World Implications if NASA Finally Admits to Life on Mars

So I watched the video in Post 63- and the evidence is undeniable- there are rocks on Mars.

 

They're pretty (*)(*)(*)(*)ing deniable. The video does not demonstrate anything beyond speculation.

- - - Updated - - -

You have exactly what proof that they've doctored images?

 

And your going tell me you didn't see any humanoids . Man ,you trolls are so full it , nobody takes your word for anything . what counts is I'll have close to a 1000 views in 24 hours and 90% of those people will do further investigations and won't be able to deny the facts and on the average they'll tell at least two more people to watch the evidence. So ,inside of three weeks to start their will be at least 10 million more people that will know the truth. In less than month it could be a100 million.

 

I saw rocks. No humanoids. Maybe the question you should be asking is why you are the only one seeing what you think you are seeing.

 

Townsend,

Have you considered to possibility that you have an undiagnosed case of dementia? I'm trying not to be insulting, just... I don't know if you realize that I suppose that the rate of undiagnosed dementia is rather high in the general population. That would explain a large number of fantastical sightings, and mysterious sounds, that only some people see or hear and not others.

If Humanoid life is discovered on Mars it would be a marvel that they can survive in a desert, out in the open without protection. There would have to be serious discussion in the scientific community about the origins of life in the solar system, and whether there is contamination in the past results taken on Mars. There are a lot of theories and stuff hinging on what we've found so far. If it were wrong, or worse the readings were contaminated, that would set back the study of the solar system by decades.

If microscopic life were found it wouldn't be so bad, they would just have to come up with new theories for how life developed on Mars had survived all of this time. I wouldn't imagine that they've gotten too far contemplating the results of found or missing microbes on Mars. Certainly not too far that they can't alter the theories and play catch up.

 

Well since about 99% of the commenters about that video ON YOUTUBE SEES IT TOO I guess they all have dementia too. None are so blind that refuse to see what's in front of them. Your punking me, aren't you ,dude?

 

Do you believe in UFO's and angel sightings too? They have Youtube videos.

- - - Updated - - -

Townsend,

You still have yet to answer the question: why reason is there for NASA to cover up the existence of an extinct alien civilization on Mars?

 

As far as protection goes it reaches 75 to 80 degrees F ,certain times of the year and they live underground most of the time with covered protected tunnels on the surface. Water at the poles melts into craters where they've built dams to hold it . It is then pumped through the tunnels to the underground cities.

 

You have exactly what evidence to back up this nonsense?

 

Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs, often referred to as "the Brookings Report," was a 1960 report commissioned by NASA and created by the Brookings Institution in collaboration with NASA's Committee on Long-Range Studies. It was submitted to the House Committee on Science and Astronautics of the United States House of Representatives in the 87th United States Congress on April 18, 1961.[1] It was entered into the Congressional Record and can be found in any library possessing the Congressional Record for that year.
The report has become noted for one short section titled, "The implications of a discovery of extraterrestrial life," which examines the potential implications of such a discovery on public attitudes and values. The section briefly considers possible public reactions to some possible scenarios for the discovery of extraterrestrial life, stressing a need for further research in this area. It recommends continuing studies to determine the likely social impact of such a discovery and its effects on public attitudes, including study of the question of how leadership should handle information about such a discovery and under what circumstances leaders might or might not find it advisable to withhold such information from the public.
While not specifically recommending a cover-up of evidence of extraterrestrial life, Proposed Studies on the Implications of Peaceful Space Activities for Human Affairs does suggest that contact with intelligent extraterrestrial life (or strong evidence of its reality) could have a disruptive effect on human societies. Moreover, it does mention the possibility that leadership might wish to withhold evidence of extraterrestrial life from the public under some conditions.[4]

 

What exactly makes an extinct alien civilization one of those "some conditions"?

 

The orbiter and curiosity pictures show it all and this is aerospace engineers findings not mine.

 

Curiosity and the Orbiter have found underground cities and dams in the poles? Source?

 

Seriously?

Burroughs was far more interesting at creating this stuff, and was just as credible as your sources.

 

Watch video on post #63 , they 're not extinct and NASA KNOWS IT. You think they're spending billions of dollars and planning to spend billions more on another orbiter shortly
just to look at a bunch of dam rocks . Paleeezzzz !!!!!!!

 

Even if they aren't extinct, what makes the existence of an alien race that lives in caves with stone age technology and emits no EM signals (meaning they haven't even reached WWI level tech) one of the "some conditions" that the government would want to cover up its existence?

 

They were once far more advanced than we are, but there is overwhelming evidence the planet suffered some kind cataclysmic catastrophe 10's of thousands of years ago plus admitting to there existence would have far reaching unknown affects on every aspect of society ,world politics and religious beliefs. When people find out the Govt. has been lying to them for years , how can you predict what would happen so why take the chance.

 

What evidence do you have that "They were once far more advanced than we are"?

And that doesn't answer my question: What would make the existence of a primitive alien race one worthy of a government cover-up?

 

There are structures on the planet that mimic structures here on earth , like the Egyptian pyramids. Many respected scientist and scholars have postulated they maybe responsible for some of the unexplained megalithic structures on earth . Plus there is evidence from curiosity and the orbiters of ancient machinery on the surface,

 

Again, what evidence do you have that they were MORE advanced than us? Got come spacecraft wreckage? Ruins of massive technologically advanced cities? Satellites in orbit? Evidence of colonies on Mars' Moons?

The entire second sentence of your post is nothing but unevidenced speculation and as Hitchens' Razor says "That which can be asserted without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence."

And again, what makes this one of the "some conditions" in which the government should withhold evidence?

 

This one shows the ruins of what could have been buildings. There are definite squares.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6gmEtmxXdI

This is a good one:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DoZHWi1_oA

 

there are many ancient ruin sites on the planet and as I stated wreckage of advanced looking machinery as well working vehicles that are shown in that video on post 63 Look up inca
city on mars.

 

Rocks are the only things in videos. Are you claiming that the "Martians" made spaceships out of rocks?

 

Yes, it is...

 

There are many ancient ruins and evidence of ancient and functioning equipment. Did you ever see the History channel Show earth without people . They said in as little as 100 YEARS the existence of human habitation would be undetectable from space ,a 100 years not 10's of thousands.