Wisconsin Supreme Court rules state erred by giving blanket exemption to voter ID rules during COVID

Wisconsin Supreme Court rules state erred by giving blanket exemption to voter ID rules during COVID

Ruling opens door to challenge potentially tens of thousands of ballots in state where difference between Biden, Trump is just about 20,000 votes.

https://justthenews.com/politics-po...es-state-erred-giving-blanket-exemption-voter

This is a Trump victory and has the potential to give the state of Wisconsin over to Trump.

Voters were wrongly informed they could vote absentee, claiming they were 'indefinitely confined' due to Covid. Many of those votes will be tossed.

 

Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Absentee Ballot Distribution Violated State Law, Opens Door For Challenges

https://theconservativetreehouse.co...violated-state-law-opens-door-for-challenges/

 

Saw this. They have to independently verify each ballot met the criteria. Good luck with that.

 

They may be able to reopen the Texas lawsuit with this ruling. Certainly with different state supreme courts at odds with each other will need to be cleared up by the SCOTUS. If the SCOTUS doesn't wimp out again.

 

From the Link:

Good luck with that.

 

SCOTUS has already shut the door.

 

Dude - as Trump supporters said over and over and over - the popular vote doesn't matter once the Electoral College has posted their choice. That
is now done with. No court is going to change the vote over internet rumors - just as they haven't done once in over 50 cases so far.

 

Matt Braynard has already been through the voting data extensively. This will not be the challenge you think it is.

 

The ruling from the WI Supreme Court opens the door to tens of thousands of votes being thrown out.

 

Of course they can and they will. What should concern you is that Democrat lied and cheated to try and win. Biden did not win and that is becoming more clear with these types of things. Hopefully it does reverse the election as China will easily control Joe because he's dirty and in their pockets. Joe the money launderer racket kink. Big Dog!

 

Wouldn't matter. The Electoral College has voted. And as Trump supporters said again, and again, and again, that's the only
vote that matters.

And beyond that, EVERY SINGLE one of these threads you have posted about "Earth-shattering" election revelations has proved to be complete duds.

 

"office mates" according to Hunter.

 

Not sure how sound that point is, but it sure is worth making.

 

ok, no problem then. Let Trump lose another case, right? This one decision by the WI Supreme Court won't matter at all. /s

 

Dude - internet rumors are proof of nothing. Every official channel, every government watch-dog, even international election watch dogs, have
stated that the election was fairly run. All we see is that Trump has become the King of the Karens.

 

Funny! 'The left can't meme' is not 100% accurate.

 

This is the one. Send money now so Trump can expose this fraud!

 

As of two hours ago, the Wisconsin Supreme Court has ruled against Trump - again. Stating that time for any challenge to the rules was BEFORE the
election - not after the last votes were counted. It's over, dude. That horse is dead.

The Electors have voted. Biden won by 306 votes (Wisconsin wouldn't change
the outcome no matter how hard Trump's turds are polished).

 

Not in alternative fact land. Trump won today 538-0

 

They will have to go and verify if each voter was sick or of age. Again good luck. Oh and the vote is certified and the electors have voted.

 

Matt Braynard - a diehard Trumper whose phony math has been exposed repeatedly

https://www.gpb.org/news/2020/12/10...icans-baseless-claims-of-voting-fraud-persist

Another witness was Matt Braynard, who was paid $40,000 by the Amistad Project, affiliated with the conservative legal interst group the Thomas More Society, to analyze data of alleged election fraud.

Braynard claimed to have thousands of examples of specific voters that should not have been allowed to cast ballots in this election, but a quick search of records by GPB News found registered Georgia voters were included in spreadsheets provided as evidence in a case filed by President Trump and David Shafer, chair of the Georgia Republican Party.

Democrat Bee Nguyen of Atlanta also said that she reviewed Braynard's data, and told the committee that of the first 10 names that were alleged out-of-state voters, she found public records that confirmed eight of them were longtime Georgia voters and property owners and one was a duplicate entry.

"They claim homestead exemption on these homes as their primary residence and they pay property taxes on their homes here in the state of Georgia," she said. "I was able to reach one voter on the phone. The voter verified that both he and his wife still live at this address in the state of Georgia and he has only voted in the state of Georgia."

Nguyen also said a list of voters supposedly registered at post office boxes includes people that a quick Google search shows live in two sets of apartments or condos that have a mail center underneath it — including both Republican and Democratic voters that she contacted.

"For those two buildings alone, I've identified at least 70 individuals in the first building that are on this exhibit having been accused of disguising their residential address as a P.O. box," she said. "And the second list, there are at least 58 folks that are named for that specific apartment complex."

 

What was stated in the OP IS TOTALLY BOGUS

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wir...-court-tosses-trump-election-lawsuit-74717684

Judge ruled that the challenge to the indefinitely confined was without merit and the other challenges came too late.

The party's over!

 

No, this is something that is specific to Wisconsin, the only other state in the Texas lawsuit with a mandated photo ID law is Georgia, however the leadership in Georgia didn't make the same exemptions that the Wisconsin leaders did. Furthermore, the Supreme Court ruling had to do with whether states were in violation of federal law. The individual rulings at the state level are another matter since each state has their own individual laws on elections. The US Supreme Court has already made its ruling on the grounds of the US constitution

 

You need to start sufing the alternate reality net

Jets are 13-0 on that Earth - here is proof

 

Not bogus at all. Just read the court's decision for yourself. The door was opened.