Why Russia yearns for empire

pjohns · Mar 28, 2014

It is a most interesting (if somewhat depressing) article by James R. Holmes in The Diplomat.

Here is a bit of it:

Should Russian actions in Crimea have come as a shock? Not here. Sure, the specifics were surprising. But thats true of any sudden contingency, isnt it? We all suffer from a prophecy deficit. Indeed, even President Putin may not have planned this venture in advance. He may have simply seen an opportunity coming and seized it. Such events are intrinsically unpredictable.

But scope out to the macro level. Ever since the Cold War, Russians have yearned to restore their standing as a power to be reckoned with. Nor is this impulse likely to subside, either among the political leadership, or the armed forces, or an electorate that covets a return to glory.

The thirst for renown and say-so is more than an interest, to use the anodyne term foreign-policy specialists habitually deploy. Its something elemental. Passion shapes perceptions of interest. Its a propellant for human actions. Regaining control of Crimea does more for Moscow than guarantee access to the Black Sea. It supplies a token of great power. Flourishing such a token shows that Russia is putting a painful episode the Soviet Unions collapse, which Putin famously pronounced a geopolitical catastrophe behind it.

Thucydides would nod knowingly. The Greek historian lists interests as only one among three prime movers for human actions, the others being fear and honor. Policy specialists, by contrast, prefer to think in terms of quantifiable interests. Doing so implies that we can plug numbers into a cost/benefit formula and foresee what policymakers will do. It also implies that its easy to compromise when quarrels arise. Tally up the respective interests, split the difference, and all will be well. Right?

And thats why Model UN gatherings and similar role-playing exercises customarily solve all the worlds problems in an afternoon. Theres no fervor to such artificial exercises. Having been acculturated to the idea that power politics is wicked and negotiation settles all, students have little invested in some hypothetical dispute except for avoiding conflict. Thats the object to which they attach paramount importance. Ergo, they gladly surrender part of the national interest for the sake of amity. Lions lie down with lambs!!! ...

The Naval Diplomat has come to be a firm believer that honor perches atop the hierarchy of Thucydides three human motives. (Id put fear second, for what its worth.) Analyzing international interactions, consequently, isnt just about assessing interests dispassionately. Its about divining how much value statesmen, soldiers, and ordinary citizens attach to their interests, which in turn determines the price theyre prepared to pay for those interests, which in turn determines how willing they are to compromise. A winner-take-all dynamic may take hold when important constituencies truly prize something. Its beside the point whether outsiders rate the stakes as small. ...

Its a safe bet other would-be revisionists are monitoring the situation closely to gauge whether anyone will resist in similar contingencies in the future, and with how much vigor. And so will those embroiled in territorial disputes with such powers (including a certain one that rhymes with diner as Rhode Islanders pronounce it). If they anticipate no succor from America or other friends, they may arm themselves for self-help and act accordingly. Prospects for peaceful coexistence will sag.
Click to expand...

And the link to the entire article: Why Russia Yearns for Empire | The Diplomat

Log in or Sign up

Why Russia yearns for empire

pjohns Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Why Russia yearns for empire

pjohns Well-Known Member

Share This Page

Useful Searches