The media, like any individual citizen/person, should be held liable for any wrongs as a result of what they do or say.
If a reporter gets a list of our deepest operatives in Russia and publishes it and Russia grabs them and executes.......................you think there should be no repercussions? You don't think that should be prosecuted as espionage? What about a reporter in 1942 who gets it leaked to him that we have broken the Japanese Navies JN25 code and were reading their messages so they change their code launch their attack on Midway and seek the remainder of our Pacific fleet and we have to sue for peace and Japanese controls everything west of the Hawaiian Island and even down to Australia. Or in the Atlantic a reporter learns we have the German Enigma machine and are reading their codes and reports it and their actions in the North Atlantic can no longer be countered and Britian has to sue for peace. Nothing should happen to those reporters?
Seriously, dont care about corporate news so called journalists! But I do believe in freedom of speech and don't think anyone should be jailed for exercising their rights. Speech is the cornerstone of a healthy democracy.
It depends if they violated laws or assisted in violating laws in obtaining that information. No one should be disallowed from publishing anything like Clinton emails provided by russians or whatever so long as they didnt take part in the hacking. The people under confidentiality agreements obviously have to comply with the agreement but if they fail to comply I dont see punishing anyone else for it.
You mean like what happened to Valerie Plame? What happened to those who outted her and put agents at risk? Some insiders say some agents were killed. Is that what you mean?
We have State owned media in Sweden and it is absolutely trash. In a sense, even commercial papers are controlled by the State since it is possible to be tax funded if you share the correct values.
If I can be arrested for yelling fire in a crowded movie theater then there are limitations to what the press can say also, but overall no. The courts and the people have determine that Freedom of Speech has limitations.
B-B-But it was DIFFERENT when Obama did it (and leftists cheered) because . . . well . . . because . . . OBAMA!
Yes and the same for the U.K.; which long ago degenerated into being primarily propaganda mouthpieces for the benefit of the Left and mostly by LAW.
Yeah, Our "Public Service" has this news programme that is directed to kids where the language is dumbed down and the propaganda is fierce. I remember we had to watch it at school back when I was a kid. Can you beat that?
Actually it does not. Criminal libel is against the law, which is weak now. They can be tightened up.