The republicans war on women continues

You are generalizing.

That is why I referred to you as a right-winger.

Like I said, I don't know women who are out there getting pregnant and having abortions for the thrill of it. That is not a valid reason to deny a woman the right to choose what to do with her body, period.

 

What do we do... 'euthanize' them?

 

So you are generalizing people associated to the right and the same time you are telling me that I am generalizing women. Interesting.

They have the right to choose as long as they are paying for it. As I said men and women alike would tell you that sex doesn't feel the same with condom and most women don't want to risk their physic with pills.

- - - Updated - - -

No, I believe their families and the addict should pay for their own mistake. By the way what are the chances of an addict being rehabilitated?

 

Well, that will work in some cases... but no, families will likely not be there for all of the people who need help.

As nasty as it may sound, we either help them or put them out of their misery. Personally, I'm for helping them.

http://www.examiner.com/article/drug-policy-contrast-between-the-united-states-and-the-netherlands

 

It is to prove a point of your own medicine. You are GENERALIZING.

Yea bull. Health care is paid for in this country by everyone whether you accept the truth or not. These "pay for this" arguments are just pure nonsense. Just a way to divide this country further. Cut the moral superiority crap.

When you slip and break your leg, you should pay for your own mistake. Perhaps you don't understand the point of INSURANCE.

 

When you slip and fall it is an ACCIDENT. When you try drugs it is a CHOICE. There is the difference. There are things that you can't control in life. Those things should be covered by insurance.

 

The more answerable question is, what liberal policy isn't kooky and rooted in reality? ...and by reality I'm talking about real to the vast majority of people-- not just what liberals have made up for themselves. What isn't kooky about OWEbamaCare? What isn't kooky about EPA policies? What isn't kooky any gun control policy?

I have some more "reality" for you..... our Constitution and laws came from Judea-Christian religious beliefs.

 

Only in the liberals "reality".

 

Apparently it is YOU who seeks the weeds with avoiding her answer with such an inane response.

 

No, but we have men in the GOP that think it is reality.

[video=youtube;1KdMyaz-IDA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KdMyaz-IDA[/video]

 

Thank You!

They make it sound like the Republicans won't get women's votes.

It didn't hurt Obama a bit to pay women on his staff less before the 2012 election.

 

I'm not in your GOP, but one person does not define a group. If that were so, then Bill Clinton alone has waged more of a war on women than this guy has.

 

You don't have a very good understanding of religion do you.

- - - Updated - - -

And Hillary let's not forget.

 

Ahh so women don't engage in sex for the thrill of it, then what do they engage in it for?

 

Just checked my comprehensive prescription drug coverage and Rogaine is not covered, men have to buy it for themselves at $59.95.

- - - Updated - - -

Because another life is involved.

 

Clearly, Hillary is not the "feminist" icon that the left makes her out to be. A real feminist would not have tolerated Bill's rape, adultery, and sexual harassment of women, nor would a feminist compromise on those principles to ride on a mans coat tails for power and fame. She lied, she is a "stand by your man" Tammy Wynette.

 

Got something to back up that statement of fact?

 

You left out "help conceal his sexually preditory acts and help to attack and or threaten the women who did come forward or were threats to come forward and denigrated the women he did have sexual affairs with and then said his behavior was excusable".

She was a general in the war against women she and her husband waged.

 

Agreed, Hillary's role and the Clinton tactics of their "scorched earth" policy of personal destruction against their detractors are well known.

 

"during a legitimate rape, the woman's body shuts down"

"pregnancy from rape may be God's plan"


Does anybody think Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock are ALONE in the Republican Party holding these views???

 

Only if one is to think that Bill Clinton is the only rapist, adulterer and sexual harasser in the Democrat Party.

Does anyone think that what Todd Akin and Richard Murdock think qualifies more as a war on women than what Bill Clinton actually did?

We can play this game all day. Fact of the matter is that it is stupid to say that one party is waging a "War On Women".

 

How has Bill Clinton waged war on women?!?!

Ohh, you heard it from Rand Paul. Do you know how to think for yourself?

 

1) Pregnancy is statistically rare.
2) Sex is meant to feel good.
3) Our bodies are made to reproduce as early as teenage years
4) No one "intends" to get pregnant to have an abortion.

 

I take that was rhetorical....

 

I figured a well constructed response would be too much.