin, then YOU are not "serious". You are merely one more person that refuses to face facts.

 

Gosh... You actually posted this, and you still rail away supporting the church of AGW?

 

So that's a 'no' on the links then?

 

Plandemic II. That's the snake oil he's hawking...

 

Is that supposed to be part of 'Operation COVID'? Cause I'm losing track.