Why Not Incestuous Marriage?

For that reason, of your ideological absolute, is why some people still promote resistance to the societally destructiveness of your path, for the sake of last protected citizens of our nations. The children.

Your slippery slope is not imaginary, and their fate lies at the bottom.

 

It's certainly possible. It's the same reason teachers aren't allowed to have relationships with their students, even where the student is over the age of consent.

 

Do they go to prison or are the fired? In most places I've heard where over the age of consent relationships aren't allowed it's not criminal but isn't allowed due to conflict of interest.

 

Yes, i suppose the point of contention is over whether or not the path is destrictive and if it actually poses a threat to the children.

Old people hang on to their way of life claiming they want to save the "children", when it's actually just their way of life they are trying to save. It's been going on as long as people have been able to talk about the "good old days".

Children have an uncanny ability to adapt, adults, not so much.

 

Then it stands to reason, that a person whose parents have so much control over them that the could force them into an incestuous marriage, then they could just as easily force them into any marriage. Should we just ban all marraige in order to protect children from being coerced into marriage by their parents?

 

no I am against parents and children entering into a life long contract that is a total investment of self.
Why do the bigots who hate gay people being able to publicly acknowledge their love have to come up with such ridiculous arguments???????????
Oh right because their foundation if bigotry.

 

and here we get the absurd argument of the day. This is why I think this form of bigotry against gays is a mental illness.

 

Care to provide ANY published source even as much as even mentioning such a purpose? Closely related couples have been prohibited from marrying because of the potential of procreation and potential of detrimental genetic defects.

 

Where the (*)(*)(*)(*) did I say I was against gay marriage? Now you're just grasping at (*)(*)(*)(*)ing straws.

 

then why are you supporting those that do?

 

Where am I supporting them? How the (*)(*)(*)(*) is saying that consenting adults should be allowed to marry supporting the movement against gay marriage? Your logic is flawed.

 

don't care enough about it to fight them if they want to get married.. let them... as long as they are consenting adults

if it's an issue we should ban Anonymous adoptions as they probably create many incestuous relationships

 

except child bearing has nothing to do with marriage, per the gay argument.... why should it apply for some, and not gays?

 

Can gay sex result in retarded/mutated/dis-formed children?

 

I think you misunderstood my poorly worded post.

 

Incest doesn't either.

 

Tell that to the British ...:icon_pee:

 

can gay parents lead to maladjusted kids?




FWIW, for first time incest in a family.... the risks for a deformed baby of close relations is LESS than it is for a mother smoking during pregnancy.... and less risky than a woman over 40 giving birth.


give me an hour and I'll find the link.... I'm walking out the door....


but none of it's the point, gays not being able to have kids has never disqualified them

 

The moment Gay marriage comes up it almost always turns to animal humping or mother (*)(*)(*)(*)ing with the right wingers... its quite telling.

 

It only works with genes that are already present. Incest doesn't magically create bad genes.

 

I dont do much incest study so Ill take your word for it

 

It's simple genetics. What you learnt in school should be enough for understanding.

 

Or perhaps you're recognizing that you can't support gay marriage without supporting those others unless you engage in hypocrisy.

 

I know it's a criminal offence in the UK. I don't know what the legal situation is in the US.