Woman who claimed Justice Kavanaugh raped her now admits they’ve never even met.

With his drinking habit 30 is highly doubtful

 

This accusation never saw the light of day. She wrote a single email claiming to be the Jane Doe in a public letter but retracted the very first time she was questioned. Stupid, and I doubt the DOJ charges her.

 

https://www.politico.com/story/2015/02/ruth-bader-ginsburg-napping-alcohol-sotu-115172

 

Which is why Sessions has to go.

 

Everyone knows wine is good for heart. Beer not so much

 

I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for Jeff Sessions to do ANYTHING but collect another paycheck. He makes $210,700 annually, which is "rabbit-turd" money by Washington D. C. standards, so I doubt going after radical Democrat-sympathizers and liars is at the 'top of his list'....

 

That dog wont hunt.

 

Wow, the Democrats who put her up to these fake allegations are real scumbags.

Why do Democrats constantly have to work to destroy good men and the country? Are they still butthurt over losing the 2016 and the civil war?

 

One must conclude-yes.

 

How could one forget the disgusting tactics of lefty....

 

I won't be forgetting on Tuesday.

 

Trumpists talking about integrity and morals! ROFL

 

Almost as bad a demo, see the op story for proof.

 

Example of a Democrat not caring about dishonesty in their party. Corruption, greed, and graft, no biggie!

 

Like this influenced your vote.

 

I think it had something to do with beer. Leftists have been a little vague on the subject; just as they can never point out HOW Trump is a racist in any way that makes sense to actual -- you know -- SANE people.

 

It totally influenced me, and also coworkers and friends who previously had no interest in politics.

Tuesday is coming.

 

This is what the Democrats INSISTED the FBI to investigate because she HAD TO BE BELIEVED? Well, she's being investigated. There are more than her being investigated. What happened to the media? Why did they not find and investigate this woman? I mean, she HAS TO BE BELIEVED. It was IMPORTANT. They wanted to delay his appointment because of these "credible" allegations that they didn't know squat about. Classic example of how things don't turn out like the Democrats thought they would.


"Recent coverage is limited and devoted to political considerations of the allegations, but not the merit of them. If Kavanaugh had credible sexual assault allegations against him, as the media claimed, they should be fully investigated even after his confirmation, since he continues to work with and around women, and has children at home. Right? Why would his confirmation change anything about the tenacity with which the media covered this story? Is it less scandalous to have a “credibly accused” rapist on the Supreme Court than to have a “credibly accused” nominee to the court?"
https://thefederalist.com/2018/10/3...don-their-investigation-into-brett-kavanaugh/



"Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley is referring attorney Michael Avenatti and his client Julie Swetnick to the Justice Department for criminal investigation related to their accusations against Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh during his confirmation process.

Swetnick was among the women who came forward to accuse Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Specifically, she said she observed Kavanaugh and his friends drinking to excess at parties in high school and lining up outside bedrooms to gang rape females. "

Grassley sent a letter Thursday to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the FBI Director Christopher Wray asking they investigate Avenatti and Swetnik for three potential criminal violations: conspiracy, false statements and obstruction of Congress.
https://www.rollcall.com/news/polit...ugh-accuser-client-for-criminal-investigation

 

Well, people should care because it sure appears that a person has been the victim of character assassination based on a lie. Based on that, a lot of people falsely accused Kavanaugh of being something he's not. For instance, check out this post:

Perhaps this should be an epiphany for some that their zealous hyper-partisanship is leading them down false trails. Perhaps this might be the time for some on the left to reflect on the fact that they willfully believed people with unsubstantiated stories only because they WANTED to believe them. I should think that if it had happened to them, they'd want the fact that their name was falsely sullied to be screamed from the rooftops.

 

No. The Democrats never mentioned this woman.

 

Can you provide any evidence that anyone put her up to this?

 

Your name is US Conservative. You are completely full of it.

 

Republicans don't respond to facts, but I salute your effort.

 

Yours as well. cheers.