So LGBT is a personal life style choice — so what?

You havent yet quoted any of the ruling that contradicts any of the quotes I have provided from the ruling. As usual, you have the thoughts bouncing around in that head of yours to support your assertions regarding the ruling while I have quotes from the ruling to support my assertions.

 

Dude the ruling was Obergefell. This other case is NOT the basis of that ruling but one small precedent that was taken into consideration. SCOTUS makes the call and did not even mention your claim in the majority or minority positions.

 

I quoted from Obergefell Einstein.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf

 

sorry, but you yourself posted the dicta, not the ruling. I don't need to post anything. Just point out that you keep quoting/posting the dicta.

please stop lying about what the court ruled. It's tiresome and pathetic.

 

Still, nothing other than the thoughts bouncing around in your own mind. The usual for you. AND QUOTES aren't lies, they are quotes.

 

They are meaningless quotes. Not even sure what your point is?

 

sorry, but you yourself posted the dicta, not the ruling. I don't need to post anything. Just point out that you keep quoting/posting the dicta.

please stop lying about what the court ruled. It's tiresome and pathetic.

 

Your labeling the quotes from the Supreme Court case "dicta" is meaningless. Just more random thoughts bouncing around in that head of yours. AND AGAIN, quotes aren't lies. They are quotes.

"The imposition of this disability on gays and lesbians serves to disrespect and subordinate them. And the Equal Protection Clause, like the Due Process Clause, prohibits this unjustified infringement of the fundamental right to marry"

 

Ok....so what? That statement is TRUE.

 

The point is to DEMONSTRATE how wrong you and Rahl are.

 

Wrong in what? What are you trying to achieve? What point are you trying to make?

 

sorry, but you yourself posted the dicta, not the ruling. I don't need to post anything. Just point out that you keep quoting/posting the dicta.

please stop lying about what the court ruled. It's tiresome and pathetic.

- - - Updated - - -

Lol, but you've been shown it's dicta and not the ruling. You've been called on this lie dozens of times by dozens of posters.

 

Sorry, but what you label "dicta" from the case, has more evidentiary value than the random thoughts bouncing around in your head.

Quotes aren't lies.

You haven't "shown" anything. And your "calls" based upon the random thoughts bouncing around in that head of yours are meaningless other than to demonstrate you cant even formulate an argument.

 

That you are full of (*)(*)(*)(*), when you post-

 

sorry, but you yourself posted the dicta, not the ruling. I don't need to post anything. Just point out that you keep quoting/posting the dicta.

please stop lying about what the court ruled. It's tiresome and pathetic.

 

No sure of your point. You've not posted either dicta or ruling to contradict a thing I have stated or the quotes posted.

Quotes are not lies. They are the reality you cant deal with.

 

Are you claiming your little quote was mentioned in the majority or minority opinions of Obergefell? Who actually made that quote?

 

sorry, but you yourself posted the dicta, not the ruling. I don't need to post anything. Just point out that you keep quoting/posting the dicta.

please stop lying about what the court ruled. It's tiresome and pathetic.

 

You do if you want to support the BS you spew here because ANY quotes from the Supreme court decision trumps the silly ideas bouncing around in your head, when the topic of discussion is the Supreme Court decision. Ive supplied quotes from the decision that directly support my assertion and refute yours. You have offered nothing.

 

The majority, written by Kennedy.

 

Ok lets concede its there. Ok...so what? Did you just want to win some minor point?

 

sorry, but you yourself posted the dicta, not the ruling. I don't need to post anything. Just point out that you keep quoting/posting the dicta.

please stop lying about what the court ruled. It's tiresome and pathetic.

 

Quotes aren't lies. Reality you cant deal with.

 

Well, if this week long debate with you is such a minor point, why have you been denying it for a week?

 

I still have no idea what your point even is? LOL We settled LONG AGO that compelling interest is ALWAYS required in a case where there is discrimimnation of rights claimed.