Woman who claimed Justice Kavanaugh raped her now admits they’ve never even met.

Agree, none was true...there was no corroboration hence the reason he was appointed. Funny how lefties only hear what they want that will backup their narrative. They create lies and then convince themselves they're true. Case and point, reportedly everything ...I mean everything was made up in the Mueller Russian probe from beginning to end just to obtain FISA warrants so they could spy on Trump.

I think this is why Obama is rabidly on the trail trying to get his party back in so they can bury all that because HE was also involved.

Anyway they seem to do this a lot..make up stories, that is. And who would know more of how to do that than a psychologist. This is also why key details were conveniently left out so the FBI wouldn't have enough to work with leaving everyone with having to trust and assume she was telling the truth.

My guess is this very well could have happened to her but it wasn't by Kavanaugh and she and the DEMS know it. They cooked up that story to be used as a last resort. They did a polygraph alright but only asked questions about the assault, not who was the perpetrator. That so called polygraph was reportedly vague.

 

maybe if you would start by giving us who this third person supposedly is

 

Brilliant, yes. A good man? Questionable. I see no phony political stunt here.

 

I am referring to the people Blasey Ford mentioned as being at the party at which she alleges she was assaulted by Bart.

 

Do you have the transcript of the questions?

 

If you were sexually attacked at that party, maybe not 30 years later. Read the questions and answers in his testimony for the info since I cannot remember specifics. There were statements in that yearbook that referred to drinking and sex and he twisted them to mean something else. At this point, who cares?

 

Whuh huh? Of course, he denied that anything happened. Wouldn't you? Why would she lie when she knew that he was a friend of Kavanaugh? She simply told the truth. I am aware that flock members would deny her allegations no matter what.

 

no you are claiming there was third person in the room
here is your quote
"she was credible because there was a third person in the room"
so I am asking who is this third person in the room that corroborated her allegation giving it credibility?

 

Not me Elde Fruit. You are stitching me up with something I did not say. Maybe you ought get your schtik together and read who posted what, especially ibobbrob?

 

*deleted dumb comment of my own*

 

maybe so but you still replied to the question about the third person in the room with this post
"Show me the evidence that the 3rd person 'denies' it happened."
so I am asking who is THAT third person?

If you want evidence from that third person you need to give a name

 

I think they'll pay a heavy price on Tuesday for their shenanigans.

 

The Democrats didn't know that she was lying did they?

 

I never stated that the third person corroborated her allegation. Quite the contrary. He was Kavanaugh's close friend and did what I would expect him to do. Of course, he refused to face the Senate sub-committee.

 

Maaaate, I am careful in what I say when I am unsure of context. I had at all times, the Blasey Ford allegations in mind. She said there were others at the party where she claims to have been assaulted by Bart. Not one of those persons she nominated made any denial of what she said. They simply said they had no recollection of it (or similar.) Mountain, meet Mole Hill.

Here ya go. Knock yourself out. Bart's bestie, Mark Judge, whom Ford nominated as being in the room, has no recollection (his words....but the coward did not front the Senate Committee) of the incident.

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/...was-at-party-kavanaugh-judge-2018-9?r=US&IR=T

 

Trump lies all the time for political gain.

 

Corroborated, corroborated.......not collaborated.

 

here is the problem you and other seam to have

when you claim you weren't there which all the ones Ford claimed was either at the party or in the room has testified too that they weren't there
then they cant also claim nothing happened now can they because you weren't there to see it not happening

 

No doubt they will be shocked when that point is proven.

 

Thank you for admitting the left does.

 

Thanks. Correction made.

 

I don't know what time of day it is where you are but you are not doing well. Read the link I posted. Here:

https://www.businessinsider.com.au/...was-at-party-kavanaugh-judge-2018-9?r=US&IR=T

 

Can you support that they did with evidence?

 

You are claiming Fords allegations are credible because no one Ford gave as a witness has denied it happen
but the problem with your assertion no one can deny it happened because no one can remember ever being there not to see it happen

 

I am claiming nothing beyond what I have said which is that those Ford nominated as being there at the party said they had no recollection....which is, in fact, not an assertion that what Ford alleges is untrue......not a denial. It is a nothing...goes neither way. Like.....'Bush Lawyer, did you see that comet go across the sky in 2001?" To which I reply, "I have no recollection of it." That is not a denial that there was said comet.....it is a statement of zero recollection of it.