Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

Spoiler alert:

Turns out Vader is Luke's father, and the Death Stars have fatal design flaws.

 

LOL, directed energy weapons. Yes, two 727 directed into the towers full of fuel.

Does anyone realize that the encapsulated fireproofing was removed long prior to 9/11 due to it's toxicity?

The floors were covered with 4" of concrete to give the firefighters 2 hours to fight a fire before failure. The floors didn't quite last that long due to the huge amount of fuel introduced but they did last awhile. One engineer said while watching it that he knew the towers would fall and that it was criminal to keep the firefighters in the building but no one was thinking clearly on that day.

The major cause of the collapse was full span floor failure which removed the support between the inner and outer columns. Once that connection was gone, there was nothing to hold the buildings together and that is why all three tube in tube buildings collapsed in very similar fashions. You can see it fail at the point of impact and fire and the progression of floor failure ahead of the rest of the building collapse. It came down like a pile driver, one building top falling to the side while the other straight down.

 

Whatever happened to that "pancaking theory" NIST stuck to for so long??

 

So 'directed energy weapons' are more believable than the 'pancaking theory'?

 

Pancaking isn't accurate, as NIST claimed over and over and over. We have a directed energy theory (unproven), and a disproven "pancaking theory" that was to be the best answer they could come up with. The public didn't buy it, so they came up with some other BS.

 

It was a theory, but it was based in science,not some wild accusations of someone with no common sense

 

FEMA made the claim of the pancake theory before any real investigation was done. The NIST disproved the pancake theory. Once again your claims and reality are polar opposites.

Source

 

What do you think the floors did when support failed? Float? LOL

 

​

What is the motivation for deception? You have to read Dr. Judy Wood's textbook that is so dangerous it cannot be mentioned by name if you want to know the truth and for others to realize that it is knowable. How can someone claim her textbook does not have the truth if they have not read it? The burden of proof is on the accuser to cite the exact page and item that is untrue and prove as to why, otherwise their statements are slander or libel. I know what "tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth..." means but obviously some people have difficulty with that concept. The truth does not depend on who supports it. Truth is not a club or a matter of “opinion” or "belief". Neither is truth a political or economic objective. Truth doesn’t have sides. The truth is singular and the truth is unifying. By reading Dr. Wood's research and collection of evidence as compiled in her textbook that is so dangerous that it cannot be mentioned by name the truth is known, so there is no need to "Re-investigate 9/11". If you want unity, then seek the truth by reading her textbook. If you were assigned to do a book report, would you read the book or rely on rumors, conjecture, and uninformed opinions from other people? This isn't about beliefs, it is about evidence.You don't need bombs to take over a country (or an Internet Forum). You only need subversion and destabilization:

"If you are one of a small handful of folks who want to take over the US, you don't just walk in the front door. The US military would get you and finish you off in an instant. Instead, you poof some buildings in NYC and then start a Truther Movement. You get the people in the Truther movement to hate their own government and to get others to hate it, too. You get them to destroy their own country from within. You get them to hate their government so much that they would want any government but the one they have. Then, you walk in the front door and they welcome you with open arms."

It's a beautiful day. I need to eat, shower, then off to the gym for my three hour work out. Have a super nice day ya'll!

 

I've had enough of posts being edited. Shills run this place...Adios.

 

You keep saying goodbye yet you don't leave. So dishonest.

 

Wood is just another nutcase.

http://journalof911studies.com/volu...ergy-Beam-Demolish-WTC-by-Gregory-Jenkins.pdf

 

Just want the truth to be known before you order it edited.

 

Heh, ok. Noted.

Buh-bye.

 

Goodbye oh great leader. Carry on your propaganda and your lies. Keep killing America. You're very effective.

 

Good bye!

Great, where will I get another drama queen? /grumble

 

Two words. Sock Puppet. Truthers don't die. They just come back with a new user id.

 

"It's always funny until someone gets hurt. Then it's just hilarious." Bill Hicks

 

But you already mentioned it by name here on the forum.

Unless of course you misspelled disingenuous and your spell checker changed it to dangerous. That would make more sense.

 

What is the motivation for deception?
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/202657-dr-judy-wood-ph-d-materials-science-9-11-directed-energy-weapons-36.html#post1061196008

It's a beautiful sunny and cool day which is perfect for cleaning windows so I can view my world more clearly. If you see Kay Ewe, give her my best!

 

I don't know. Why don't you call up your hero Wood and ask her why she tries to deceive the weak minded and the gullible? Please let us know what her response is. I am betting her reason for deception is to make a buck by getting lackeys to push her books on forums.

 

Obviously to sell books so Judy can afford her medication.

Right back at you, Jerry.

 

I wouldn't call it deception. I would call it delusion. I have no doubt she believes what she says even if it is counter to the facts. Besides, people like you will buy (or prostitute) the book. Good for the bank account you know.

 

Dr. Judy Wood and the future of the earth: Part I
By Eric Larsen
Posted on May 10, 2012 by Eric Larsen

Everyone knows what’s wrong with the poor remnant of news and analysis that the mainstream media still manages to provide—that it’s untrue, servile to its corporate masters, and intended to deceive rather than reveal.

But what about the alternative? What about the commentary, analysis, and editorializing that’s available mainly (or only) on the Internet, where the “free” worlds of speech and journalism still exist? How insightful are the writers there—and how reliable?

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/5850

 

Evidence is evidence. You can analyze it, ignore it, form conclusions about it, form opinions about it, but you cannot PRODUCE evidence FROM opinions.

If you have formed your own opinion about what has happened based on reviewing the evidence and if your opinion contradicts the evidence, it is not the evidence that is wrong; it’s your own opinion that's wrong. Evidence cannot be wrong. It can be wrongly interpreted, to be sure; and it can be incomplete. However, the issue of incompleteness applies in spades to the official attempts to explain 9/11; yet, debunkers seem willing, on a grand scale, to overlook that incompleteness, even though the incompleteness factor has been openly acknowledged, admitted and otherwise disclosed. The overwhelming & indisputable evidence contained in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook only leads to ONE conclusion. The World Trade Center complex was "dustified" by a Directed Energy Weapon. End of story.


Another beautiful day awaits me. I need to eat my high protein breakfast, shower and get to the gym for my 3 hour work out. Have a wonderful day y'all!