I think it has to do with how anti-intuitive evolution is, and the religious pressures in our nations, and also a lack of science education.
One word, religion. People put their religion above reason, hence the denial of something as obvious as evolution.
That is part of the problem evolution starts in the middle not at the beginning. To many time gaps and missing links
Evolution starts at the beginning of evolution. You clearly do not understand it. Please define evolution for us. Please tell us what these time gaps and missing links are.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbr_qKZg26c"]Ben Stein Retard Alert - YouTube[/ame] This is how I picture so many antiscience people on this forum.
There has to be a beginning for evolution to start. Without knowing that you can show where evolution started http://www.strengthsandweaknesses.org/Weaknesses/Fossil.Record.Gaps.htm
You mean those that want answers? Evolution creates more questions than answers in its present information
Where the first life form came from is completely irrelevant to Evolution. Abiogeneis is the study of how life froms from inert matter. Timeline of evolution
That is a justification to not explain how evolution started. What is irrelevant is those that think the beginning does not matter
What was the first primate. Where did primates evolve from? What was the first life form? Where did earth come from? How come we are not hairy like primates if we evolved from them. http://www.icr.org/article/evolution-real-science-or-nonsense/
Please pardon the interruption. Answers to these questions and more can be found here: http://www.talkorigins.org/
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg"]The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis - Dr. Jack Szostak - YouTube[/ame]