You vote Sanders Are you going to Vote Trump Now?

Hilary, is worse than Trump, and the Muslim world will look at a woman in power here as a green light to attack us home and abroad.

(No pun intended)

I think illegal immigration is illegal for a reason, and we should suspend the Syrian refugee influx until we can be sure who is coming into our already fractured and wide open society. They just found a nest of terrorists in the camps in Turkey, you really want to risk 20,000 uninspected visa's?

None of that is racist, and 6 people opposed to the standards of a university contract are 6 idiots, not a lawsuit, a federal judge should know that.

"African American", was the wrong term, he should have just said; "My (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)!!, you feel me?!!".

PS

Anti-Trump, doesn't make you a superhero able to punch who you like without paying for it, so show the little ese hitting the guy in the head as much as you showed the cowboy elbowing the brother man!

Why would you wave a Mexican flag and burn an American one at a Trump rally? This isn't Sinaloa!!

Media is bias, and women are just fem crazy! They want a queen in the oral office!

PSS

Bill (mac daddy) Clinton, do you want him to become histories first; "First Gentleman"? The guy who got head in the oral office....

Is that why they got the black vote?

 

Obvious troll is obvious.

 

Ah, NO!!!! Although I could be convinced to vote for a less FLAKY and more politically SAVVY version of Donald Trump. That man is a goofball.

 

Likely they will write in Sanders...which IS a vote for Trump.

 

Hillary promised new infrastructure if elected. A new bridge for every troll.


"Okay those of you on the left side of the room are charged with being former republicans that have seen the light. Those of you on the right side of the room are charged with pretending to be really obnoxious racist conservatives that people won't want to be associated with. Those of you in the center, just cut and paste what we have given you and, under no circumstances, do you engage the unclean message board masses with a response to a reply to one of your threads."

 

I know so stop it please...

 

He said as he trolled my post. lol

 

I voted for Sanders.

I refuse to vote for the same thing we have had. The non-partisan, non-change for the better, pro-corporate and non-regulation democr....(I mean)...oligarch candidate.

 

In my 8,677 posts thus far, at least 5K of them include some degree of smart-assery. It isn't my job. It is my nature. And you?

 

I saw the post and first thought was "troll". Most people find swastikas in bad taste, but certain "hardcore" leftist love sporting them as their avatars.

 

Yep, especially when they are brand new posters. Most for realsy hard core racist try to fit in a little out of the box before their special condition comes to the forefront it seems.

 

Spoiler Alert!!

(in regards to the picture, for the only 4th grade educated)

Hilary and the Move On crony movement are Hitler and her Youth.

*sighs*

And the crowd said: "DUUUH!!"....

 

The funny thing is you don't get why your pic is in bad taste. I'd say the same thing to a drone that tried that with Trump. Some people will look for any reason to sport a swastika.

 

Some people will find a racist where none exist, but to each his own.

 

If you want, I'll go over your whole OP and tell you why you look like a troll. Maybe it will help your troll skills. You try to be racist and sexist in an effort to paint Trump supporters as racist/sexist/etc/etc/etc/etc.....

 

I'm not a psychology major, so forgive me if that makes no sense to me. Sometimes a picture means what it seems to imply. Hilary, controls the voter base like the pattyroll controlled a plantation. Her underlings are afraid to jump the farm because the consequences are sever. Violence is the Move On culture warrior's weapon, and when they act up the media ignores it, but when an obvious hater is hit by "some guy" in a Trump rally we gotta watch it for like three months.

You seem to think I'm doing a disservice to who? Ethnic minorities with my artistic muse. I'm saying wake up.

The plantation owners were southern whites, Hilary lives in New York a few years and what....she's Billy Yank now?

She's Johnny's baby girl, don't be a fool!

 

Fo Sho

you wanna post swasticas, whatever man, go for it. Freedom of speech still mostly exist.

I think you give Hillary to much credit. She's more of a player, and whatever global enity pays the most, wins her support.

The pic is just 1 element of your post that tipped me off.

This is the kinda stuff that gives you away. We, on the right, believe each person is an individual. We don't group people and apply stereotypes. White people this, black people that, Asians another.

 

I'm going to have to take that as an insult, but I'm not a reporter so I won't flag it.

There are individuals, then there is the mass opinion. Hilary, carried most of the black vote, and a good portion of the female vote. Is that generalist to say?

Likewise, if I say a thing (type a thing) is it my fault that it gets misconstrued by personal or mass inability to comprehend what's read (heard)? I think not, neither is an allusion to a past history that actually took place in this country, nor would I be wrong to say for instance; that the program "Roots" is in poor taste as-far-as timing goes by the network, unless that network is pro-Hilary trying to set opinion with propaganda designed for a certain demographic.

Now, was that racist? Did I tiptoe around educated phrase to accentuate a flaw in the limitations of perceived faculties, or was I just talking? And who would be the worthy judge of that?

If I said it, that was my right to say it, nor is it my place to assure a soft pallet would greet each soliloquies listener with a happy chide. Mine is the voice of the right, so far as I will not tolerate the pretense of the false left neo-captalist-plutocratic-feminist-wing of a certain elite sector of a party in no way representing the people or any minority.

I decry the selfish and base nature of the right and the left, but choose the greater of those evils as my target of contention.

I'll not sugar coat nor embellish without need, the things I feel in my soul. And if my black brother has an ear, let him hear, for I used not a coarse or vulgar line of slander as unbecoming the abidance of amiable conversation. I committed no crime, but directed his particular personal preclusion. It is he/she my sister or my friend, who then decides the merit in the wisdom I impart. For the which, I should not be chastised, but relegated a master of arcane providence. A specter emboldening the lower classes who I deem not ignorant, but more that able to extricate the mean in my verse.

To put it into simpler terms....

I remain Jeffersonian to the quick, however one chooses to understand or misunderstand that reasoning. Is he the hated owner of several men and ladies of a certain descent, or is he the man who willed all at the end to the very seed of his fascination and eventual love and remorse.

Or is it neither, but the simple logic of the man in office that likewise denounced the tyranny that may arise. Have I seen it in my day, arisen as the savior on his perch? I pray not, but I dare any to defy the specific signs of demagoguery exhibited by the leftest fanatics of this era. To then question my logic as if there be some veiled speech whilst the simple allow the plan English of a patriot at play to escape their hearing.

None of which would be my thought or intent.

Lest the latter be overshadowed by pageantry unneeded to strike the cords of the just.

If notes rings sour, it is the fault of any other, but me.

 

All good brah, truth hurts

Pretty much agree. There are people that think for themselves (individuals), and people who “depend” on others for their opinion (collectivist). Alpha VS Beta

Nobody should care what skin color another citizen has. Soon, we’ll have technology that can make your skin look like rainbow bright or any other color or pattern you can dream of. The lines of race/sex are being blended together. If you care more about women than men, doesn’t that make you sexist?

Sounds like something politicians say. I said this, and did that, but it’s your fault because you misunderstood what I was sayin.

History is history. The only constant is change. I think doing things like this appeal to hatred and most Americans are not hateful people. It’s still a free country for now, so go for it.

 

You seem to think you have this super ability to peer into the minds and hearts of other people online. You'd be wrong about that, but bless your heart, it's cute.

I will admit this. According to the voter tally's. They would have a 58% chance of being a Hilary supporter, but that's presupposition with mathematical deduction. I wouldn't say race or gender played a role in my personal opinion.

For a right winger, you seem to be very narrow in your view of who "we" are.

I'm right wing on most issues, but social inequality is high on my list of change in need of happening.

I'd vote Sanders if that would come about.

Trump is an idiot about a lot of things, but he is a good manager and he'd bring work back to mostly government workers in the middle class.

Not sure he is truthful about cracking down on the corporate sector or that a tax break there is a good idea, but he doesn't have to read a teleprompter to knew where he stands on every issue.

I'm just wondering what gives you the right or the gall to invade republican threads as a republican and label the poster what you think they are.

Are you a CIA annalist...pffft! Ha, ha! sorry...of course you aren't.

The word for today class, is; "Inflection", exemplified most commonly in written sentences as, a comma.

 

I know a “collectivist” when I see 1.

So you don’t see a chick and think “58% chance Hillary supporter”? Do her odds change based on race? I agree when I meet someone, there race/sex/religion don’t factor. It’s who/where/why. “Never judge a book by its cover” was a motto that stuck with me when I was a kid.

I’m a right winger because I draw my own conclusions. Among the right there is no group speak. We have no leader. We debate our ideas in the arena. I fight with my fellow conservatives as much as I do liberals (collectivist).

Me too. My friends hella scoff at me for it but I don’t want anyone tied to the global socialist establishment in office. If it was Jeb VS Hillary, it wouldn’t matter who won because they’d both do the same.

Trump is at least not sold out.

I’ve seen the tactic of leftist puppets come in and try to act like conservatives, sporting swastikas and whatnot. I’ll hand it to you, you debate like an individual. I may agree/disagree with you, but I’ll fight for your right to say it.

I do look good in a black suit…

Everyone is anxious to smash there first million dollar Hillary bot. Maybe I jumped the gun… Maybe…

 

I'm not keen on the answer each line in turn style you choose. It seems too guarded and devoid of natural flow. It also kind of makes me feel like you are setting yourself on some higher plane of thought (which I obviously don't think you belong on). I can understand you if you just hit me with a paragraph. I read Ovidius Naso for fun. When I say that Hilary is a nazi, I'm only half joking. The establishment are not the old school race hater nazi, but National Socialism is where they are headed. They have relegated it to two classes. Have or Have not. But the tactic in the grand strategy is to keep us factionated so we don't reach a unanimous consensus.

I divide my writing because I've been accused of dropping a wall of text on screen.

I only mention race, because that's what the left use against the Trump base. I figure the black community as a whole (and I don't agree that individualism is as prominent as you say) because we are conditioned in every aspect of life towards unilateral agreement in social manipulation. The reason we are so easy to divide is because all of us. The sexes, the gay community, the Latino, the Asian, Black, and White communities are fed cultural acceptance modalities in popular culture while the separate divisional overtures are given to the individual segments as a collective within the American collective.

This is by design of super genius psychologist eugenic social sciences. So that we feel American, and as you state it, we would hope most of us don't have a divisive nature. So, it is the systems role to inject division. And darned if it doesn't work like a charm in court cases, or elections as well.

Sometimes they get lucky and racist, or sexist, or homophobic events unfold as a bonus to the set parameter. When that happens, the media step in. They stir the pot to a boil faster and set the public opinion without the public really understanding they are being influenced.

All so we will remain individuals obsessed with ourselves, our family, and our possessions and property. But we are all collectivist to a degree without being any more than subconsciously aware. The point being, as the "People" we should be united. And we will never promote a set of power reducing clauses on the government if we can't agree who is friend and who is the foe. It's rich and poor. Poor is now swiftly becoming 4-10 million in your personal account.

You aren't even considered actually rich anymore. No regulation means the spikes on the products sold are 500% or 5k over the cost of production. The monster that is the seller's market. The Hilary and Mitt Romney enablers and population handlers of the polity, and the underlings of corporate interests who own even the somewhat wealthy. There is no limit on industry they can angel seed investment dollars into. Sanders wanted to address that.

All most conservatives want to talk about is reduction on social programs. But in the individualism of the collective blueprint, they can't see that the system they champion through supporting austerity is public enemy #1.

As long as the well off see the lower crust as sucking from them what they are entitled too, the whole nation can't get on the track to destroying the plutocratic oligarchy that rules our democracy. These people have ego's that make them think they are gods. They have plans of mining on Mars and the Moon, and it will take sucking up trillions to get to the point where they rake in trillions monthly.

Clinton, Obama, Bush....they are all the same name, party, clone...

The real struggle is class struggle. Not race, sex, or gender.

I don't give a heck about that trivial stuff. Socialism is horrible I agree. But the government is that horror already in the direction of upward cash flow.

The trickle in the trickle down economy we have is near to completely cut off through outsourcing and internal choice over assigned labor, and union means little when the seller can manufacturer elsewhere without the hassle at lower rates.

Then they get on TV and talk about a committee being put together to solve the national debt. But all they want to do is dissolve the already limited social programs, fire thousands, ship more jobs out of the country, tax wadges on all domestic labor, and they try to sell this crap to the public about how our tax dollar needs to be better allocated.

When a 5 year old can tell you the tax on income is an unjust Civil War relic, and the real tax needs to be on corporate earnings.

But race doesn't matter. Many plenty black men and women, and asian, and latin, and jewish, and arab people are in the echelon.

It's just about your net worth. The fed is empty virtual space and money not even real in that world. They use the federal coffers to suck up private holdings. Capitalist vampires, who do not think about anything but now and how much better tomorrow will be for them and their "Royal" children.

They eat the brain foods only they can afford with mononucleosis brain foods and go to school because they can afford it, coming out with no debt. Buying the banks, the debt, and the property rights to everything.

The fact that they obviously don't want Trump to win, is why he gets my vote.

Maybe he is a Caesar, inside the wealth circle, but on the side of the common man. If he takes us along for the ride, let him become, Midas.

Socialism is bad, but we have never seen it work under our constitution to reverse the overreach of congressional, court, and mercantile power.

I'm a revolutionist. I love the idea of America, but not what she has become. I just want all of us to have it good, I don't need to have it all....

 

We’re all individuals. I don’t like your “write a book as a post in obscure style” style you choose. I do what I do because people try to post false premises through out there whole argument. I then attempt to engage the very premise of your opinion with my own and try to obtain a higher premise to the argument. You write books, I’ll engage every thought so you can’t hide

To tell ya the truth, it’s a lot simpler then that. I pretend we are having a conversation/debate. You make 1 point, I make one point. If I agree with you I either skip it or say I agree.

BURN!!!! That’s like an insult n stuff

If your paragraphs formed complete thoughts rather than 1 point built on a page long house of cards. If I accepted any premise that I “feel” is untrue, what is my opinion worth?

Even more reason to think you COPY/CUT/PASTE. I don’t know who Ovidius Naso is and I’m 2 lazy to google it.

BEST POINT U MADE.
Tell me, why would you think Hillary is a “nationalist”?
I call them Gazi’s (global socialist). They are citizens of the “world”. They are above stupid Americans etc… etc… etc…

SHOCKING!!!

Send me your weak, your tired, your huddled masses, earning to be free blah blah blah…. It doesn’t say, send me 100 these, 200 those, 6000 thems… America becoming a welfare state is the end to freedom as we know it.
I’m gunna give up here and tell ya that you post like my GF ask me a question. She be like, Can I ask you something?... and I be like, “sure baby” and then I have to listen to 3 hours of back story before I find out she wants to know if I like coors lite or but light.
Just make your point, and make it sharp.

 

Maybe that's the whole problem. I'm a girl now, and you can't listen, or finish a simple conversation.

Why begin one in the first place?

Are you just trying to get a laugh from future posters or do you care about any other point of view that doesn't begin with your personal opinion?

Political debate, I never asked you anything, lest it was rhetorical and needed no answer.

Consequently, you missed out on the meat of the topic, and it's pretty shameful attention spans have rotted so vastly in the 2000's.