http://www.tmz.com/2017/12/27/last-...za-shlesinger-sued-sex-gender-discrimination/ Not especially funny comic Iliza Schlesinger is being sued for actually barring male customers from her new show "Girls Night With Iliza---No Boys Allowed". Why do people forget which century we are living in and think they can simply discriminate against fifty percent of the population? And if there was a Larry the Cable Guy show (no blacks allowed) or a Bill Burr performance for striaghts only (assuming these comics would want to turn away half their audience) who would allow that?
The left has added male-guilt to white-guilt. I wonder why the left truly hates itself so much on such an inherent core level?
I disagree. As a small business man myself I believe a company should be able to choose its customers just like customers can choose the company. It is all about freedom. Shouldn't everyone have their freedom protected?
"Iliza Shlesinger is a working, touring comedian. She is Jewish, in her 30s, and she is bitter." "Though Shlesinger said she isn’t a regular synagogue goer — and she admits to throwing an annual Christmas party in her home with all-Jewish guests — she says her comedy is informed by her Jewishness." http://jewishjournal.com/hollywood/190687/ No one should be shocked a pampered, white Jewish feminist is pushing such sexism and bigotry. While most Jews are good Americans, some of the most vile, SJW, anti-men feminists tend to be white Jewish women. Iliza, Amy Schumer, Chelsea Handler are three of the most popular and influential SJW feminists in comedy. They are all white, all come from money, all are Jews. No more excuses.
I agree, but people like this crap comedian would be the first to outraged if, say, Bill Burr did an all-male show.
And let's not pretend you know what I think on this subject. Iliza Schlesinger's topic for her comedy routine is her business. But refusing entrance to her show based on gender? That's not too much different than putting a "no colored people" sign in the box office. Go take your pitiful mind reader act somewhere else.
I agree with that, but the left has made the ground rules and they're severely skewed to favor their pets.
Were you opposed to Roosh's mens' only meeting being forced to cancel by feminist protests and threats ?
I have no idea who or what a "Roosh" is but without any other context I would say a meeting, for some social or political purpose, is different than an entertainment performance which is supposedly open for anyone who has the money to buy a ticket. One is a private act...one is a public one.
how come YOU get to judge people by their religion but say everyone else should judge people not by their race, religion, ethnicity....but by their culture? such hypocrisy from you
the only this can be legal, is if the show was done at a private club. if it is a public business, then it is discrimination.
Title 2 of the 1964 Civil Rights Act bans discrimination based on sex in public accomodations. So yes, they violated Federal law and can face penalties.
Obviously not in and of itself. Perhaps one small unimportant skirmish in that war which is being waged