The Silent War Against The White Race.

[video=youtube;lCCsAarSkhA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCCsAarSkhA&feature=player_embedded[/video]

 

You know, it's doesn't matter what physical/mental/cultural differences may exist between the races, or where they come from. The point is, y'all don't like blacks, enjoy feeling superior to them, and have some funny idea that it makes any difference to anything what the racial make-up of this or any country is in the future. This physical difference stuff, and all the rest of it, and just rationalization for the pre-existing emotion-based ideas.

I'm not going to argue with you with any thought that you'll see the light. Identity-think is pretty persistent. But I'll point out some little flaws in your logic from time to time, to benefit any impressionalble folks that may be reading....

 

Your self-congratulatory contributions are not persuasive, neither is your lame "ya'll don't like blacks" superiority dismissal. Blacks exhibit unacceptable levels of pathology in what should be a civilized society. Either you tolerate and dismiss that fact, or you don't. If you fall into the latter category, you'll get stupid comments like the above from the former.

 

I don't say ignore pathology. I say understand where it comes from. To a large extent, it comes from persistent myths that blacks are inferior/repulsive/stupid/morally bad, and so on. The disabilities that damage black people and keep them in poverty are in large measure inflicted upon them by the culture.

 

Ah, so the problems that black people cause are the fault of whites. Of course.

 

this thread deserves a good hip hop soundtrack

[video=youtube;mYot-cFNJXM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=mYot-cFNJXM[/video]

 

It makes it fringe. It is not a mainstream viewpoint.

You're welcome. I never hid it though. I have said this openly for some time on here. I am biased against white racism more than other forms of racism. I consider it worse.

Jealousy is an ugly emotion.

We do not constantly lose the wars we wage.

I would argue that we are actually more aggressive and violent than the Europeans. That is one of the reasons we have defeated them so consistently (and avoided being invaded). Freedom means more to us than it does to them.

The article you linked to was not a NYT article.

And in any event, it is hardly a majority viewpoint at the NYT anyway...so I am not sure what you were trying to prove with it. It is not mainstream either way. It is fringe.

Here is what your own source says:

So even your own source says it is not a racial thing, but something specific to a region within Africa. It is not saying all blacks are predisposed to be better runners...but only blacks tracing their ancestry to Western Africa.

And if your theory is true...why are African nations not leading everyone else in running sports?

They might be.

 

Because that is what the word means. I did not invent it. Go read your dictionary.

Whether your are glad or not is not what makes you a racist. Read the definition.

 

I didn't make any such simplistic assignment of fault. Culture passes itself along pretty 'automatically,' without anyone have to intend it or or incurring moral fault from that. the American culture in all it's varieties contains the myths I mention, and others. So do other world cultures.

The song that says people have to be carefully taught to hate is, alas, an example of liberal BS. People hate easily, they have to be taught not to.

Moral fault comes when one elaborates racial myths into major parts of the ego-identity structure, consciously promotes them, and gets aggressive and hurtful towards others on such basis.

 

You know, I gotta admit Brewski...I want to be mad at you, and dislike you, but for some reason, I don't....or can't....I dunno....

But...I wouldn't move to any neighborhood that is poor. It doesn't matter the race of who lives there. Because poor white neighborhoods suck too.

East Oakland is an affluent black/asian part of town, and for blacks in that area, they don't have high incarceration, crime, or illteracy rates.

It's all about the money, not the culture or race.

 

In your opinion maybe, in mine it would be deemed a remarkable and blessed thing. For one it has brought about many a prophecy in the bible and has drawn us closer to the truth and to the return of the king. Another is it has afforded us some truly gifted artists. Im sure you will appreciate this beautiful song iwant to dedicate to you brucie.

[video=youtube;16zmLC1Ral0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=16zmLC1Ral0[/video]

 

There were small black neighborhoods in the north, like Oak Bluffs on Martha's Vinyard where the Obama's vacation, and those blacks have a crime rate that is comparable to that of Northerners, because culturally they are Northern.
But if you look at a ghetto in one of the big northern cities, like Detroit, those blacks are descended from people who migrated from the South between 1916 and 1930, and they lived in neighborhoods surrounded by people from the South, their culture is that of the South and so is their propensity for violence.

Socioeconomic status is a much better predictor of crime than race, and race only seems to work where it closely correlates with socioeconomic status.

 

So if something is not the "mainstream viewpoint", it makes it not true? Is that what you are seriously arguing? Do I even need to explain how this is fallacious reasoning?

Of course you do. It's the only one that doesn't benefit your Marxist ideology.

Jealous of what? I'm an American too.

We've lost plenty of wars. Vietnam, the War on Poverty, the War on Drugs, and the War on Terrorism.

No, we "defeated" them because they were warring with each other and we came over from across the sea and finished the job. Some Europeans won and some lost in all of the wars you mentioned, so I don't see how you can say we beat Europe as a whole. I'll just chock this up as more jingoistic nonsense on your part.

Feel free to prove this statement. Your baseless say-so and dismissal is not persuasive. You're also free to dispute the scientific evidence presented in either of the sources I've presented so far that supports my argument. You haven't done that yet.

What race of people are likely to be found in Western Africa?

http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/gnxp/2011/06/a-genomic-sketch-of-the-horn-of-africa/

Eastern Africa was home to more caucasoid groups, especially in the northern areas, so it would make sense that mixing occurred more here than in the Western area. Plus, my source mentions that Jamaican and Canadian blacks are more likely to trace their lineage back to Western Africa. Duh... that's where the New World bound blacks were sold from.

Because they are 3rd world African countries.

You should contact Duke University and complain about how racist they are.

 

Why is it immoral for me to not want to live around black people when I know that they are more likely to cause harm to me, my family, and my community, than other races?

 

Then explain why no other race in the South exhibits such a disproportionately high amount of crime. You dodged that once, please don't dodge it again. I'm counting.

No it's not. Hispanics have just as much of their population living below the poverty line as blacks, and are even more likely to drop out of high school and not graduate college. They commit a fraction of the violent crime that blacks do. West Virginia is the 2nd poorest state in the country, and the least educated, yet they are near the bottom in terms of violent crime. The "poverty" excuse just doesn't work.

 

There is no such thing as caucasoid. Any respectable anthropologist or scientist refuses to use this redundant term. Ithink what you are trying to say is that eastern afrikans are lighter skin than western. This would be due to east being closer to Arabia, a dominant civilization. The east afrikans are fairly Arabized, not caucusized lol.

The reason so called american blacks are better at athletics than Afrikans is due to the training facilities in america and scholarships. Europeans like to promote and fund sports heavily. Afrika has more pressing needs like the infrastructure and economy.

 

For arguments sake lets say that so-called blacks have a higher crime rate than hispanics. Why do you think?
let me ask you this, why do europeans murder millions of people around the globe? why do europeans kill the most people when they are only 10% of global population?

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race

I already answered this. Missing from your deliberate truncation of my post.

- - - Updated - - -

Higher illegitimacy, inferior culture, mainly.

They don't. Troll posts like these are why you are so easy to ignore.

 

Indeed! And I look back to the days of my teenage, when we heard Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., tell us all passionately and truly that we should not judge anyone on the color of his skin, but rather on his character! What a timeless and magnificent TRUTH to live by. We should be a completely color-blind society, and when that college kid that was me marched in the streets so long ago, along with thousands and thousands of others like me in support of civil rights in America, that is exactly what we wanted to achieve. But look what we have instead....

It has become a wearisome, depressing thing to be an American today, lolo, but at this stage in life, I'm loathe to try to pull up roots and go live somewhere else, like Wales or Ireland, for instance. That teenage boy that was me eons ago never dreamed in his worst nightmares that this horrible, deadly state of affairs would characterize much of "race relations" in the United States in 2013, but here it is. Nobody wants to talk openly or honestly about it, but it is true, and I wish that it weren't.... Obviously, relations between the races are not the only thing grievously wrong with America today -- far from it, but it adds to the aggregation of miseries that have made our country so sad while, in many ways, infusing us with a sense of despair....

 

Ususally, yeah.

That is the point of peer review in the scientific community. Not all opinions are equal.

LOL! Yeah, my rabid pro-democracy anti-government-control stance is right in line with marxism.

Are you sure?

LOL! You do know that the last 3 were not real wars, right?

Factionalism would be considered another weakness in their culture. They are very fortunate that we are not the war mongers they imagine us to be...taking them over would not have required a lot of effort.

There is a West African race now? When did that happen?

So apparently it is not about race after all eh?

Why would I do that? They are entitled to an opinion like everyone else. Even if it is a fringe opinion. It is hardly illegal to be a racist in America.

 

fact is, blacks are disproportionately involved in crime. That's a fact. But it also depends on what you do with that fact, and how you think about it. If you take that fact, and use it to treat blacks, as a group, with disdain - then you are a racist, and will be rightly labelled as such, as you have been.

If you treat it delicately, and understand that the vast majority of blacks are not criminals, and that they prefer not to be associated with criminal activity, then you are on the right track.

you must also understand that whites are not like other ethnic groups. whites in america represent the majority group--the group who is in power, and has the power to dominate other groups through racism. Thus, it should come as no surprise that white people are put on a much shorter leash when it comes to racism. And this is the way it should be.

 

I'm not trying to pile on Brew...but IMO, there is nothing immoral about not wanting to live around black people, and you've already told me you don't want to live around hispanics.

What I haven't heard you say...is you don't want to live around asians. Their affluence stats are better than whites, so are they superior to whites?

And did you know...that predominantly Cambodian neighborhoods do not share the higher affluence rates that other asian demographics do?....that is because when most immigrated they were predominantly refugees from war and violence prone areas. That combination of violence and poverty takes generations to unwind, and that's much easier with the family structure still in tact. Today, Cambodian neighborhoods in my area still have gang and crime problems just as bad as the worst black and latino neighborhoods.

 

Honest, reasonable, clear. Amen!

 

What a dumb argument. It used to be that the "mainstream opinion" was that the Earth was flat and the sun revolved around it, does that mean it was right?

You realize that the end goal of Marxism was to create a stateless society, right?

According to my birth certificate, yeah I'm pretty sure.

No? Kind of naive.

We fought a Civil War in this country and it was the bloodiest war America's ever fought. We don't have the high ground you seem to think we do.

Dodge noted.

How do you come to that conclusion? The genetic differences in my sources are real. Whether certain individuals live in areas where malnutrition and disease affect their ability to dominate in certain sports is irrelevant. Canadian blacks, American blacks, Jamaican blacks, and other blacks around the world have an advantage in certain sports, due to their genetic traits that link back to Africa.

I'm sure an Academic institution like Duke would take great care to avoid expressing racism. Fortunately for them, your baseless accusations of racism are not actually based in reality, but are a knee-jerk response that results from facing facts that conflict with progressive dogma.

 

So it's a fact that blacks are disproportionately involved in crime, but my choice to avoid living around them or going into their neighborhoods makes me a racist? I'm supposed to just go anyway? That's the expectation?

Straight out of Karl Marx's "conflict theory" school of sociology. The majority is always to blame for the actions of the minority, who is always the oppressed victim. Thanks for giving us a view into the mind of progressivism.