I'm not stuck anywhere. In a discussion, both sides ask, and answer questions. You and Bobbi have refused to answer questions. Until you start answering them, I am not interested in any of your silly videos.
Translation: I can't agree with Gamolon because I'll look silly and I can't go against him either so I'd better avoid addressing the issue. Your credibility is shot.
LOLOLOL You don't translate very well either. I didn't watch the video, and have no intention of doing so, until you and Bobbi start answering questions.
You're behaving like a checkmated sophist. A patriotic American in denial would have slinked away by now. http://www.whale.to/b/sweeney.html (excerpt) ------------------------------------- 6) Artificial Emotions. An odd kind of 'artificial' emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and unacceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their rebuttal. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the 'image' and are hot and cold with respect to pretended emotions and their usually more calm or unemotional communications style. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to 'act their role in character' as well in a communicationsmedium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth, or simply give up. ------------------------------------- The fact that you look silly doesn't even faze you. You only care whether you get paid.
Hey Shinebox... Please address post #545. (2:25 time mark) Is the flash to the right of the the plane, or in line with the plane?
it doesn't matter ... many factors come into play here ... you claimed this as your proof of no hijackers ... how do you answer that? ... yes, that is a question for you Scott ... please answer in your own words ... if you answer with a video, I will direct an energy beam at your Mom's basement and turn your Hot Pockets into dripping metal ...
A passenger plane would not be able to fire anything that would cause that flash so it has to be a military plane. Now, do you agree with Gamolon on the location of the flash? (post #545) http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/what-truthers-believe.532027/page-28#post-1069833464
Scott isn't even a real troofer ... he's pay for click video spammer ... Bob has bunker mentality and tries to use psychology as an aversion to answering questions even though he "believes" that psychology is a pseudoscience ... he bitches about my use of the term troofer incessantly yet deploys the OCT apologist/defender/**** me sideways in damn near every post ... he is clearly a hypocrite with an overwhelming agenda ... no education in the sciences ... relies on conjecture and anomalies ... constantly posts soundbites while removing the context ... ( see his constantly spammed facts of 9/11) ... and now both of these tools are back at old debunked Avery clown shoe material ... you can't script this BS ... how out of touch are troofers? ... what is sad is they haven't a clue of how out of touch they are with reality ... having said that, I am not sure that any of the troofers here even believe in their own BS ... just too much evidence they so easily dismiss ...
I already said it doesn't matter ... Gamolon has his own interpretation of the flash ... physics question for you Scott ... relative to the face of the tower hit, what was the angle of impact? ... please just answer the question without aid of videos ...
You're avoiding my question. Do you agree with Gamolon when he says that the flash is not to the right of the plane, but in line with the nose? (post #545) http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/what-truthers-believe.532027/page-28#post-1069833464 I say the nose of the plane is inside the building. What do you say? About ninety degrees vertical and about eighty degrees horizontal.
no I don't actually ... but it doesn't matter as the flash proves nothing in regards to your claim that this is proof of no hijackers where did you get this math? ... (video expected) ... can you at least agree in simple terms that the "alleged" aircraft was pushing right against the face of side it hit? ... okay ... I have answered your question ... will you answer mine? ...
No you haven't. Here's a link to the post with the question. (post #545) http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/what-truthers-believe.532027/page-28#post-1069833464 Any ten-year-old can see that you didn't answer the question. The viewers are watching and judging and you look really silly now.
... followed by a whole lot of worthless horse caca I won't dignify by quoting except this part: Exactly Shiner, I post the facts of 9/11, you post "troofer", which means what I said above. It's about time you unwittingly acknowledged that in the middle of a bunch of drivel. And what's most telling is that you can't honestly dispute any of it. Which is why you resort to silliness (i.e. "troofer"). No "psychology" is required to analyze your mentality, it is extreme confusion you only know how to deal with by never addressing it and trying to cover up by posting this kind of childish diatribe. What it comes down do is you know you've been deceived by the US government with respect to 9/11 but you're here nearly 24/7 attacking those who expose it for what it is as some sort of retaliatory defense mechanism on your part because you want so hard for the OCT to be true because you're terrified to acknowledge it isn't even close to true. And no one needs to be a shrink to be able to analyze you, the APA scammers found an appropriate label to describe your mentality, COGNITIVE DISSONANT, it's really easy for me and I only took one course in psychology back in the day. To be sure, your fear and silly insults won't ever deter me from posting and at times repeating every opportunity I get. But I guess you know that so you're going to have to live with your nightmare.
sorry for your misinterpretation Bob ... I'm exposing you and your ilk for the cranks that you are ... it's mind boggling to me that you can't see that ... nightmare? ... hardly ... clinch your pillow tight Bobby ...
Unfortunately the parts said back in times of the Bicentennial weren't said well enough for anything to be done to believe otherwise......
Please address this post of mine properly. (post #559) http://www.politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/what-truthers-believe.532027/page-28#post-1069833959 Please say whether you agree with Gamolon when he said the flash was in line with the nose of the plane. Flashes Before the Planes Hit the World Trade Center. (2:25 time mark)
