Yet ANOTHER architect dismisses "official" story

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Aug 2, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,948
    Likes Received:
    1,890
    Trophy Points:
    113
    well its is totally physically impossible for ANY resonabaly properly designed building to "collapse" at a freefall speed regardless of cicumstance.

    the only way that can be accomplished is through demolition techniques.

    these bozos out here cannot supply any examples of it either though they will try to find something they think they can get you to believe defies physics or even try and sell you snake oil physics when all else fails.
     
  2. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Details, details....they're not concerned with the details.

    Only the agenda, the distractions, and the poisoning of the truth well.
     
  3. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yet the towers didn't fall at 'freefall' speed.....that's just another sexy sounding buzzword usurped by the truthers
     
  4. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    They fell incredibly close to free fall speed. You guys would to paint the picture that the opposite is the case. IT ISN'T.
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Interesting. If I recall my Jr. High school science, there is no such thing as 'free fall speed'. No wonder 'truthers' can't get even the most basic facts right.
     
  6. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your Jr. High science should have also taught you that free fall only occurs in a vacuum. (until 9/11 came along that is). Another 9/11 first, as science is stood on it's ears by the "official" BS story.
     
  7. ChrLz

    ChrLz Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ok, parachutists, etc please note. RWF has decreed that your common usage of this phrase is not correct and must not in future be used on Earth. Thanks for your cooperation.

    Hey RWF, ever thought about getting up and going outside and partaking in the real world? You might even meet some folk with *real* experience in the doctrines that you only encounter at conspiracy sites, and realise your semantics are a meaningless waste of bandwidth..

    Just like.. oh never mind.
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, in fact they fell seconds longer than 'free fall' speed,that's a fact
     
  9. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    As pointed out by one of your fellow Ozians, there is no such thing as free fall speed And what do you mean by "fell seconds longer', ?

    How long is seconds longer?
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't live in Australia.

    The answer to your question is 'several'.
     
  11. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    "the defunct"?, you wish.

    History is peppered with persons who did not allow the majority to shout them down, or oppress them into submission. They in fact made history time and time again.

    It was less than 5% of the American colonies population that fought, won and created this country. Those people envisioned something worth sacrificing themselves for. The rest of the colonists were happy to let the king decide their fate. Their self interest and decision to not rock the boat, is the same thing we have in you Ozians.
     
  12. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Didn't ask you.
     
  13. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's a public forum. Live with it.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm not a citizen of any province in Australia, I'm an American citizen.
    Definitions of "Ozian Terminology"

    What percentage of the American population are 'truthers', in your opinion?
    What percentage of those are 'fighting'? (As in activism)

    Where are you being 'shouted down' or 'oppressed'?
     
  15. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    In forums like this by shills?
     
  16. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No one here is shouting you down or oppressing you.

    Try again.
     
  17. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Squashing free speech, muddying the waters, derailing truth 24/7....whatever you want to call it.
    Purposefully spreading disinformation to further the "official" agenda while pretending to be an ordinary Joe. What's it called..."officially"?
     
  18. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where has your free speech been 'squashed'?
     
  19. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's been edited right here, and continually impeded by shills, who claim not to be shills. I call that a form of "squashing".
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You are impeded by shills? Someone is standing by your keyboard and editing your posts?

    Shocking!
     
  21. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So that would be "no", you have no proof, just crippling paranoia.

    Figures.
     
  22. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I play the best hand I can against a stacked deck. What can I say?
     
  23. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Have you considered saying Go Fish?
     
  24. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ridicule! How unexpected!
     
  25. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Keep shuffling that deck, you'll eventually find that victim card you're looking for.
     

Share This Page