Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

​

I was in a bookstore yesterday and noticed they were selling the textbook WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B. S., M. S., Ph. D.

 

Really? What bookstore was that? Conspiratards R Us?

I checked Barnes and Noble. They wouldn't touch that crap.

I checked Books a million. They wouldn't touch that crap.

Amazon won't sell the book directy.

On a whim, I put the ISBN into Google. 3 stores. Amazon through a third party, legacy books where it is listed under African Childrens Books, and alldiscountbooks.net which just linked back to Amazon.

So what bookstore exactly were you in? Or are you just lying again to try and con people into buying a book full of lies?

 

No bookstore I've been to that values their reputation.will sell Wood's trash novel,yes novel, not textbook

 

But the Amazon link does show how a self-selecting, overrepresented group can give the illusion of credibility or "controversy":

[ame="http://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top"]Amazon.com: Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11 (9780615412566): Judy Wood, Eric Larsen: Books[/ame]

Comments:

http://www.amazon.com/Towers-Eviden...iewpoints=1&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending

Even a couple of the 1 star comments are wacked, though someone suggests this video:
[ame="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017"]Dr. Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood[/ame]

Which is funny. Maybe it should be added to RWF humorous video thread...

Plenty of places would carry it if there was a demand outside of a couple of cult followers. It would fit in fine in the paranormal section.

 

http://www.moviewavs.com/0084356043/MP3S/TV_Shows/Lost_In_Space/lswarn.mp3​

The textbook, WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr, Judy Wood, B.S., M.S., Ph. D., is not about a conspiracy theory or a theory at all. It is a 540 page textbook about factual evidence, empirical evidence that reveals the truth in a way that is undeniable to anyone who reads it. Dr. Wood's textbook has not been refuted by anyone, nor can it be. Those that choose to focus on hearsay, speculation, conspiracy theories, or unqualified opinions while ignoring irrefutable factual evidence by avoiding it is what keeps a cover-up in place. Diverting the public to arguing between the two false choices of "9/11 Truthers" verses "The Official 9/11 Conspiracy Theory" while ignoring the facts is classic perception management designed to hide and obscure the evidence. Whenever I witness the psychological aspects of group-think in action, (i.e. James Fetzer, Richard Gage, et al.) or when personal attacks are made against the messenger presenting this reality, I hear the voice of Robot B-9, a General Utility Non-Theorizing Environmental Control Robot (GUNTECR), repeating over and over, "WARNING!, WARNING!".

General Martin E. Dempsey​

 

It's STILL not a textbook....it belongs in the fiction section

 

How regrettable that you assume the worst in people. I was simply relating the days events. I just received a letter in the mail today stating that my credit score is 818 which ranks higher than 92 percent of U.S. consumers. Maybe reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B. S., M. S., Ph. D. will increase your credit rating?

 

oh jeeeze.....

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpLbzLzY9HY"]Dr. Greg Jenkins Exposed During Ambush Interview of Dr. Judy Wood - YouTube[/ame]

I am very grateful to Dr. Greg Jenkins for conducting his ambush interview of Dr. Judy Wood, because his agenda actually highlighted the importance of Dr. Wood's work. The amount of effort being put forth to attempt to discredit Dr. Wood and convince people to not look at the overwhelming sum of evidence she has gathered is truly remarkable. I find it very interesting that Dr. Jenkins, who works/worked for NSA, showed up with full lighting and camera crews after a talk given by Dr. Fetzer, who had insisted Dr. Wood attend his talk. No one else knew Dr. Wood would be there. Just as she was leaving, around 12am, Jenkins spontaneously confronted Dr. Wood and asked her to do an interview on the spot. Why didn't Dr. Jenkins contact Dr. Wood ahead of time to get advanced permission for the interview? Why didn't Dr. Jenkins attend the conference, but only showed up at the very end of it for the specific purpose of asking Dr. Wood to do this spontaneous interview? Why did Dr. Jenkins show up with full lighting and camera crews, yet he only brought one black and white photo of the thousands of full color photos, videos, documents, and graphs Dr. Wood has gathered, only to later insert the full-color copy of the image into the edited video recording of the interview?

I find it admirable that Dr. Wood was right all along about the fact that the majority of the WTC buildings were transformed to fine dust, especially considering that she has been trying to wake the public up to that fact for over 4 years now. Others are still catching up, as today it is a commonly known fact that the WTC buildings were primarily turned to dust on 9/11. I wonder if Dr. Jenkins has corrected his false claims that the buildings were not turned to dust, or if he still believes the nonsense he was trying to promote throughout the interview... As Dr. Wood often says, you first need to determine WHAT happened, before you determine HOW it happened. If you skip the first part and assume you know what happened, further discussion tends to be rather meaningless and unscientific. Dr. Wood identified that the buildings were transformed to dust, and for some strange reason, Dr. Jenkins really wanted to avoid discussing that topic.

Dr. Judy Wood held strong in her scientific position all these years, and thank goodness she has. Her observations were correct, right from the start. It was this fortitude of hers which has forced Richard Gage (and others) into finally acknowledging the fact that the majority of the WTC buildings turned to dust in mid air. However, that puts Richard Gage and Dr. Steven Jones in a very difficult position, because thermite does not turn buildings into powder in mid air, nor do explosives of any kind...

Here is the transcript from the interview, which allows for a more detailed analysis of the dialogue: http://drjudywood.com/articles/transcript/Jenkins_transcript.html

General Martin E. Dempsey​

 

You can through the absolute TRUTH at some people and they will always be
"A Doubting Thomas"......Too Bad....So Sad.
Those who can do will do;
Those who can't
will just B..LL SH... their way through
LIFE!:

 

One thing is absolutely certian.....Woods theories and her book are bull(*)(*)(*)(*)

 

Bombs Did Not Unravel the Towers
by Morgan Reynolds
Posted on February 27, 2012

It does not take much, only 1,000 words, to prove five popular theories of World Trade Center destruction wrong. You might ask how I got this smart. True, I don’t look that smart. Here’s my secret:

http://ning.it/z4nmK4

General Martin E. Dempsey​

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anwy2MPT5RE"]Monty Python - Spam - YouTube[/ame]

 

Maybe YOU'VE forgotten posting the same lies over and over constitutes spam...And reynolds left A&M abruply

 

Who told you the evidence in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook are lies? Harry Potter?

General Martin E. Dempsey​

 

a book full of claims without anything to back them up, I consider that lying....and it's STILL not a textbook......works of fiction don't apply

 

Are you ever going to address the issues I raised with her, and by extension your, analysis of the so called evidence that you present? Do you need me to point out which posts you ignored?

 

Barrett versus Reynolds on Bombs Did Not Unravel the Towers​

"You are either a careless reader or a liar." (My money is on the later.)

http://nomoregames.net/2012/02/29/barrett-versus-reynolds-on-bombs-did-not-unravel-the-towers/

General Martin E. Dempsey​

 

http://http://f00.inventorspot.com/images/1559606_340_1116081430036-spam.jpg

 

​

A hasty spell of complex words,
a round about movement of the magic wand,
and lightning fast jerk- your job is all done.​

It wasn't jet fuel, mini-nukes, demolition charges, or super-duper-micro-mini-nano-thermite that "dustified" two quarter mile high buildings that were in excess of one million tons in combined weight. The World Trade Center Towers and its contents (including people) were turned into microscopic dust particles with a Harry Potter spell. And if you don't believe this, then I suggest reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood, B. S., M. S., Ph.D. to discover what did do it. By the way, this textbook is the subject of discussion and not the character assassination of its author.

 

No. The main reason my questions go unanswered is that you do not have the answers to my questions. Either you do not understand the questions, or you do not care to research the very obvious technical problems with Dr. Judy's evaluation of the evidence.

1. Steel is pyrophoric. It cannot be rapidly turned to dust without reacting with the oxygen in the atmosphere and releasing a massive amount of heat in the form of visible light.

2. Dr. Judy Wood has performed no experiment, repeated no results, and published no paper on the subject of directed energy weapon on 9/11. This is not a scientific textbook. This is a picture book.

 

Harry Potter is by far the better written book, based more in reality even though it is a complete work of fiction, has had FAR more readers than the three that read Wood's piece o' crap, and is much more entertaining than reading about some pathetic (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) who is so desperate to sell a book that she has people out there trying to get someone.... ANYONE to buy it!

 

General Reminder to EVERYONE:
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/182771-general-warning-about-section.html

This forum has rules whch ALL members are expected to comply with.

Cenydd
Site Moderator

 

In an attempt to promote generalized reciprocity, and after careful examination of the baseless objections that agents provocateurs make against Dr. Judy Wood and the evidence she presents in WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?, they insist so passionately that a Directed Energy Weapon did not "dustify" the World Trade Center complex that the opposite must be true.

This is just an observation, but why argue about opinions of guesses of speculation of pot shots in the dark ... instead of reading WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? It's like a student trying to take an essay test when they haven't read the textbook and are just BS-ing their way through it. Muddle-up is a form of cover-up whether intentional or not. The evidence that Dr. Judy Wood presents is overwhelming, indisputable, and conclusive.


Tune a deaf ear on Big Brother's thought police and think for yourself. The following videos are helpful in this pursuit.

Dr Judy Wood at New Horizons - Where Did the Towers Go - Part 1
[video=youtube_share;ufWggCESyDg]http://youtu.be/ufWggCESyDg[/video]

Dr Judy Wood at New Horizons - Where Did the Towers Go - Part 2
[video=youtube_share;M4XDN9sY3GI]http://youtu.be/M4XDN9sY3GI[/video]

One Step Beyond (SKY 200) Theo Chalmers with Dr. Judy Wood
[video]https://blip.tv/play/AYLb1nkC[/video]