Wrong their report was much more than some GIFs But in fact we are discussing you not them. You claim they are fraudulent and cannot offer evidence. You were asked to produce mathematial evidence and cannot do so. Yes they did provide math you did not. Rather than pait and swithc trying to discuss them offer evidence of your own claims
which claim are you talking about? another one of your imaginary strawmen? I keep asking you to cite something and you cite nothing, just keep ranting without a cause.
I did cite your childish claims and none of them were strawmen. Whenever you are cornered and proven to be incapable of providing evidence you take several steps back and evade the question. Where is your evidence?
you have not cited any claim from me period! I cant supply evidence for some imaginary strawman you cooked up. STOP this back and forth
lol You claimed that a GIF constitutes a mathematical explanation for how the towers fell. That is not a strawman argument it is fact. You claimed that people stated that the towers were made of glass. Not a strawman argument but a fact and an outright lie You claimed that the NIST report is fraudulent but failed to offer any evidence. Not a strawman argument but fact. Yes you stop the back and forth and start answering for your dishonest statements
They are not strawmen asked and answered they are facts you evade. You cannot provide and have failed to provide a mathematical explanation for how the buildings should have fallen. You cannot provide evidence that sombody claimed the buildings were made of glass. You cannot provide evidence that the NIST report was faudulent. Now you know you have asserted all of these things but you cannot back them up with evidence. Those are facts not straw man arguments and you still will not provide evidence. The burden of proof as the accuser is on you not me
standing on your soap box screaming baseless rants proves nothing, but carry on if it makes you feel better.
jojo wasnt "caught" at anything. if you think jojo was caught at something, by all means use the quote function and quote it and we can discuss it. Repeating the the famous last words of defiance whiile the OSHuggers titanic disappears below the surface.
One tactic these pro-official version posters use is to bury the evidence being discussed to reduce the number of viewers who see it. That's what I think they're doing now. It would be a good idea to post this link at least once per page to thwart them. David Chandler 2010 "9/11 Analysis" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6JN9cwY_OE (7:05 time mark)
This thread is about videos so I don't think this post is off-topic. There are a lot of links to 9/11 truther videos here. http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_wa...es-tribunal-with-alfred-lambremont-webre.html Here are two of them. International Conference on "9/11 Revisited -- Seeking the Truth" (19.11.2012) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHBSG7Mf8T8 Michel Chossudovsky´s Presentation to the 9/11 Revisited conference in Malaysia https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6tY_Z-LvXbc
That is a really worthwhile video, Scott. Thanks. Starting at 20:00 David Chandler asks NIST Shyam Sunder a question and he stutters and hem haws it is really fun to watch.
You're welcome. I'm finding a lot of good stuff in that link in my last post. Check this out. http://exopolitics.blogs.com/911_wa...d-how-to-proceed-graeme-macqueen-on-grtv.html http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z0Lsyox2zg#t=290
Actually your claim is false. No one buries any evidence because you twoofers never provide any evidence in the first place. Take this video you linked to for example. It shows no evidence whatsoever of fraud or refuting the NIST report. - - - Updated - - - Yes you were caught you made assertions you cannot support or back up.
yeh the phd's are finally catching up with the truthers! - - - Updated - - - yeh agreed it was enjoyable watching him sweat
Obviously your quote button has failed again. might want to contact tech support and have them fix it for you because people will think you are being extremely dishonest
Really? Like you discussed when I caught you saying you said something completely different, when in fact there was a QUOTE of what you actually said? Remember that Koko? I asked you to show me examples of thermite/thermate causing steel to erode to paper thin. I asked you to show where examples of the following characteristics were ever witnessed when thermite/thermate was used. And what did you say? Then, after having your butt handed to you, you tried to cover it up by saying you never said the above. You tried to convince everyone that you never said anything but the fact that thermtic material caused the heat only. I called you out on it multiple times, but you never responded. Why?
Sorry BJ. He tried to change what he said previously because he got his butt handed to him. It's all there in black and white. Have fun with it. At least people reading this thread see what he (and you) are all about.
Sorry. but you're wrong. It's been caught with quotes. Keep supporting Koko's misleading posts. It fits you well.
