We Might Have Another Smoking Gun in the Biden Corruption Probe

You do realize that you finally admit that Trump is guilty of nothing.

 

That is not what Robert Mueller said.

 

'Fraid not.

 

Whut?


Are you for real?

 

every thing I said is fact

 

That is not what Robert Mueller said in his report. Yes, there was a lot of hyperpartisan insinuations on both sides of the aisle, but the fact of the matter is that it was confirmed two Russian agents did meet with the Trump Campaign in mid-summer 2016 and again in December 2016. What was not known, and Robert Mueller did not press the issue on Trump on how much he knew or not. Additionally, even a Republican Senate investigative committee said that the FBI had every right to investigate the matter when it came to possible Russian agents attempting to meet with the Presidential nominee. That had great national security concerns.

But if it was a hoax, and Trump knew there was nothing to be afraid of, then why did Robert Mueller spend 60 pages in his report in which he described Donald Trump and some of the members of his staff trying to influence the report to make it go away? That type of action is not an action of an innocent man, is it?

 

Senate committees don't have juries.

As far as their findings, that's public domain, since you choose to ignore it's existence, doesn't make Trump innocent.

 

Not tax evasion under 7201. Even though some 150 transactions were flagged by the GOP, they still have not proven one iota of their claims. In fact, they are making the very same mistakes the Steele Dossier did, unfortunately.

 

Maybe just in case of an Emergency...
Which would have nothing to do with "Hunter's business"...
Sometimes people have NON-BUSINESS RELATED reasons to talk to their parents...
Happens every day...

 

And yet Mueller said it did not exonerate Trump from the affair. Again, there was no direct evidence, but there was suspicions given that two of Trump's closest advisors had connections with Russia and Putin specifically. One was named Manafort and the other was named Page.

In summary, here are the key findings of the report:

• n 2015 and 2016, Michael Cohen pursued a hotel/residence project in Moscow on behalf of Trump while he was campaigning for President. Then-candidate Trump personally signed a letter of intent.
• Senior members of the Trump campaign, including Paul Manafort, Donald Trump, Jr., and Jared Kushner took a June 9, 2016, meeting with Russian nationals at Trump Tower, New York, after outreach from an intermediary informed Trump, Jr., that the Russians had derogatory information on Clinton that was “part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump.”
• Beginning in June 2016, a Trump associate “forecast to senior [Trump] Campaign officials that WikiLeaks would release information damaging to candidate Clinton.” A section of the Report that remains heavily redacted suggests that Roger Stone was this associate and that he had significant contacts with the campaign about Wikileaks.
• The Report described multiple occasions where Trump associates lied to investigators about Trump associate contacts with Russia. Trump associates George Papadopoulos, Rick Gates, Michael Flynn, and Michael Cohen all admitted that they made false statements to federal investigators or to Congress about their contacts. In addition, Roger Stone faces trial this fall for obstruction of justice, five counts of making false statements, and one count of witness tampering.
• The Report contains no evidence that any Trump campaign official reported their contacts with Russia or WikiLeaks to U.S. law enforcement authorities during the campaign or presidential transition, despite public reports on Russian hacking starting in June 2016 and candidate Trump’s August 2016 intelligence briefing warning him that Russia was seeking to interfere in the election.
• The Report raised questions about why Trump associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia.

Source

If there are questions about why Trump's associates and then-candidate Trump repeatedly asserted Trump had no connections to Russia, the evidence is clear that his associates, as advisors did, and therefore Trump in which he had a proposal of the intent of a hotel in Russia, Wikileaks informing the campaign that they will release bad info on his opposition, and the constant lying about everything that was going on. If a person who is being questioned lies, that is a bad sign that not only that person is not telling the truth, but they are also having something to hide from investigators.

 

You beat me to it.

And it's John Solomon to boot.

 

Great...
Let them "investigate" (and chase down every endless rabbit hole)...
BUT, until anything actually CONCRETE shows up...

 

Take the facts of leave them. It's what John Durham concluded in his 300 page report. There was NO basis, never a basis for an investigation into the Trump campaign. Furthermore, it was Hillary Clinton who sought out information from the Russians to smear Trump.

 

That SHOULD Be:
"Trump Has Been Found guilty of nothing"...
^Just wait until the TRIAL...

 

Your need to constantly giggle has no bearing on what I wrote.

 

Especially since it's a John Solomon story,eh?
We know damn well if true he would have published it back in 2019 when he made the call.

Funny though that Solomon doesn't have an audio of Joe answering the phone, not that that would be proof as there are voice impersonators.

One more time.
John Solomon.

 

Ok...
Let's try this again:

^That SHOULD Be:
"Trump Has Been Found guilty of nothing"...
^Just wait until the TRIAL...

 

John Solomon the political operative who's still trying to pass himself off as a journalist.

 

No kidding...
John Solomon? Really? Totally LMAO!
His M.O.
magnifying small scandals, creating fake controversy, and advancing conspiracy theories.
John Solomon = someone who no one takes seriously and has Zero Credibility...
Solomon says...
Solomon claims...
Conclusion: This Entire Bullshit Story has less credibilty than a Bigfoot Sighting...
Poor Delusional Tinfoil Hat must be really starved for attention?

 

The thread is about a phone for Joe paid for by Hunter's business associates that was found by reviewing Hunter's laptop, again do you still believe Joe had no knowledge of Hunter's business? and do you believe the laptop was Hunter's? Should be easy answer for someone truthful.

 

The Treasury should have investigated those flags. Just getting that info from Treasury was difficult.

 

The phone number for Joe’s satellite phone came from Hunter’s laptop. Speaking of laptops Hunter is in court again. He is being sued for defamation by the computer repair shop owner. I don’t see much on that from MSM.

 

Well, we appear to have along wait ahead of us.....

 

Joe had his own satellite phone as VP. Problem was that phone provided by tax payers was being recorded for VP archival purposes so of course he would not have used that.

 

For at least a year and a half Joe will constantly have to answer questions about his involvement with Hunter’s business and receiving millions from foreign countries.