When we ramped up to full massacre speed, we usually refer to those we want dead by harsh nicknames. The right wing castigates Obama for not calling Islamics RADICAL. Is RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISM REALLy what you WANT to call them? We did have some good ones picked out last time we slaughtered them. Towel skulls, or similar. I don't think humans are capable of killing en masse, unless they insult and dehumanize them first. So, should the United States be readying to kill RADICAL ISLAMIC TERRORISTS, by naming them something bad? An epithet? This is rhetorical, DO NOT CALL THIS FLAMEBAITING. IT IS PERTINENT TO hUMAN NATUre. Or has PC ruined a good tradition?