Blacks aren't a minority in the World and no I don't "hate" anybody. Sure, I'd probably prefer a hot Asian over June Shannon. Are you totally divorced from the point at hand or would you like to return? [NB. I can remind you of the point at hand if you forgot it, possibly in an intentional ad hominem derailment]
Its a stupid argument, just because you might find someone of another race attractive doesnt automatically mean you must completely change the demographics of the country. Just because someone has an Asian friend doesnt necessarily mean they want to live in Asia, in an Asian culture. If they did they might try to move there, but again just because that Asian country accepted one person that likes them, their culture, traditions doesnt mean they have to accept all people. Its laughable, we like it so much we want to destroy it. Why cant there be differences in the world with 'some' mixing? Should Japanese allow themselves to be replaced by whoever breeds the fastest? But as usual with leftist, if you dont accept an indefinite amount your racist supremest. Also, many of the women you posted have some white bloodline.
So you "don't hate" blacks....but you'd take a fat unattractive white woman over a hot black woman.....and then admit you'd take an Asian woman over the white woman. Dude, I think Nathan Bedford Forrest had less antipathy towards blacks than you do. Mind you, if you've seen pictures of the "Klan women"....I can see how you'd fit in with your choice.
1. Actually my argument was against the idea that racism was innate. Mind you with enough racist hate, a person could prove my point wrong about "penis over racism". 2. As for the country's demographics, that's a done deal. Racists and Xenophobes will be ignored soon by the Party that has pandered to them since Reagan....the Republicans, in a desire to save the Party from national party oblivion. Nor would even the Old Republican Party support "locking out" Latinos. And nobody sane support the Race War dreams of a few of our more psychotic racist "Nationalists". Prepare yourself for a future America with a lot of dark, dark hair.....brown eyes...and brown skin. Some day even Fox News will run out of blondes. 3. Does Lupita Nyong'o have "white blood"?
Oh-oh, perhaps he DOESN'T like Asians (or Latinos or Pacific Islanders or Indo-Pakistanis or Arabs) as much as he claims either???
I can tell you're a braniac. Tell us the cultural influence inherent in backward digit span tests, or how backward digit-span tests don't measure innate ability.
LoL, you know he can't choose Halle because his stormfront buddies would disown him. You put him between a rock and a hard place, hahaha
They don't. They rely on knowledge. Therefore they do not measure only intrinsic intelligence. Petty insults won't change that fact. Sorry.
What an Earth are you talking about? What does my sexual feeling have to do with the point at hand? If I find a black woman sexually unattractive I "hate blacks"? If I find an attractive Asian woman more attractive than an ugly White woman this proves...what exactly? Your "point" is irrelevant ad hominem and you should be modded at this point.
I think the binary false dilemma rhetoric of the left has warped your brain to the point where you think only two groups can exist at once. Sadly you fail to understand basic words like "minority".
I will admit to having skipped ALL the previous posts as I knew the acrimony that would arise from the OP. But, here's something to think upon - Are we not already a mixed society? How many can say they are pure White. And just what is "white" anyway? If it refers to skin color, than the only people with "white" skin come from the very far north where the sun seldom shines and they therefore do not need melatonin. So, let's deal with Caucasian. Caucasian was a group of people who lived in east-central Europe. How many can claim direct ascendancy from those people? Do you want to deal with European? You'd be amazed how many people coming here from Central and South America have European blood. So what exactly is the thread all about - except race-bating?
You said they were not a minority. That would seem to indicate you think they represent over 50%. You do understand the definition of "minority", right? - - - Updated - - - Who exactly has advocated that whites need to be killed or sterilized? No one has made the argument in favor of genocide for whites. It's a non-sequitur.
Like Super21....we all know what the REAL answer is...even the racists. All those married plantation owners who "took a walk down to Cabin Row on a hot summer night".....prove the lie that racist men won't choose a black woman over a white woman if the black woman is more attractive or the guy just wants to get laid.
No....just YOUR kind of white person, mike. And history is quickly going to see that happen....naturally, as guys like you fail to keep up with "replacements". Try as you might, you won't be able to keep your grand-kids (if any) from possibly turning from the True Faith of racism...or even engaging in "miscegenation". 200 years ago there were more like you than there were 100 years ago....and 100 years ago there were more like you than 50 years ago......50 years ago there were more like you than today.......and in 50, 100, 200 at most....there will be none. No genocide......evolution. You'll go the way of the Australopithecene.
Are you brain-dead? How do backward-digit-span tests rely on knowledge? You repeat numbers backwards. I guess you're spewing garbage on a subject on which you know nothing. - - - Updated - - - So does science need to be suppressed? You already suppress general discourse.
It's an intrinsic cognitive ability; it's effective because it's highly correlated with IQ based off traditional intelligence tests.
You stated aarlier you wanted all White people to be blended out (demographically genocided) by other races. Why? Why don't you say the same about the Chinese or Arabs? Let me get your new line straight, you want to only mix "White racists" (European preservationists) with other races? Why? Does this make sense? I'm sure (as in actually sure) that the Chinese and Arabs don't want mass immigration so they are "racist" too. Why not attack them? Why the special hate for Whites? Is it anything to do with Jewish grievances etched on your tiny brain by relentless media brainwashing?
America's current demographic change is primarily caused by Hispanic mass immigration rather than by new waves of migrations from Asia and Africa. As the graph above shows, the percentage of Hispanic students keeps increasing but the proportions of Asian and black students remain constant. America traditionally counts all Hispanics as non-whites but white Hispanics make up a majority in many Latin American countries (97% in Argentina and 88% in Uruguay). It's projected that white Americans overall (non-Hispanic whites together with white Hispanics) will continue as the majority, at 73.1% (or 303 million out of 420 million) in 2050, only a slight decline from 80% in 2008.
Ah, but racist conservatives have made it VERY clear that they don't consider ANY "Hispanics" white. I do agree that in the future, when the "non Hispanic white" population gets too low, racists will suddenly start to consider "Hispanics" white to increase the numbers. The same thing happened to the Italians in the past.
No "racists" (people who don't harbor fantastic and destructive delusions/push such on only Whute people in a hypocritical attack) will never consider Hispanics "White" (of European ancestry).
History repeats itself. Not to long ago, someone that looked like Sly Stallone would NEVER be considered "white". Today? He's a "white" man.