wtc2 flt 175 flight path.

so quite a bit more than a pick up truck huh?

 

how is that parallel to the earth with the left wing so high?

 

One would think that cgi would be perfect

 

God this is painful!
The plane is not sideways on! It is pointed TOWARDS the damn camera offset 30 degrees.

Irrelevant, the downward angle apparent in 2d equivalent to 1.76 degrees will be less than a pixel. You keep ignoring things:

 

nose up and coming down

 

So odd, flat is nose down and perpendicular is axial, my the world is advancing fast!

wth is sideways on?????

beta this is what a plane looks like when its pointed TOWARDS the damn camera!

Its all about understanding perspective.

You owe me a concession, well more like 4 of them but whos counting!

 

Oh? So you want to claim its doing a wing up dive then?

I gave you a 4 hour video on how its done, I suggest you watch it or you will be owing me concessions too

 

Here's something about the "Remotely Controlled Plane Theory" that I'd never seen before.

The Planes On 9/11 Were Remotely Controlled
https://www.brighteon.com/56affbd0-31ac-47f2-b2e6-0a557e2a585f

 

Sheesh, 23 years and nonsense you've "never seen before"? Got any commentary on it, some insight, a one-liner?

You do realize this is a batshit no-plane thread don't you? The comedy author of the book just spews out the same failures about the building collapses, offers not ONE tiny scrap of evidence for his claim - just bare assertion. He makes the lying claim that the plane would have missed the tower if it hadn't banked, but recreated flightpaths using later software show he is wrong:
Flight 175 Hitting World Trade Center 'View from Cockpit' (youtube.com)
And at 9:46