Why Are Progressive Men Intimidated By Conservative Women?

I suppose it depends if a Tradition becomes a "moral".

 

If you call rubbing the truth in the faces of Progressive-Leftists trolling then okay. Their despicable nature is so repulsive im not surprised they will do and say anything to deny acknowledging it.

 

I love modern times because hot chics don't mind inboxing me cute pics of them just being themselves.

 

That is an interesting way to look at it, the feminist created the effeminate progressive man and now has abandoned them for a more domineering lesbian woman to fill that role.

So progressive men are intimidated by conservative women because if they don't act like men, they no longer have the arms of a feminist to come back to.

 

A little too confusing for me to have to sort out for now, but living in a state of confusing sexual identity, the progressives both male and female have created a gigantic personal problem that only they have the means to correct if they so wish.

 

Tell it to this guy.

 

I am still trying to find nice girls of morals in modern times.

 

this!

the modern younger male (under 50) is FAR more masculine than any of the younger males in the past several decades, actually, so there goes that theory.

as I so often seem to need to repeat here, the idealised 1950's male that so many religious right seem to believe was the pinnacle of all things male, would have to be one of the wettest periods in recent history for masculinity. those poor blokes were absolutely hammered by their womenfolk. sent out the door in neatly pressed strides, hair parted ever-just-so and creamed into permanent immobility, clean handkerchief in top pocket, shoes shined, packed lunch in otherwise empty briefcase. sent out the door like 8 year olds going to primary school by a constantly monitoring she-wolf. what little time he had away from her 'ministrations', he spent at her whim, sanitizing the house and yard lest the neighbours sneer.

meanwhile, I suspect that today's liberal male doesn't so much fear conservative women, as find them a little dull and short on brains

 

enough said

 

You're begging the question here. Has it been established that progressive men are, in fact, intimidated by conservative women?

 

of course they're not, we're just playing along with the fantasy life of conservatives. they like to imagine that regular folk FEAR things like guns and dimwitted plain girls

 

No it is not. Our lives belong either to our Creator or to the god of this world; and obviously those who are content to be unwitting vassals of the latter will bequeath to their descendants a heritage which is increasingly impoverished.

Your idea of masculinity is disgracefully shallow.

If that were the case, among other things, the increasing tendency among urban men would be to sleep only with women they're married to, and I'm aware of no such indications.

 

do you REALLY believe that infidelity in married men is some new thing? really truly? if you had the slightest clue you'd know that the concept of fidelity (on the part of men) is itself, very new, and is peculiar to only some cultures.

as regards who's shallow and who isn't - tell us that you consider both the long haired, bearded, bare footed, tattooed urban hippy, and the neatly pressed, clean shaven, buttoned up man in a grey suit to be moral equals. go on, tell us.

 

Marry a filipino... I had completely given up on American women - they're defective in just about every way... so I thought about just going bachelor the rest of my life.

Probably would have stayed single, but I met my wife thru happenstance... and she is so NOT American - that I decided to get hitched again. There's no comparison - I know a lot of filipino women, you'd count yourself lucky.

Best advice?? run like hell away from American and European women... every once in a while you'll find a good one, but they're so few, the search could kill you before you found a good one.

 

Since I clearly never implied anything of the sort, I'd say the question is idiotic. Wouldn't you?

If you had the slightest clue about what fidelity is, you'd understand that it is independent of all cultures.

I've already given you way more truth than you can handle, obviously.

 

I will keep that in mind.

 

there are MANY polygamous cultures in the world, both now and in history. there has never been a time in history in any culture, wherein men were expected to remain faithful to their wife throughout life - until relatively recently. if some men where, it was probably not by choice, but more a factor of poverty than lack of desire. you 1950's worshippers are clueless.

 

interesting. every Filipino 'wife' I know is an absolute ballbreaker. ambitious, bossy, and untiring in their efforts to goad their men into working harder and longer to keep their families back home in a manner they'd llike to become accustomed to. I LOVE them for it, too. these losers who 'can't find a decent woman' at home (ie, can't get anyone to put up with them because they're unattractive (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s, uneducated, poor, overweight and either a smoker or a drinker) deserve everything they get

 

Not a syllable of this is compelling to anyone who isn't a bloody moron, hth.

 

I think you're pandering to a stereotype - trust me, I know a lot of filipino women. They do congregate a lot, I give 'em that, lol... my personal experience, and the experience of the husbands and wives I know personally is not that at all. Great wives, beautiful women... never had a single problem with my current wife. We have two young kids, we never fight... life is very good for us.

Fought like cats and dogs with my first wife... everything was a battle - especially money. Good grief, 20 years of that crap and enough is enough. My ex-wife and I are good friends to this day, she's a good friend, a lousy wife.

 

and yet you persist with this rose tinted view of some golden age of male fidelity.

- - - Updated - - -

possibly I am stereotyping, but it's what I see. and I see alot of it.

 

So you're cool with coercing your religion onto others

The thread was about masculine pastimes/actions. If I were talking about what makes a man a man I'd go into things like mateship, bringing your kids up well, honesty, loyalty, liberty, etc.

Masculinity is more than just your interpretation of your Priest's interpretation of your Denomination's interpretation of Christian monogamy.

 

Considering who the right wing chooses as heroes, I wonder whether any of them have a bloody clue what real manhood is all about.

 

Well lets see here, right wingers could consider Abe Lincoln a hero for having snuffed out slavery and having won the civil war, and or Eisenhower for his military acumen in leading and directing the D-Day assault, and or a Ronald Reagan for having snuffed out the communist threat of the former Soviet Union---to name just three. Now, on the other hand, I would be remiss if I didn't give equal praise to three of your fearless liberals for their contributions to America.

First we have jimmy carter who as president gave us the new term called the 'misery index' which basically measured his economic success by assigning it with a letter grade of an F-, and as such has been given the title as America's worst president with obummer right on his heels vying for the top spot--or the bottom spot as would be the case. Then they have FDR who for some 8 years plus gave America an average unemployment rate somewhere around 16%. Then they have the American liberal's all time favorite 21st century messianic hero obummer who after nearly 4 1/2 years has managed to divide America, to maintain a high unemployment rate, to amass a nearly $17 trillion dollar debt, to scare businesses to lay off or develop overseas businesses to offset his tax and regulations agenda, to reject opening an oil line that would create thousands of new jobs, to recklessly spend huge amounts of $$ on failed green energy companies, to saddle us with the money taxing monstrosity known as obummercare, to pit whites against blacks--poor against the rich, and to favor multiculturalism over traditions and freebie entitlements over a desirable work ethic...etc...etc..

 

You were doing okay until you got to old Jelly-brain. He did not bring the Soviet union down. It was already collapsing. He just made the situation worse by undermining Gorby so that the Communists were replaced by the Russian Mafia and the kakiokrats.

FDR and Obama both got handed (*)(*)(*)(*) sandwiches. I blame Hoover and Bush the Lesser and that orange-skinned twit from Ohio.