The Silent War Against The White Race.

You really are a white power racist aren't you?

That explains alot.

- - - Updated - - -

You're an epic failure if you believe racists like you and Breskier are part of a movement that is anything but the last green leaves on a dead tree.

I'd do anything I could to chop the tree down.

 

If that's how you describe someone who wishes for his race to not be exterminated via genocide, have at it. It says more about you than it does about me.

- - - Updated - - -

Multiculturalism has already been called a failure by leaders in Europe. Hundreds of thousands of British people moved out of London after its demographic transformation. You really think people aren't paying attention to what is happening?

You guys are scared of whites eventually saying "enough is enough" and voicing their concerns at the polls. You're trying to change the demographics past the tipping point before that happens.

 

Nobody is exterminating the white race...we're just not having kids fast enough.

99% of Americans hate white power racists like you. Why do you think you've been forced under ground? It's not because you're white...I'm white

The die is cast, we're beyond any tipping points, and it's okay with me. I'm tempted to say it's too bad you haven't adapted, but nobody really needs to adapt. They need to just ignore the color of thier brother's skin, and the cultural differences

 

[video=youtube;zcmW2Y-t8HI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zcmW2Y-t8HI[/video]

Is Sir Cameron a racist? I think not.

This is a miserably failed experiment, that, if I'm to give it some credit, is a half-assed solution.

IE: There's some part of it that's correct, in an individual post(or perhaps a thread), I'll share my own theories on how society should be molded.

 

Body count yes, barbarism no. And the body count is due to totalitarianism, not communism per se. Give the Nazis undisturbed access to populations the size of China/Russia, and they'd be up there too.

The dangerous thing is unchecked, centralized, absolute power. It's doesn't matter what propaganda line the Party uses to justify same.

 

We can't afford to, and that was the plan all along. Create conditions for Westerners to not reproduce. Case in point, Greece's tax against families who have children. This doesn't stop non-white minorities from reproducing, though, having the welfare system to depend on.

Baseless claim. You have no idea how many people despise self loathing anti-whites. This is an appeal to majority fallacy, anyway. Multiculturalism has been a failure. Whether most people believe in it doesn't make it any more right.

We're not beyond the tipping point. Maybe in America, but there are still countries where whites hold a numerical advantage that could easily be sustained if the right policies were in place. Cultural Marxism needs to be exposed for what it is before the public's conscience will change. As things continue to get worse, this will expedite the process. There's a reason groups like Golden Dawn are growing at a fast rate.

 

I see, so Nazi atrocities are due to them being Nazis, or whites, but communist atrocities are because of "totalitarianism".

I'll disagree with your opinion on barbarism. Communists were far more brutal than the Nazis were.

 

You're not part of a growing movement, you're part of a intellectually repulsive movement that can't die soon enough

 

I'm not sure you realize it, but you just supported what I said.

Crime is high among poor people.
Asians do well and have a low crime rate.

And you really need to take in a lot more than just skin color to make meaningful statements about crime.
Socioeconomic status is huge, cultural heritage is huge.

Most blacks in the US are a product of Southern Culture, which is very violent and doesn't value human life like northern culture.

 

Yeah, I've only said it like 5 times so far. Are you guys not reading the definitions?

The "racist" label has nothing to do with hate, even though most racists are hateful. That is incidental. The definition does not require any hate at all. Here it is again - http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/racism

You are not going to consider the viewpoint that a racist is someone who believes that "that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement"? That seems absurd to you?

Except that it did. A lot.

Aside from the very obvious example of slavery, you have many examples of segregation that followed it. People WERE legally separated based on race...that is racism. Government endorsed racism.

Racism was endorsed by the government at least through the 60s.

LOL! The 3/5ths compromise was itself racism...it was saying that black people were inherently worth less than white people.

If they were intellectually superior, their ideas would still be dominant. The most successful nation(s) in history have not followed their template.

They were people, not gods. They had flaws like everyone else. They were indeed intellectually superior, but they were morally inferior. Their morality fell to social darwinism...it has been replaced by something better.

Very little. I have seen nothing out of Europe that the US could not also do or has not also done. The reverse is not true.

If the white race was really so superior, the differences should be dramatic...they should be far ahead of us, not struggling to keep up.

Yes. In all the ways that matter.

 

It's not repulsive, at all. Even anti-white progressives won't go live in a black ghetto or a Mexican barrio. They have just enough instinct for self-preservation to avoid these "bad neighborhoods" (using progressive lingo). It's easy to love diversity from the safety and security of a gated white neighborhood.

 

Many areas in Asia have extreme levels of poverty. Why are there no Asian countries on the list of most violent countries?

Blacks are exhibiting plenty of violence in Philadelphia, Chicago, Baltimore, Newark, and the like. Areas that were never "Southern culture" influenced.

 

You never heard of the killing fields of Cambodia, or that thing in China called "The Cultural revolution"?

Where did blacks in Philadelphia, Chicago, Baltimore, Newark, and the like come from, and where did they bring their culture from?

 

We're not talking about wars. We're talking about day-to-day street crime, like we have here in the US.

LOL, are you suggesting that blacks who grew up 3rd generation in Chicago and northern States have the South infused in their DNA?

 

Technically, yeah. It was.

I said it more than once. You people have trouble retaining it for some reason.

There is no good racism. But some forms of racism are worse than others.

Rebuilding from what?

Oh yeah...their obnoxious war of aggression against us. I am sure they will not make THAT mistake again. Even entrenched and with technological superiority they failed to resist us. Defeat must be a familiar feeling to them by now. Half of them were saved by us and the other half of them were brought to their knees by us.

In any event, that is a flaw in their culture. Their insane or incompetent leaders either thought they could wage war against us and win, or they failed to take the necessary precautions to avoid invasion. That has not happened here.

You did not quote the New York Times...you quoted some author of a book. The book merely appeared in the New York Times.

 

Well you know, albeit Americans came from European stock, we are in fact quite different in nature.

This can be measured any number of ways, however, perhaps one of the most telling is respective people's outlook on Israel.

Outwith forums, I have Americans tell me they are sick of this so called 'special relationship' you have with Israel, but they are even more angry that more of their fellow Americans are either asleep to this danger, or even worse, have fooled themsevles in support of them.

I bet if you did a poll across the US and then Europe in relation to Israel/Palestine, you would get v different results among the people. Imo, most Europeans would vote in support of a Palestinian state(the right thing to do), while most Americans would vote the opposite way.

We've had the same(and in some cases worse) propaganda that you have, but for some reason it just does not stick here. I would go as far as to say the relationship between the US and Europe would be so much better were it not for them.

There is just no way I could live somewhere like NYC. I don't hate 'all Jews' as some may lazily say, but I do not like the actions and nature of many Jews. I would not go harm one(that had not harmed me), but I just don't like anything about their culture, to be totally honest.

There are a few exceptions though, there is one Jewish member on here that I have always considered to be among the most under rated PF members. But I do know a lot about their culture, indeed, I have had Jews admit that I often know more about it than many Jews.

As to the immigration thing, there should always be room for some limited immigration, but no matter who is coming in and what race they are, it should have been done sensibly. It wasn't. That is why people are fed up with it. We feel it has been imposed on us, and that it is punitive to us. As it was meant to be. I don't blame the actual immigrants. If someone held open a door for me, I would walk through it as well. My problem is with those that have pushed this agenda.

People like this, for example(see vid).

I truly sense that things are going to change again here, and that in time countries will want control over their own affairs again, including their borders.

[video=youtube;k2Vq_e2Z1ug]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpag e&v=k2Vq_e2Z1ug[/video]

 

I can't imagine why anyone would say different. I don't think you're understanding him well, though, if you think he's supporting your nationalist position.

 

Where does their culture come from?
Culture gets passed on from generation to generation.

 

How?

Of course there are differences, and good that there are.

I am glad of them.

It would be incredibly dull if there was one race and one culture.

In every single respect there ARE differences between the races.

In a cultural sense. In a biological and physical sense. Nothing wrong with that. No 'ism' there.

 

Nah, you're good, I would sooner stick to the topic at hand here.

Thanks.

 

No, Nazi atrocities are also due to their being totalitarian. You misread my point so blatantly I think it's probably deliberate.

The key is this line here, that I'll repeat: The dangerous thing is unchecked, centralized, absolute power. It's doesn't matter what propaganda line the Party uses to justify same. I say this is equally true whether you insert "Nazi" or "Communist" in front of "Party."

 

This one has gone super nova.

 

Ok, does that it make it not true? Why don't you try and refute the arguments that liberal source presented?

Yes, the kind that doesn't benefit progressive ideology is worse, which is why you're only concerned about white racism. The rest all benefit the conflict theory inspired batte between the minority and majority. Thanks for fessing up to your double standard.

LOL, I'm starting to see just how stupid the "USA! USA! USA!" crowd really is. So it's a flaw in European culture that would cause them to wage war? Because we never waged wars, right?

Completely false. The article is a book review written by Jon Entine, a journalist who has written for the New York Times on numerous occassions. It's obvious you did not read the article, at all. There are plenty of other sources that explore the same issue.

http://www.livescience.com/10716-scientists-theorize-black-athletes-run-fastest.html

I suppose they are "racist" too, eh?

 

Many blacks did not come from the South, even in the slavery days. There have been generations of blacks in the Northern states and the aforementioned cities that have little in common with the South. If your theory is true, we'd see high levels of crime amongst anyone in the South, yet we don't see Southern whites committing a disproportionately high amount of crime relative to their population size. Only blacks, and to a lesser extent, Hispanics.

 

It is based on genetics and environment.

You believe that there are a few distinct groups sharing the same genetic traits called "races". Mainstream science disagrees:

Because of the overlap in traits, there is no clean distinction between the so-called "races". So whenever someone uses the term, it will always be subjective, because different people (even among racists themselves) have different definitions. Am I black if I have 1 black parent? 1 Grandparent? 1 Great grand parent? How far back do I need to go?

There is no consensus. Some racists would consider you black if you have one drop of black blood, no matter what your physical traits are.

What if they don't? I have many peers and co-workers of different races.

(A-hA!)

Racial mixing will inevitablly result in the erosion of racist viewpoints, whether or not the individuals actually engage in race mixing themselves. Because there will be no way to avoid exposing the flaws in racist ideology...people will gain anecdotal evidence of their own to counter it.

Why? Who decided that a person's identity must be tied to their race?

Racism has nothing to do with attacking. Read the definition. The word does not mean what you think it means.