Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Where is the proof that the airliners existed at all?

Discussion in '9/11' started by genericBob, Oct 26, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Page 6 of 15
  1. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    It only violates your understanding off those laws, and if you think no planes were involved in 9/11 then your understanding of those laws cannot be very good.
     
    cjnewson88, Jan 7, 2015
    #126
  2. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you totally buy it, that is the wing shaped gashes in WTC 1 & 2
    and the whole Pentagon fiasco + the crash in Shanksville and YOU
    do not see anything at all amiss about any of these 4 alleged airliner crashes?

    really?
     
    genericBob, Jan 7, 2015
    #127
  3. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Nope, none. And I fly planes for a living, so probably know a bit more about it than you.
     
    cjnewson88, Jan 7, 2015
    #128
  4. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    & I see by your sig line that you believe "FLT77" was a real hijacked airliner crashed into the PENTAGON

    Thank you ever so much for your opinion.
     
    genericBob, Jan 7, 2015
    #129
  5. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    No, his sig offers you 100 points of evidence that AA77 hit the Pentagon. Why do you take issue with that? Isn't examination of the evidence the reason we are here? I have found CJ Newson's Blog invaluable as a resource.

    CJ, I hope you don't mind me posting a link to the blog. Great material btw!

    http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.com.au/
     
    Blues63, Jan 7, 2015
    #130
  6. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Feel free to Blue, and thanks :)
     
    cjnewson88, Jan 7, 2015
    #131
  7. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Have you seen the Purdue University simulation?

    [video=youtube_share;cddIgb1nGJ8]http://youtu.be/cddIgb1nGJ8[/video]

    Oddly enough, the faculty at Purdue didn't share your incredulity.
     
    Blues63, Jan 7, 2015
    #132
  8. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,960
    Likes Received:
    1,907
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yeh alexander confronted them about it and you know what you get? That is aside from the data is secret?

    [​IMG]
     
    Kokomojojo, Jan 8, 2015
    #133
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,960
    Likes Received:
    1,907
    Trophy Points:
    113
    now find some bonafide truth.
     
    Kokomojojo, Jan 8, 2015
    #134
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,960
    Likes Received:
    1,907
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I thought bob was pretty darn good at physics/engineering, but if he doesnt feel like messing with it.......I'm your huckleberry

    [​IMG]

    I love messing with it.
     
    Kokomojojo, Jan 8, 2015
    #135
  11. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    What a bizarre and stupid post. Have you anything of merit that might discount the Purdue simulation?

    - - - Updated - - -

    Are you a troll? What a silly post. C.J. Newson has done some good work on this subject, so have some respect and acknowledge his efforts.
     
    Blues63, Jan 8, 2015
    #136
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ahhh,I see you've met koko.....he also thinks electricity isn't energy
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jan 8, 2015
    #137
  13. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Really?
     
    Blues63, Jan 8, 2015
    #138
  14. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    <Sigh> really.
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jan 8, 2015
    #139
  15. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    I think of you as 'The Breaker'. Nice avatar.
     
    Blues63, Jan 8, 2015
    #140
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Rule .303!
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jan 8, 2015
    #141
  17. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Our koko also once pulled this stunner too..

    [​IMG]

    He's best left on ignore.
     
    cjnewson88, Jan 8, 2015
    #142
  18. AboveAlpha

    AboveAlpha Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2013
    Messages:
    30,284
    Likes Received:
    613
    Trophy Points:
    83
    OK....despite the FACT that the Towers did not collapse in the manner that a Controlled Demolition would have caused them to collapse...and despite the FACT that it would be IMPOSSIBLE for people not to notice the hundreds upon hundreds of men that would be needed to place such charges....and despite the FACT that such charges would have had to be placed in thousands of spots that would have required drilling and tearing down of walls and areas just so that they could be placed...and despite the FACT that it is easily apparent by anyone with knowledge of Controlled Demolition of buildings that the looking at the video of the buildings collapse details that demolitions were NOT used...answer this question.....

    WHY.....would the U.S. Government do this...want to do this...as the result of doing this lost any entity that might be lobbying for this to happen LOST MONEY IN THE EXTREME!!???

    AboveAlpha
     
    AboveAlpha, Jan 8, 2015
    #143
  19. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    This is precisely why I label the Controlled Demolition hypothesis as implausible, for it would have been logistically impossible to implement such a moronic plan without anyone noticing. Furthermore, there was no actual benefit from such an outrageous and illogical plan, the US had already enough reason to go after OBL in Afghanistan without staging such stupid plan, so the 'pretext for war' hypothesis is specious.
     
    Blues63, Jan 8, 2015
    #144
  20. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Right and the major feature of a controlled demolition is the fact that demolition is COMPLETE.
    in controlled demolitions that are botched jobs, & the demolition is NOT COMPLETE, we see then that to achieve complete demolition it requires a certain level of precision in the operation, the theory that just by chance, the alignment of forces came together in just the proper manner to cause complete demolition is rather far-fetched to say the least.

    Arguments about HOW it was done notwithstanding, we see very clearly WHAT was done.
     
    genericBob, Jan 8, 2015
    #145
  21. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    To my way of thinking, that smacks of jumping to irrational conclusions that do NOT acknowledge the building methods as a contributing factor to the collapses.

    If it is clear, why is there still debate about it 13 years after the fact?
     
    Blues63, Jan 8, 2015
    #146
  22. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Psychological warfare!
     
    genericBob, Jan 9, 2015
    #147
  23. Blues63

    Blues63 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2014
    Messages:
    1,161
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Gender:
    Male
    Oh come on, Bob, you don't really believe that, do you?
     
    Blues63, Jan 10, 2015
    #148
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why not? He believes every other scenario thrown at him,beside the truth
    ,that is.
     
    LoneStrSt8, Jan 10, 2015
    #149
  25. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do YOU really and truly believe the story about those 19 radical Arabs is the TRUTH?
     
    genericBob, Jan 10, 2015
    #150
Page 6 of 15

Share This Page