Will the UK be a mulatto nation by 2100?

I told you what lack of teacher expectation means when it is spoken about in research. I know this from being involved in such. Your criticism was that you believed the University of Warwick does no research and just comes up with assumptions like you yourself do. You claimed to have read the entire paper and that their methods of research were nothing like I said. My guess on how they did their research was based on research into girls failing at maths and this being found to be due to low teacher expectation. The methods used then were as I said. You said this was not the methods they used and that their methods did not prove that they suffered from low teacher expectations in the manner I described. I asked you to provide a detailed critique of their methods and your reason for saying they had failed. You claimed you had already done this. Provide a link to prove you are telling the truth.

You still have not provided a reply to the questions I asked in this post http://www.politicalforum.com/opini...-mulatto-nation-2100-a-27.html#post1061561684

 

LOL! I'm sure the Brythonic people felt the same way when it was invaded by Germanics from Normandy.

 

I have read the paper and they simply imagine low teacher expectations from tier allocation data.
There is no classroom observation.
The critique I have given is quite sufficient and logically invalidates the conclusion of the paper. No more detail is required.
It is funny that you ask me for a "detailed" critique when you can't even be bothered to read the paper.
Rude even.

 

You left out the House of Saud. Why?

 

I suspect that the 'bad' genes are going to be dominant. So where will we be then?
The culture reflects the man. And the races are different, in terms of temperment, personal discipline, desire for knowledge and willingness to comply with society's laws.

Compare an Asian city to an American one. Or a European one.

Compare either to one in Mexico or South America.

Compare any and all of them to cities in African republics.

 

What for? I've known some, and they didn't inspire much confidence.

 

But you know better right?

 

They are expected to.

They are also much more likely to be multi-lingual.

Think about it.

 

Totally not true, no matter how many times you stamp your feet and insist that it is so.

 

is that you stomping your little feet? LOL

 

I worked in education. I don't knows better about the detail, no, but I do know very well the types who push this stuff, and they are not in the game of scientific objectivity, I can tell you that. Frankly, the whole business is so obviously full of smelly motivations that it bores me half to death to discuss it as if seriously.

 

Slowness of system produces double posting again and again and again and again. And I do sit waiting for ages, honest.

 

If we do these comparisons, then what is the result? Unless you refer to an implication in the Book of Revelations by which the survivors will be the Asians, you are only describing the rate of Americanization of cultures, not genetics and racial developments. How to interpret this?

 

I'll stomp my feet for you!!!

 

This is what you wrote:

So you are obviously totally ignorant of modern IQ testing.

Is this model familiar to you?



Do you really think they give IQ tests to people in foreign languages?
How many of these subtests are language based?

 

The consistent international pattern of racial IQ differences is due to what people "expect"? So the East Asians adopted in America and Belgium got a higher score because that is what they were "expected" to do? Africans in a a village in Africa who have never heard of IQ tests get a low score because they were "expected" to? "Expected" by whom?

Are all IQ differences caused by what some indeterminate person "expects"?

 

Uh oh...

 

Sooner if not already...

 

[video=youtube;WzbnARyPMMk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzbnARyPMMk&feature=related[/video]

The real question is not whether this is happening - it is probably already too late - but rather what this is going to mean for the future.
Are all groups of people really so similar? This is an important question with serious consequences. Why are the Arab countries (outside the thinly populated gulf states with all that oil) so poor?

Maybe, just maybe, the third world is so poor because of their high fertility rates, not the other way around.

People are fleeing into Europe to escape the horrible poverty and daily violence in their own countries.
But once Europe becomes like all these other countries, there's not going to be anywhere left in the world for Europeans to flee to.
What will be the fate of our descendants? What posterity are we leaving them?

 

LOL at the "SHARP" guy. We have one of those here on the boards.

 

Amazing how convenient it is for the left to always be too bored and tired to try and refute facts they can't refute.

 

I just read an interesting article on how the Cavendish banana (the one we see in the stores) is in danger of going extinct because its lack of diversity. You see, since it has been interbred and genetically isolated, it is less able to withstand disease and now a particularly nasty fungus is threatening Candendish banana crops around the world. This is nothing new. Biologists have known for years that genetic isolation is not healthy for a population. Without fresh genes entering the gene pool, the genome starts to stagnate and the species is less able to adapt to change. Early humans knew this from observation and would travel far and wide to find prospective mates in order to avoid in-breeding. Looking at some of the comments on this thread, I would say some of the members on this forum could use more diversity and less in-breeding.

 

You are reasoning from one variety of banana to the white race? LMAO.

The white race is in no danger of harm from inbreeding.

Inbreeding at the level of about 4th cousin is optimal for humans, lest they risk outbreeding depression.

DarkDaimon wants white people to mix with Negroes, and will use any spurious argument to support that.

 

Horse hockey. Outbreeding depression is not a concern any more. The last distinct sub-species was absorbed into the species millenia ago.

 

Actually I was refuting the belief that the mixing of "races" is somehow bad for the gene pool. I was merely using inbreeding as an example, but I was really talking about genetic isolation. Yes, the "white race" and human race in general are in no danger of harm from inbreeding or even genetic isolation, but that is because of our global economy and our ability to travel, but what you and others are advocating could very well lead to genetic isolation. So please stop using genetics to justify your xenophobia.

Your last line made me laugh. You accuse me of using any spurious argument to support my position, yet you assert that I just want "white people to mix with Negroes". Where in my post did I say or even suggest that? The truth is that I could care less one way or the other if people from different ethnic backgrounds want to mix as I see absolutely no danger in it.