well known homosexual director accused of assulting 15 year old boy in his mansion

This has got to be one of the most retarded, dishonest arguments that I have with people. The homosexual agenda and it's proponents are so INCREDIBLY dishonest it border on psychosis.

Your "logic" is, by ANY standards, ludicrous.

Here let's show the absurdity of your logic.

What age does the homosexual's partner/victim have to be for the homosexual to no longer be considered a pedophile, but a homosexual? 12? 14? 16? 18?

Let's say the homosexuals victim/partner is two weeks prior to that age... is the homosexual no longer a homosexual, but a pedophile?

Let's say that the homosexual was sexually molesting a 10 year old. Let's say that he CONTINUES to have sex with that child until the victim/partner becomes 18. Does the homosexual go from a pedophile, back to a homosexual again?

 

What are you even talking about? They can't get married in every state right now. And what are you talking about with excluding all other sexual preferences?

I love how you completely avoid the fact that you claim to be totally cool with gay people but then point out that you're against gay marriage.

 

Isn't it usually hetero directors/producers using the 'casting couch' though?

Hollywood is well-known to be a cesspool of sexual depravity.

 

Never had anal sex with a woman?

 

Yes they can. Its amazing you didn't know that.

Just what is says. Let me explain so its easier to understand. The main arguments for gay marriage is that marriage is a "right" or "people should get married because they love each other".

You use those moronic general arguments and there isn't a sexual preference out there from polygamy to pedophilia who would not make the exact same claim. So I ask again, what is your argument to force states to accept 2 person adult homosexual marriage only while excluding all other sexual preferences that seek the same acknowledgment? Don't worry when you figure out you can't do it because no one on your side has ever been able to.

I dont care how homosexuals live their lives no. I care when they try to force the state to pretend their relationship is equal to heterosexuality when heterosexuality is genetic and homosexuality is not and as I said any sexual preference can use their exact arguments to seek state recognition of their sexual preference as well.

- - - Updated - - -

Still waiting on that scientific book on anatomy that lists the anal cavity as a sex organ.

 

Oh, is this the mind numbingly dumb argument of, "derp, gays have the same marriage rights as we do - they can marry someone of the opposite sex!" I'm not even going to dignify that dumb game of semantics with a counter-argument. You know it's a dumb statement just meant to avoid the issue.

Strawman. Gay people should be able to get married because they're consenting adults. I couldn't care less if more than two people married each other, but that does present some legal issues different than a two-person marriage, and that would need to be worked out. What is your argument that gay people SHOULDN'T get married? No one on your side has ever given a scientifically accurate or logical reason why not.

Right, except the whole marriage thing, which is a huge part or potential part of many gay people's lives.

Really? Because over 1500 species have been observed partaking in homosexual behavior. And there's this:


http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...finally-unlocked-puzzle-of-why-people-are-gay

And how would a sexual orientation deserve less respect and less rights even if it wasn't biological? What do you care if it's a choice or not? If being black was a choice, would that mean that black people should still be slaves?

And here's a question, if it's a choice, that means you're telling me that you could choose to find men sexually attractive and enjoy gay sex. That's what you're telling me. You sure you want to take that stance?

Again, the argument is not simply "cuz they love each other," and you're being dishonest by framing it in such a simplistic way. Children cannot consent to sex or marriage with an adult. There are actual proven consequences for that child, whereas you cannot come up with a single negative aspect of gay marriage. All you have is your ignorant and unscientific claim that it's not natural, as if that even matters.

It's pathetic that I had to drag this attitude out of you while you pretended that there was no ulterior motive for putting the sexual orientation in the title. Anyone could spot it from a mile away, so I don't know why you pretend otherwise.

 

Notice how he has to put a scantily clad woman in his av? I mean, would't want anyone to mistake him for gay, right? The ones who scream the loudest...

 

Of course you care how homosexuals live their lives- you want to prevent them from being legally married.

Marriage has nothing to do with genetics- that is your own made up qualifier. You just want to deny same gender couples the same legal rights and protections as my wife and I enjoy.

I think that is wrong.

 

But what evidence is there that Michael jackson was actually guilty? The fact that michael jackson paid people to end the lawsuit doesn't mean that he was guilty. That's circumstantial evidence that could be interperted either way.

 

Gay marriage is not legal in every state.

 

Oh he is going by the same logic that failed for Virginia when they argued that no one was prevented from getting married in Virginia by the laws against mixed race marriages- they just weren't allowed to marry people of different races(which really only applied to whites marrying blacks).

\

 

Its a lot of histrionics. (*)(*)(*)(*)ing 14 year olds is NOT paedophilic. It is imappropriate and not very proper behavior but it isn;t damaging like having sexual relationships with a prepupescent. I was having sex at 15...and so what?

Time people worried about more important (*)(*)(*)(*).

 

Um, 15 is considered a child in all US states, so yes, the guy is a pedophile.

There are no special rules for gays... yet.

 

er no..pedophile is NOT the same a someone who is having underage sex. Pedophilia is a psyhcological condition which means you are attracted to prepubesecents. It is normal for a man to be attracted to pubescent females of 13/14+.

We set rules on limits for sex for other reasons. US laws are absurdly high.

 

Illegal is illegal... looks like gays in Europe are on the road to legalizing pedophila anyway.

"The lawsuit cites the U.S. age of consent of 18, rather than the British, which, for gay men, was 21 until 1994, when it became 18; and then 16—equalized, after much campaigning by gay rights activists, with the heterosexual age of consent—in 2001. The lawsuit does not make clear the year or years the alleged offenses took place. A spokeswoman for Herman declined on Sunday to clarify this."

http://drudgegae.iavian.net/r?hop=h...inger-faces-new-teen-sex-assault-lawsuit.html

 

Illegal doesn;t make it Paedophilia it just makes it....illegal. I don;t think anywhere in Europe is going to legalise Gay sex with prepubescents perhaps you can link to any information that demonstrates otherwise.

18 is far too old.

 

16 is far too young and sex with a 15 yo is sex with a child -- no matter what you call it.

 

And completely legal in some states

http://www.webistry.net/jan/consent.html

I absolutely agree that men shouldn't be having sex with minors. But according to some states- such as Idaho(14), and according to your definition, it is perfectly legal to have sex with a child.

It is a state by state issue.

 

Doesnt matter. When pervs are successful in getting the age down to 12, it'll still be sex with a child. Guess its OK with most men... as long as its not THEIR kid being taken advantage of by a grown man.

 

You are not Physically a child at 15.

- - - Updated - - -

Some 12 year olds are Children. Whch European countries are brining down the age of consent to 12?

WHy is that the American states that have the most cpnservative attitudes to sex education have the highest teen pregnancy rates?

 

15 year olds are still children. Just because they've passed puberty doesnt make them adults, emotionally. We're supposed to be humans, not animals. Of course with some, its hard to tell the difference.

 

Only legally in some countries. They are not physically children

Humans are animals. People mature at different rates. You do not suddenly mature on your 18th birthday.

WHy do you think that 14 and 15 year olds cannot cope emotionally with having sex?

 

Obviously, you dont have children

 

As a father, I would never say it is 'okay'

I am pointing out that in several American states, they have chosen to make the age of consent 14 or 15 years old- and I would agree- I would call those children. They also allow them to marry- hence several American states allow children to marry.

And also treat them as adults when it comes to serious crimes.

 

Like that is an argument.