Shellie Zimmerman ~ *Doubtful of his Innocence*

The friend who sat on the stand changing her story, remembering hardly anything, and wiping the drool from her chin ?
The friend who was left with zero credibility, and became a national punchline ?
The friend who admitted that Martin preplanned to attack Zimmerman with these comments:

That's the friend who's testimony you are going by?
The same friend Margot2 called a "very credible witness" ?

Lolz.....

 

His/her posts are certainly laughable.

 

".. and by the way... she has no way of protecting herself so please be nice to her".

 

That's the difference between you and I. I know I shouldn't own a gun. . .you don't.
And I can disagree with you, maybe even SECRETELY find your comments laughable, but I rather not ridicule you or your friends for your silly need for false safety.

Move along. . .I personally agree to disagree. Leave it at that!

 

Back to your attempts to insult me based on my country of origine?
I don't think that is allowed, don't you know. . .and, by the way, if you know so much about Belgium, why don't you know that the inhabitants of Belgium are called "BELGIANS?"

 

No.. I definitely know you shouldn't own a gun.

 

You still haven't provided any proof of any of your accusations. And the fact that Trayvon Martin had a minute amount of THC in his blood doesn't make him a drug addict.

You are not following the rules by supporting your accusations with FACTUAL, RELIABLE information.
Even the "possession of stolen jewelry" has never been proven (neither as stolen, nor as belonging to him).

In the other hand, George Zimmerman DID have several encounters with the law which were clearly documented, including pushing his wife to commit perjury, assault on a police officer, assault against his former girl friend (and his current wife's father).

 

Yes, that young lady who WAS a very credible witness.
And. . .Zimmerman also said Trayvon talked to him before he "attacked" him. . .so, if the only person you can possibly believe is the known liar, Zimmerman, he too agrees with that statement.

 

Others have. Earlier in the thread. Ignore it all you want.

It makes him an illegal drug user. Fitting the image he was creating on his Facebook, and the conversations involved with others about pot and Purple Drank.

Face it... no one misses him.

"It's not mine. A friend gave it to me".

"pushing his wife to commit perjury" caused a "clearly documented" encounter with the law ?!?

Lol.....

A claim that was withdrawn.

 

If she was the witness for Zimmerman you would be laughing at her as much as Zimmerman's attorneys.
And every late show host that week.

Hell, even some of the black web sites were disappointed she was such a failure as a witness.
Because she looked like a moron and had zero credibility.

Yes, we know this... Martin asked Zimmerman if he had a problem.
When George said "no".... Trayvon said "well you do now". Then he attacked him.

You aren't telling us anything we don't already know.

 

I don't care about your opinion of guns.... it's the rest of the stuff you said that was mind-blowing. You'll give in to being raped/beaten in favor of the rapist being allowed to live.... b/c you value life. And you never answered my question about your daughter/g'daughter, if you have any. If you do, you're doing something horrible to them by destroying their self worth - leading them to believe that you think a perverts/criminals lives is just as valuable as theirs & other women and they will believe it too....and that's the really sad part.....

I suppose you think John Couey, a Florida repeat offender pedophile who waltzed out of the revolving doors of the penitentiary AGAIN and that time he kidnapped an 8 yr old girl out of her bed in the middle of the night, stuffed her in his closet, raped her for several days, then buried her ALIVE....... and you think his life is of 'value' - why? Because he happens to have a pulse? That's the only thing the depraved pig had .... no heart, no soul, no conscience, no NOTHING. From that crime, we got "Jessica's Law"......

We all know about domestic abuse and incest and yes, I heard about the woman jailed for firing a warning shot at her abusive husband. Another example of the demented lawmakers, coming up w/another unjust law. Hopefully, she'll be out very soon.....

Well. Nothing more to say, except I feel sorry for you if you think a pervert's/criminal's life is just as valuable as yours and the females in your family.......all females - all good, law-abiding people..... my gawd.

 

Well, there's the answer as to why you're .... who you are.

And a priest on top of it........

 

Like Zimmerman?

 

I suggest you get your facts straight. The man was outside the home, she was at the door. She closed the door, he did not try to enter, and she went a got her gun and then shot at him and their child hitting him. You can only use deadly force if you face imminent serious bodily harm or death, you can't use it as a "warning".

- - - Updated - - -

Threatened with what?

 

You offer no proof to backup your claims. THe verdict proves you are wrong.

 

I didn't follow the trial to much - just listened to the news - but made it a point to watch the "Star" witness......

I was surprised and at first tho't she was mentally challenged... seriously.

 

Thank you for your reply,

Ahhh...now you're a fan of 'proofs'? I'm assuming that you will commiserate!
You changed the claim. The claim was that Martin had engaged in criminal behavior. You altered that to "doesn't make him a drug addict". It isn't required to be a drug addict in order to engage in criminal behavior.
As to proving my claims. First you have agreed that Martin consumed pot, which means that he broke the law in consuming it. He thus also had to possess it. And it can be assumed that he bought it also, unless of course you believe that people supplied it to him for free. Lets not forget that he had a pipe to smoke it with. This is unlikely given Martins own words on social media. Martin had admitted to beating up other students in posts to his GF.

I am not required to prove his guilt concerning the jewelry. But I am required to cite the sources that form the accusation. Martin factually possessed 12 pieces of womens jewely and a watch and a screw driver. Martin would not say who the jewelry belonged to. Rather, he let the police take it(how generous), and to this day its still sitting on the shelf at the police station. Thus, what you would have us to believe is that a friend of Martin let him tote around a pocket full of their jewelry for no particular reason. And when the police asked Martin about it he chose to let them take it in lieu of just calling up the rightful owner. And that rightful owner has never even bothered to ask for the jewelry back even though the media has spoke about it for a year now!

Whoa now! Arent you supposed to cite sources and prove your claims? Here is what you just said;

"You still haven't provided any proof of any of your accusations."

Now Sadanie, you arent being duplicitous here are you?

 

Proof ?

- - - Updated - - -

Proof ?

 

It is just like trayvonites to beg for proof but offer none themselves......derp!

 

The proof is in the jailhouse phone calls.

 

Wrong. the proof is in the jury verdict: not guilty.

 

You mean to tell me the undisputed debate champion two years going...is saying that a not guilty verdict means you're innocent?

 

In the jailhouse phone calls George instructed Shellie how to hide the money.

 

In the eyes of the Law yes, in the eyes of reality a not guilty verdict means nothing. People use different definitions.

 

Do you not believe in the American way of innocent till proven guilty ? That might explain your confusion....