Why are white people pro-diversity?

I don't know about either. If that was really the case I have to wonder why both the Arabs and the Chinese stagnated while the Europeans leaped ahead, in spite of the shackles of superstition imposed by Christianity.

 

There is no proof that Africans were always Black.
There is also no absolute proof that we all came from Africa.
That is a lot of Politically Correct B.S.
Truth is that no one knows where we all came from or how we got where we are.

Fact remains that the different races are differently talented. Therefore they are "color coded".

So why is it that Europeans became so scientifically advanced while everyone else stagnated or regressed?
Why didn't those Chinese advance even further?
Do you think that today's Arabs are the same people as they were over 1000 years ago? If so why do they need white man's technology to build their cities?

 

BS.

We may not have photos, but as long as we have had records, people from Africa have always been described as having dark skin. It also would not make much sense for them not to evolve to have darker skin.

To sit there and deny the fossil record is the height of ignorance. We came from Ethiopia. That is a fact.

Europeans used to be primitive savages while the Asians, Persians, Arabs and Egyptians surpassed them. The Chinese used to have the most advanced civilization on earth. It simply shows there is no one superior group of humans, we have all had our turn at different times. Egypt, Babylon, Persia, Greece, China, India, Mongolia, Mexico, Rome, Arabia, Spain, Britain, the United States - shall I go on?

 

There is definitive Genetic Proof our ancient ancestors were Black as Humanity originated in Africa.

This is not a theory but a FACT.

AboveAlpha

 

Well people are like dogs. Each breed has different traits.

Sure, but I like the diversity. I prefer certain kinds.

 

Two Khanty women in Man uskve nomad camp, Berezovsky, Khanty-Mansia, Russia

Most of the Finno-Ugric speaking populations possess amalgamation of West and East Eurasian gene pools supporting the idea of mixed origins in these modern populations. Haplogroup NO of the Finno-Ugric peoples and their descendants spread from Northern China about 12,000–14,000 years ago. Haplogroup N is a descendant of Haplogroup NO and it is the most common haplogroup among the Finns (60%) and it can also be found at high frequencies in Russia. The Ainu in Japan are thought to be distantly related to the the Finno-Ugric peoples with their genetic and linguistic ties and they are known to possess some Caucasian features.

 

People are not like dogs at all. Dogs have been genetically manipulated, humans are a hodge-podge. We're genetically all over the place, like any other species. Each gene creates different traits, and there's a bazillion different combos each producing a different individual human. Trust me, getting rid of one skin colour is literally eliminating a couple genes, and superficial ones at that. Not much diversity lost there. Even if everyone on Earth was black, for example, literally the only diversity we'd lose is in skin colour and like I said, it doesn't matter.

The only difference is that non-physical differences are not as apparent and obvious, so people simply would seem more similar when in every way except skin colour they're still as different as before.

I mean I guess if you really like light skin over dark skin for some irrational reason I guess I can't do much about that.

 

Dog breeds have different temperaments. Same thing with human races. Think of it this way. We were once apes. We are animals. Animals breeds have different personalities. Why would it be different with people?

What do you mean?

I find that I have chemistry with people who are my same ethnic type. I think its best if like goes with like.

 

Dogs have been created to have distinct types. Humans do not have distinct types - we have varying degrees of everything. Varying degrees of intelligence, strength, agility, abstract thinking, mathematical ability, sociability, anger management, toe length, nose length, eye colour, whatever you can think of. There are not definite, distinguishable types because we aren't genetically separated like that.

Whatever floats your boat man. I don't personally care what they look like but if you need the people you associate with to have similar physical features to you I guess you can do that. You're missing out on most of the species though.

 

"Facts" in every area of science frequently change.
Logic will tell you that there is no way that science can tell for certain exactly where and how humans came to be.
Rethinking "Out of Africa"
[CHRISTOPHER STRINGER:] "At the moment, I'm looking again at the whole question of a recent African origin for modern humans—the leading idea over the last 20 years. This argues that we had a recent African origin, that we came out of Africa, and that we replaced all of the other human forms that were outside of Africa. But we're having to re-evaluate that now because genetic data suggest that the modern humans who came out of Africa about 60,000 years ago probably interbred with Neanderthals, first of all, and then some of them later on interbred with another group of people called the Denisovans, over in south eastern Asia.

If this is so, then we are not purely of recent African origin. We're mostly of recent African origin, but there was contact with these other so-called species. We're having to re-evaluate the Out-of-Africa theory, and we're having to re-evaluate the species concepts we apply, because in one view of thinking, species should be self-contained units. They don't interbreed with other species. However, for me, the whole idea of Neanderthals as a different species is really a recognition of their separate evolutionary history—the fact that we can show that they evolved through time in a particular direction, distinct from modern humans, and they separated maybe 400,000 years ago from our lineage. And morphologically we can distinguish a relatively complete Neanderthal fossil from any recent human."
http://dna-explained.com/2013/01/06/rethinking-out-of-africa/

 

That's possible, but the evidence suggests that the thinking animals called humans are shaped much more by culture than they are by genetics. The real problem with the blanket promoters of diversity is they fail to admit that some cultures are inherently inferior; for instance, one that approves of slavery or the open prostitution of children or promotes the gross disparity of the treatment of the two sexes.

I do believe in diversity, per se, but I also feel that yielding the ethical and humanistic progress of centuries in the mistaken pursuit of diversity serves no one any good. Some things are debatable, but others should be unconscionable.

 

The ancestors of Humanity were around some 5 MILLION years ago.

60,000 years ago Humanity had already spread out through most of the world.

AboveAlpha

 

Were there any other members of the Homo genus, outside of Africa?

 

Not until they traveled to such locations all over the world....as Humanity originated in Africa.

AboveAlpha

 

Human anthropology and genetics disproves this.

I think you do. You will have chemistry with someone who is like you. Have you ever noticed people tend to date people who look like themselves?

I strongly believe in interracial friendships and experience other cultures by visiting them. I just don't want it to come at the expense of my own diversity. culture and country.

 

Because too many weenie heads watch ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CNN, PBS, ALJIZERA, etc. They have all fed the baby pap to make whites feel guilty about something that happened over 150 years ago. They need to get over it. In 1865 the black man was emancipated.
In the South many were given 40 acres and some mules. Many became Carpetbaggers and put in charge of some areas. Many decided they wanted to stay and work for their old masters. Many decided to stay down south and work for the man. When the auto industry came around many migrated to the North for better paying jobs. Many blacks had their own businesses and hired other blacks. The government set up programs like welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, free legal, abortion clinics, low rent housing, job training, Wic, pre-school Head start, college quotas , hiring quotas, lower education standards so they can be advanced, scores of laws about how or what can be considered proper speech so they don't feel offended or feelings hurt, etc. etc. etc. that has always been a safety net for blacks. Do I feel we owe the blacks anything. Hell no. The only group in America that hasn't been able to overcome integration into and be accepted into society as equals.

 

Did you know that Whites stole their names?