Why isnt Africa more advanced than white countries?

A certain Mrs. Palin would argue with that.

 

so would many americans round here believe africa was a country
[video=youtube;dTG4toZtg4c]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=dTG4toZtg4c[/video]

 

What "flood"? The one where Noah took pairs of ALL the animals on the planet and put them on a boat?

 

Yeah that Roman colonization and exploitation of Northern Europeans just held them back centuries.

Without the effects of colonization Africa it would be even more backwater.

 

You should read about the discoveries they are making around European Monoliths. The oldest standing structures on earth are the monoliths and the villages that were built around them and the division of labor that went into them represent the first civilization, other than what is at the bottom of the black sea of course.

The black sea deluge theory would support that civilization didn't begin in Mesopotamia but in the black sea spread out around the black sea as the inhabitants were dispersed.

 

Sounds good. I have seen the big Greek ruins and all that. Overrated.

 

It took a few posts, but you did finally reveal your true agenda. Sigh. It's always about the Jews...

 

Define "backwater".

 

yep, that one.

 

yep, see my avatar

 

Of course Negroes are African, but they originated in the Northern Sub-Sahara area (perhaps centered a bit below the ancient kingdom of Nubia). If the Negroes aren't from Africa, where did they come from? Scholars who rely on the Old Testament as their touchstone for historical and scientific fact aren't true scholars. If you want to post religious mumble-jumble, please confine it to articles of faith and morality instead of pretending it has some kind of final authority in the sciences. That's why Creationists are such a joke.

 

Israel most likely.

- - - Updated - - -

And 'negroe' is such a scientific word too huh?

more like mumble jumble

 

Just get out of the thread j0nah.. You can't possibly be serious.

 

This is actually an extremely good question but the answer lies in a million sections and it’s really difficult to find a beginning.

“If” you believe in God and are very religious, then none of what researches, scientists, doctors, and anthropologists have written about for years will make any sense to you.

If you believe in evolution then you’ll probably be more open to the facts as they surround this topic.

Life began in Africa (first bomb that always gets people worked up) and early man branched out in nomadic tribes populating what we all now call mother earth.

As we resettled over the thousands of years we literally took new forms in appearance, thought patterns, social norms, languages, and culture.

Africans, Arabs, Aborigines, South American Indians and Northern Plains Indians are very tribal people that look at the world through a different prism than their cousins that spent many years in the Caucus Mountains (a region at the border of Europe and Asia, situated between the Black and the Caspian Seas.)

Necessity is a huge part of the answer as tribal people had quite different necessities living in a warm climate opposed to a much colder one.

Stationary Tribal people put more emphasis on the land where as traveling nomadic tribes, hunters & gatherers were forced to put more emphasis on an always evolving environment to meet the ever changing needs.

You could talk about this all day but the best thing to do is buy a book on the subject of which there are many…………and in no short supply.

 

like you know anything about Israel.

 

The reason Afrika is not as advanced as europe technologically, which is what this is about, is because it is not in the best interests of the 'powers that be' [the european capitalists] that Afrika is a major world power.

It really is as simple as that.

 

We were hunter gathers during the paleolithic period.

 

Everybody was hunter gatherers during the paleolithic period. I believe the posters were referring to a more recent time period. They're not going to get into a debate about whose flint tools were better.

 

if you phrase it that way, the question is really why there is that the european capitalists and not the african ones are holding to all the power.

 

Obviously because it's the view of the scientific community, in an overwhelming majority, that our (sweden) flint tools were clearly superior to all others'.

 

Black Africa IS more advanced than most white countries, particularly the United States. Technology is not a gauge to judge the culture of other countries. Examine what has happened to the so-called "technologically-advanced" America. For about three hundred years white America boasted about its inovation, vision and industry. So how did white men become ironically stupid and silly? The white fools in their zeal to do "good" gave it all away to minorities from other nations. On invitation from the white fools, white America became the boarding house for the world. Conversely, black Africa had the foresight to revolt and evict all the white devils from their country. Black Africa is now a self-determined and happy land.

Look at America now and all it's glorious technology. Whites in America have painted themselves into the proverbial corner where they cower awaiting for blacks to abuse, frighten and punish them for social injustices against African Americans.

So who's stupid now? HA HA

 

Oh what wouldn't I give to give up my life in the west for the happy african life with aids, starvation and wars?

 

There are still many people in Africa who believe in the power of witchdoctors. I trust Nom de Plume doesn't believe that witchdoctoring is a viable and culturally superior form of thought and technology? Or maybe that rumor put out by some South African witchdoctors that having sex with a girl child can cure AIDs is a sign of superior culture and morality.

 

At first I thought that the witchdoctor would quite enjoy that since its a rumour that makes people beg him to screw girls, but then I realised that all girls would have aids. not so win for him anymore.

 

Because maybe it is not in the nature of Afrikans to exploit others [capitalism] in such a way.