Why do gays make their sexuality an issue?

Which of course makes no sense whatsoever

 

LOLOLOL!!! I never made the argument that outweighing the costs of HIV was necessary. I only argued that procreation was a neccessity, To which you replied it was not.

 

which is a reflection on you, not me.

 

you argued procreation is a neccessity that outweighs the costs of HIV. I argued that it is not, since we have 7+billion humans on the planet. there is no need to outweigh the costs of HIV.

 

Well dang, this thread has gone way over five hundred posts.

 

No, its a reflection of your inability to create intelligent strawmen.

 

Never claimed there was.

 

Which is about 605 too many.

 

Intelligent ones... hm.​

​

 

lol, standard dixon argument. make an argument, have it blown to bits, then whine and cry strawman.

 

lol.............

you're going to reach china pretty soon if you keep digging in that hole you're in.

 

Not the sharpest crayon in the box, are you? "necessity" describes procreation, NOT the outweighing the cost of HIV infections.

 

When you post 'women who have sex with women', should we know that you simply meant lesbians and weren't talking about the high risk of catching HIV from woman/woman sex???

I read up on it and see what you tried but failed to post.
Seems like you are part of the problem which makes you even more evil: you are a contributing factor to the problem and proudly posts about the effect of your bigotry. Evil.

The review of the literature makes the case that the risk of contracting
HIV is directly related to a woman’s experiences and behaviors. The
objective of this paper is not to argue that lesbians/WSW are at the same
risk as their heterosexual counterparts, but to acknowledge that there is significant risk of HIV, other STIs, and other health disparities for lesbians. These risks are exacerbated by racial disparities in health care access, as well as by homophobia, sexism, and stigma.

Source: www.gmhc.org

 

why do you continue to make my arguments for me? what was the point of you quoting the parts that make you look foolish? I don't understand why you continue to do that to yourself.

 

The average self identified lesbian woman has more male sexual partners than the average self identified heterosexual womenj. Is more likely to be an IV drug user, is more likely to engage in prostiotution AND is more likely to have had sex with men who have sex with men. I would suspect ALL these factors have more influence on the rate of HIV infection than the fact that they have sex with women

I have no idea as to what you are going on about here. BUT, I suspect your state of denial on HIV, shared by many homosexuals, is why HIV rates are so elevated among homosexuals.

 

Like I said, "NECESSITY OF PROCREATION", NOT necessity of outweighing the cost of HIV infections. Why do you keep demonstrating that you have difficulties with comprehending sentence structure.

 

..........

 

Even if what you claim is true, I ask: So what?!

I think you're overly-interested in (or overly focused upon) gay sexuality in general.

 

1/ give me links of statistics that back up these statements.
2/ NEVER assume ANYTHING about me. You are not smart enough for that and we would not want you to make a complete fool of yourself.

 

Like you said, you do not understand

 

I don't understand why you quoted something that made you look foolish.

 

Its not the woman/woman sex that leads to most HIV infections among women who have sex with women. I dont really expect you to understand.

 

But I understand just fine while the fool still doesnt have a clue.

 

Regardless of the tangents you want to go on... I'm here to tell you that homosexual people WILL continue to fight for equal rights/protections.

I surely understand enough to know that the notions you suggest should be seriously challenged.

 

dixon, that those who visit this forum know to think for themselves (rather than believe just you), is quite satisfying.