The Silent War Against The White Race.

Um.. so how WERE they 'racists' then..?

 

No Jack, you're lying. I never implied or suggested that that rape was payback. What I did suggest was that any deep-rooted black hatred towards whites was born couched in a violent, oppressive and very recent past. You made that up. The attitude of some blacks to whites is fundamentally no different to the attitude of the Zionist settlers you despise so much.

 

He's not paranoid when he says that blacks are six or seven times more likely to rape and kill.

That is a statistical fact.

Why don't you even want to wonder why? Other blacks do, decent black people. But you get all bent out of shape when presented with facts and start raging.

- - - Updated - - -

What do you mean?

 

One, small observation if I may. Jazz, as you correctly state, did not originate in Africa, but it did have its roots in the Blues which evolved from the African folk music imported with slavery-in the same way that Bluegrass evolved from Eastern European Polkas, and Irish and Scottish traditional music into the forms we hear today.
Jazz evolved from African music.

Mods; apologies for veering off-topic.

 

This is so ironic. In what way are you 'superior'? No offence to you personally, but do you realise that your country is seen as Israel's (*)(*)(*)(*)(*), and an corporate fascist state?

 

But that's not the way you use the term. You throw "racism" around against people who do not believe in superiority. You use the word against anyone who does not share your anti-white genocidal worldview.

Your anecdote is noted. I've seen the exact opposite. Most white nationalists simply believe that whites should have a place to call home, like every other race.

You mean to say "white racists". Blacks and other racists have high levels of racism in their communities, and anti-racist whites are too cowardly (or politically unwilling) to challenge them on it. That's how we know progressives like you don't actually dislike racism - only white racism. There's no political benefit in it, for you.

LOL, this country got to where it is because of the advancements of white people. The same with Europe. Asia got to where it is because of the advancements of Asians. These areas are all much, much more advanced than any black or Hispanic country in the world.

Your attempt to shift the goal posts has been noted. There are physiological differences that make black people better runners. That's why they dominate sports like running. Here's a nice liberal source for you that agrees with me.

Yet we as capitalist white Americans would get along better in socialist Norway than we would in Niger.

We are superior because we had strong white majorities for most of this country's history. That, and we were the only country to have a functional economy following World War II. The demographic virus took root in 1965 and it's been downhill ever since.

 

No. This is my serious face.

yes we do. Everything is in English by default, even if other languages are used as well. English is the defacto language here.

...with a GDP to match. We have the largest GDP in history, almost twice that of the #2 nation (China), despite the fact that they have five times our population. Our companies rule the top 500 list in the world, completely out of proportion to our population as well. The value of our assets is many times that of our debt.

This is why we still have one of the best credit ratings in the world DESPITE our debt (yes, far better than China)...investors know we are a safe risk.

Yes, black families were definitely better under the Founders' America. LOL

Our middle class has a higher standard of living than the rich of the Founders' day.

The facts speak for themselves...we have the highest immigration rate in world history. People are climbing over each other for the chance to get in. America IS the most desirable nation in the world.

Whatever excuses you want to use, the fact remains, MY America is at the top. Theirs was not.

Are you going to credit cavemen for Greek and Roman achievements next? After all, if they had not invented fire, where would the Greeks be? LOL...gimme a break.

 

Prove this.

Bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

"If amalgamating all people into brown eyes and black hair is what it will take to finally destroy racism, I am ok with that. "

Clearly you have a desire to end racism, and you think genocide against races will accomplish that.

 

Blacks used to produce some good music. I am no expert in the field, but I can recall LOADS of black singers, bands, and genre from the 60's and 70's, which was fantastic.

Not this violent filth that passes for 'music' now.

You must SURELY see that these kids are being exploited, and the people that suffer are those they copy that crap on?

 

Your America murders kids with drones and takes its orders from Tel Aviv.

 

Too true.

If Europe ever came to its senses, I'd pack my bags in an instant. Europe should be the ancestral homeland of European peoples. America can go on with this stupid idea that the whole world can come in and make the country stronger. I'll laugh from a distance as the social experiment fails. Thing is, Europe seems even more demographically (*)(*)(*)(*)ed and further up the ass of Marx than America.

 

The existence of blue eyed Europeans right now proves this.

So the blue eyed population did not die out despite the fact that the initial blue population was tiny compared to the brown eyed norm.

Using your logic, this should not have happened. Using your logic, blue eyes should have died out within a generation.

...and you are equating that with a desire for genocide. You are wrong.

I would be perfectly happy living in a world with blue eyes and blond hair if it will also result in an end to racism. Ending racism is the goal. Blond hair and blue eyes are incidental.

 

So explain why blue eyes among black people is exceedingly rare, whereas it is common among white people (and only white people).

I'm not wrong, at all. You want racism to go away and you believe genocide against whites will accomplish that.

 

...because it does not matter if they do or not. If they believe there are inherent differences between people based on race, they are racist by definition.

If that is true, then your cause is already doomed. Their defeat is inevitable.

That is completely true if you ignore everything else I have said.

I believe I already said all racism is bad. Please read more carefully. Repeating myself wastes both our time.

So why is Europe not ahead of us? They have a lot more white people than us, right?

You only have a fringe source to support your claim?

So did Europeans...why are they not ahead of us?

- - - Updated - - -

The views of the lower cultures do not concern me. We are in a position where we do not have to care what they think about us.

 

Um...because they believed people had inherent differences based on race. I thought I already explained that.

That is what a racist is...it is someone who thinks people have inherent differences based on their race.

 

Nah...you should give that a try, they'd agree with everything you've said so far.

See....the facts you present are not the problem, nor do I disagree with any of them in particular that I checked out myself.

The problem is those facts you use support one of two notions commonly carried around in the uneducated toothless mal adjusted trashy KKK/skin heads of racists on this site...1. Blacks are inferior... or....2. Liberals are responsible for it.

 

Wait, did I just hear this right? A person that "does not hate another race" or "think they are better than other races" can somehow, in your view be classified as a racist?

Is this out of the Oprah Winfrey playbook? I'm not even going to consider this "viewpoint", this here is true absurdity.

Except, our government never exactly endorsed racism as a whole. The 3/5ths compromise shows that even before the civil war, how hard the Northern States(and the Founders in general) opposed slavery.

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1269536/The-Founding-Fathers-and-Slavery

The politics at the time, combined with a lack of public support for the end of slavery made for a very difficult position. To criticize some of the most free-thinking and intellectually superior men perhaps of all time is so blasphemous as to be absurd. Had a single element in the situation changed, the civil rights act perhaps is signed as soon as the early 1800's instead of the 1960's.

http://www.photonics21.org/download/FinalEditionPhotonics21VisionDocument_InternetVersion.pdf

Here's a little of what Europe is doing.

For that matter, look who tops our imports.

http://www.worldsrichestcountries.com/top_us_imports.html

So you were saying about America being superior to those other nations? I may be a Nationalist, but I'm a realist.

I'd disagree, the Asian Bloc has some differences among its members right? The same true for Europeans. It's not that we can't define them, we just simply cannot neatly separate them. Unlike in the Animal Ecosystem where various sub-cultures of animals have distinct differences, there isn't necessarily a distinct difference between similar human beings.

Of course, there is a difference between different Human beings, but it's much less pronounced with the exception of Africa and the Arabic Worlds.. Not that there's anything wrong with that, but from a genetic standpoint, African/Arabs have more pigmentation than the others in a pre-dominate fashion.

That's just observation and obviously has no scientific correlation to "ability" or "skill", I've already denied that thesis.

But there is a reason for acknowledging various different social groups. Not all men are created the same. All men have been created with their own, unique and individual talents.

Same can be said for your assumption(and others) that those who are nationalistic are inherently racist. Or that ROFL, someone could hold a different viewpoint from yours and you can acclaim it racist. The proof that we're not, is just how patient we've been with our "opposition".

I wouldn't necessarily call it "Socialistic" per say, when you review it in its entirety. If I could dub an economic term for it, it would be "Equal Opportunism".
Corporations, businesses and people are all apart of the same economic cycle. Hitler acknowledged this, and formed his economic thesis on that fact.
Whereas Capitalism or Communism sees these entities as separate, pits them against each other and the economic system suffers as a result.

These musics are largely attributed to the African-Americans. But I must say and pronounce a great deal of support towards Jazz(and even the Blues). If perhaps the African-American community continued on that positive path, integration into American Upper Class society would have been easily accomplished.

We all know the road they unfortunately took however....

Good, then you'll be happy to know what makes up the majority of our immigration bloc.

http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/08/21/159026833/100-years-of-immigrants-in-america-in-two-graphs

It was mostly Europeans, then Asians came into the field(I'd classify these at first-class immigrants). America is a European-Nation State. The influx of the other minority "immigrants" has unfortunately done nothing but add weight onto the problem as most of them struggle for jobs and to gain a footing.

If you want to use immigration as a means for economic production, then America must be inherently 'racist' and promote our European heritage, as well as the Asian bloc. Accepting the lesser of the immigrants, has just clogged up the system as a whole.

 

Only an idiot would believe that there are no inherent differences between people based on race. I guess the New York Times article that I linked to that talks about genetic differences that make blacks better athletes than whites was written by a racist?

The defeat of anti-racist white cowards? I agree. They actually think black and Hispanic racists are going to buy into their racial egalitarian bull(*)(*)(*)(*). It's about as misguided and ridiculous as their belief that Muslims are going to accept secular humanist socialism as their new religion.

Yes, you say that, but the only kind of racism that you would do anything against is white racism. Your black coworker could be a New Black Panther member and you would just sit there in silence. You might even try and showcase your tolerance by trying to find common ground with him.

I believe I already said we took the lead after WWII while they were rebuilding. Please read more carefully. Repeating myself wastes both our time.

The New York Times is a "fringe source" now? Since when?

Please read more carefully. Repeating myself wastes both our time.

 

0_0....I'm stunned that a person could possibly be this ignorant.

Let me try to make it as easy as possible for you to digest.

You probably think that a person's "differences" is based off of their thoughts, opinions, IE: By their own persona, correct?

Going off this premise, let me ask you something:

Where does a person develop his thoughts, opinions or world viewpoints?

Here's an ah ha moment: From his family, his peers, his co-workers. Most of whom, ironically enough: Share the same race.

To be sure, with our immigration system there's quite a few inter-racial relationships, but the deepest, the most fundamental emphasis on one's mindset comes from one's family, and thereby their "racial" views.

To deny the racial outlook of a person, is to deny the very fact that they exist.(Which was harped on quite a few pages ago), it's illogical.

Stop it. Racism isn't the same as self-identity. Racism is an attack on other people strictly *because of* their race. Not the acknowledgment of race itself.

 

I belong to Plaid Cymru, and am devoted to reviving our own language and culture. Avoid assumptions.

 

I wish Plaid Cymru would get a landslide victory and secede, along with Scotland ande Northern ireland join the south.

 

I'm afraid we'll just stay in Europe, where we've always been.

 

Keep dreaming skinny.

In the 20's, the Klan was huge, relative to the general population. What we're seeing today is a last gasp of growth of shriveling white supremicist groups...and that's only because a black President is in the white house, and the racists can see the writing on the wall.

We're entering the last rinse cycle that will cleanse rational American society of the filthy racists.

I'm not against white people, I am one myself, and live in multi cultural harmony because I chose that instead of ignorant hatred,

I'm against angry brainwashed racists of all races.

Squeeky wheel gets the grease

 

Keep dreaming.

Nationalist groups are growing at double digit rates all over Europe. The inevitable backlash to progressive anti-white race genocide and multiculturalism is coming.

 

Actually, we Nationalists are growing because Democrats and Republicans are failing miserably at their job. That and as Brewskier said, multiculturalism is an affront to all cultures, including ours.

What, exactly is desirable about the sums of Detroit or North Philadelphia? What's desirable about lesser educated people who frankly have little to no desire to cultivate anything.

You can't even call it a culture! In three simple words: Its EPIC FAIL.