911 World Trade Center Tower "Collapse", a new "Demolition" Euphemism!

I am waiting for lefty to come up with some creative bull(*)(*)(*)(*) for a response so I get my nightly laugh! The level of trougher insanity is getting so obvious that even the most dead brain drop out gets it.

 

Do you seriously consider that evidence of something?

Pray tell, of WHAT?

 

Well we all know that you could be sitting on a pile of dynamite and with a serious face look us square in the eye and say what dynamite.

But then thats why you are an expert and make the big money.

 

Evasive answer and does not in any way address the question. There is no evidence of any high explosives or thermite used on any of the perimeter columns.

 

but fema called bull(*)(*)(*)(*) on that.

on the perimeter columns?




so you are departing now on your own fantasy!

 

What the hell has a heat-damaged piece of steel to do with what I said?

 

Now I realize that you are the resident fireman and all things expert, but that is what thermetic material does to steel and iron et al. It causes heat damage. (*)(*)(*)(*)ing DUH!

 

So, where did that piece of steel come from in the building? and where is the proof that was cut by thermite?.. .(...cause thats not what a thermite cut looks like)

 

troughersalways play such childish games or they are simply illiterate?

I never said "thermite", nor does any truther need to prove a "specific" material. it proves nist to be criminally negligent and that is all truthers need to prove.

if that is not the result of thermetic material then what was used? Nukes?

 

So, you claim thermetic material was used....which means you know it was used ....so what thermetic material was used? Let's see your proof.

Point is, you make claims like you have scientific proof and you don't...which is why you waffle.

 

is that what you are talking about?


I dont give a (*)(*)(*)(*).

that argument is as (*)(*)(*)(*)ing stoopid as what grade of fuel was used to burn the house down. troughers are insanely psychopathic.



that looks like something caused the steel to lose its structural bond.

Turned it to dust

 

Well!!!...There you go!

Thanks for admitting you base your claim on absolutely nothing other than "what you think". Thanks for validating your non-existent threshold for evidence.

You're done.

 

yes you are done since every claim troughers have are based on what someone thinks regardless of the source. (*)(*)(*)(*)ing DUH!

Wonderful display of trougher loonacy.

Wow

Just WOW





so why do you continue to quote the trougher mantra?

 

That's how you respond when you can't support your claim of a specific thermetic material. If you know thermetic material was used, then you know what the material was...because the only way you could make that claim. So, what was it?

How did I know you were going to answer that way? That's the problem with Twoofers...they claims they know how it all happened....but they can't supply the details....cause that take work.

 

you simply do not get it do you.

the claim is fire and structural failure

anything observable outside those parameters if YOUR (*)(*)(*)(*)ING PROBLEM not mine.

I never made a claim I knew how it happened. I know how it did not happen and sufficiently proved that in spades.

When matters are not investigated that should be investigated that is criminal negligence as we can see many things outside simply "fire" "collapse".

Hope that help sooth your burning soul.

 

Actually, it looks like the joint snapped under stress and then that part was buried in a pocket of burning Class A fuels.

- - - Updated - - -

You still haven't shown us anything outside those parameters.

 

so you think that a liquid hitting a wall at the speed of a bullet is going to pool and form pockets.

How (*)(*)(*)(*)ing absurd.

Tell us where you are working as a fireman you need to be fired for incompetence.

 

What on earth are you on about?

 

This is your level of evidence and proof. You look at a photo or video and then claim to know all that's going on. Lucky for us, you don't do any medical research. You've already proved you choose to deny physics when it run contrary to your opinion. Why does your opinion count?

 

self proclaimed experts feigning ignorance.

 

yeh thats the odd thing about photos, they have easily determined meaning to those who recognize whats going on. To those that do not, well not so much.

Now I expect most people can see what is going on in the clip below.



Now I would say that agent just got his ass toasted

I guess that makes troughers feigning ignorance just that, more ignorance.

You cant discuss physics with troughers, its been tried many times, its simply beyond their comprehension. Spin and bull(*)(*)(*)(*) they have down pat however.

 

More proof that you are a 'trougher' Jojo. You have described yourself perfectly here.

 

What trougher site did you get that (*)(*)(*)(*) reasoning from?

Are you arguing that the picture does not show that agent getting his ass toasted?

 

Movies do not equal reality. 'The Matrix' is not a documentary.

 

Please try and keep up k?

the subject was:
You look at a photo or video and then claim to know all that's going on.

not (*)(*)(*)(*)ing "movies" OR "documentaries".

Hope that helps.