Watch 27 years of 'old' Arctic ice melt away in seconds

Did you ask this question?

What are temperatures doing to the planet as a whole?

I answered it and you have no response because you have no evidence

 

so you're conceding this discussion. you can't state what the temperature is doing to the planet as a whole, nor can you explain the dangers of sea ice.

Thanks for playing. I realize when there is no information to support your argument, you just can't produce a response.

 

I provided tons of evidence as anyone can see. I accept your defeat

 

Not even applicable to the discussion, but then I expect nothing less from you. BTW, computer models and conjecture are not evidence of anything.

 

That's a logical fallacy

 

My God you don't even have a clue what a logical fallacy is. Do you enjoy showing off how little you know?

 

Logical fallacy....logical fallacy.....logical fallacy.....LOL

 

I guess the answer to my question is yes, wholeheartedly.

 

Well we know I know tons more than you about this subject.....so where does that put you? LOL

 

Mouse in your pocket? Hope it is smarter than you.

 

I know in your mixed up world you think you did. However, the reality is you haven't. You should learn that just cause you say it, doesn't make it evidence. And, when presenting links to an argument, you should read the content of the material to ensure it captures the data relative to the argument. So when talking sea ice avoid ice shelves as a source of evidence, cause, that ain't sea ice. I'm just saying.

 

You asked a question I answered it with TONS of evidence.

 

or not!

 

If you can not read that is not my problem.....though it explains why you are a denier! LOL

 

I can read just fine, you I guess not so much. Again, your link was to ice shelves in the Antarctic, not sea ice. And still nothing on the temperature as a whole thingy. Nothing. So, or not.

 

NASA AGW effects page....for the second time

 

it's a page, can't you copy and paste the excerpt from the link that backs your statement? I mean, I read it and it is antarctic ice shelves, not sea ice, so bring up the paragraph that supports your claim. It's simple, it's called an excerpt to show me what you are referencing!!!!!!!!!!

 

How much evidence do you need?

https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/science/indicators/snow-ice/sea-ice.html

http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/reportcard/sea_ice.html

https://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/

 

and so? I still don't know what the point is your trying to make. Sea ice does not melt and cause more water in the sea. So I'm still trying to grasp at what you're trying to say. Please, can't you just write your point? I see that sea ice extent went down a bit. so what?

 

It is one....just one ....of the indicators of AGW.

 

Computer projections and conjecture are not indicators or evidence of AGW.

 

Good thing I never mentioned any of those. LOL

 

In hoosier's very limited worldview, no part of the globe exists except for northern Europe and other cooler climates.

The tropics that would be devastated by warming? Just brown people, so deniers don't care about those millions of deaths. Being a rather genocidal lot, they rather look forward to it.

 

Then you must not be aware that is what all of this is based on.

- - - Updated - - -

Thanks for showing how little you know about this, like Vegas. You are not aware that warming affects the equatorial regions the least amount, but then you needed to use the race card because you have nothing else. Sad and immature.

 

As usual your posts are devoid of any evidence. LOL