It's becoming common knowledge that the "official" story is complete bunk these days, but, I thought I'd give the shills another "inconvenient truth" to run from and avoid. http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/541-barasch.html
Apparently it's becoming common knowledge that in the ae'truthy' organization,that there's a sucker born every minute
Which of his (multiple) opinions do you find the most valid? List one or two and why you support them.
Q: What did 911 gain the US? What did the Mid-East wars gain us? A: Nothing, just debt. Most oil contracts went to China. Rather than stipulate the US attacked itself, it's more likely that the terror plot was more complex than the official story tells. There was probably a van full of explosives in the towers. Just because the real store might be complex doesn't mean the US killed it's own people for vague oil prospects.
No teacher...I won't. The reader can gain knowledge themselves simply by reading it and interpreting it for themselves. With me, you have no other objective than to look for distractions or create them by asking spotlight shifting or pointless questions. Show me evidence when I ask for it and perhaps I'll consider your rhetorical shifts. You don't so I won't. Sounds fair, doesn't it?
Sucker born every minute? I'm sure that's what the "official" BS story defenders thought too, when they presented their BS.
Since the original poster is impotent on opinion, I'll ask anyone else who read the link: Which of his (multiple) opinions do you find the most valid?
The US as a whole gained very little, but certain international corporate entities made bank, and continue to enjoy large profit margins due to the on going conflict. Which one do you work for? I have no doubt many of our elected and appointed federal officials, have been enjoying large dividend checks since 9/11
Which of his (multiple) opinions do you find the most valid? List one or two and why you support them.
I doubt many read the link...including the one that posted it. Just a reminder...the Commission Report is right on the major points; 100% of the time. Have a good night.
None of the local 'truthers' find any of his points valid at all? That's very telling. Another false 'expert' put forward by a 'truther'.
Just a reminder...candycorn has his fraudelent claim about the commission report debunked; 100% of the time. Have a good night.
Just another reminder, nobody has ever quoted a major inaccuracy in the 9/11 Commission Report. We now return you to HFD's lie-fest.
You know, each time you bring this up, you only remind the readers again that you are lying and you were clearly shown how the report is seriously flawed and the "innacuracies" you demanded to see were in fact pointed out. Just because you put your hands on your ears singing la la la la doesn't mean you weren't shown. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/193580-commission-report-remains-100-all-major-points.html
You asked this ages ago and I answered you. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/197170-richard-gage-demands-better-income-3.html In addition to the unsubstantiated speculation about the plotting and financing of the attack, also add claims about the alleged "wall" between intelligence agencies, the existing protocols being to blame about unable to handle such a situation, lack of warning and foresight about the "surprise" attack etc.
It was almost as if the organizers of the 9-11-01 attacks were advanced demolition engineers due to the precision of the collapse of the buildings and it does lead to the possibility of a conspiracy theory. Awesome avatar, RtWngaFraud, if I haven't said that before.
