When the author is a well known right wing partisan who has proven time and again to get it wrong or breathlessly overplay something that never pans out -- and is a far flung Trump cultist, that itself is a poison well. And it takes some nads to complain about something your Dearest Leader does day in and day out as easy as he breaths - attacking the source, many legitimate sources that don't have a fail rate even coming close to John Solomon. It wasn't that long ago John Solomon was on Hannity, Trump's main man sack licker, saying he had proof Assange could exonerate the Russian involvement in the DNC hacks. Yeah, that never materialized. Solomon is pretty much on Trump's payroll. And before him on his knees.
I wrote this back in June: There's another by-line by the former Moonie Times guy and Trump pumper John Solomon. I just saw they hired him - so expect the quality of The Hill reporting to be diminished appreciably. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Solomon "After leaving The Washington Times, Solomon became chief creative officer for Circa News. Circa is a mobile news application founded in 2011 that streams updates on big news events to users. In June 2015 it shut down, but its relaunch was announced after its acquisition by Sinclair Broadcast Group.[1] As chief of Circa he has written and published a number of political articles, often defending the Trump administration and Michael Flynn." http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ail-controversy.509655/page-5#post-1067739987
"Circa is owned by Sinclair Broadcast Group, which is known for its conservative bias and connections to Trump associates. During the 2016 campaign, Sinclair made a deal with Trump’s team to push stories favorable to the future president. It shouldn’t come as a surprise that Carter and Solomon have used Hannity’s platform to do just that."
And the FBI has confirmed that Mule-face's bff Comey is a lying colluding scum bucket that obstructed justice by writing Hillary's exoneration months before he announced it.
Here's one they might like ... "Panama Papers". The journalist was car bombed in Malta ... ThIs is some back story. http://nypost.com/2016/01/17/after-pardoning-criminal-marc-rich-clintons-made-millions-off-friends/ It has Russians, money laundereing, tax evasion, and bribery. Cyprus Bank was a big topic a few weeks back. Add political assassination of the whistleblower ... good stuff.
so your claiming anything with a conservative bias is not credible just fake news? so does that same sentiment hold true with any news agency with a liberal bias? CNN, MSNBC, the NY Times, Washington Post, Politico? see all those liberal news agencies use anonymous sources with no verification no other evidence then report it as fact This has documentation to go with the source
To repeat: When the author is a well known right wing partisan who has proven time and again to get it wrong or breathlessly overplay something that never pans out -- and is a far flung Trump cultist, that itself is a poison well. And it takes some nads to complain about something your Dearest Leader does day in and day out as easy as he breaths - attacking the source, many legitimate sources that don't have a fail rate even coming close to John Solomon. It wasn't that long ago John Solomon was on Hannity, Trump's main man sack licker, saying he had proof Assange could exonerate the Russian involvement in the DNC hacks. Yeah, that never materialized. Solomon is pretty much on Trump's payroll. And before him on his knees. I wrote this back in June: There's another by-line by the former Moonie Times guy and Trump pumper John Solomon. I just saw they hired him - so expect the quality of The Hill reporting to be diminished appreciably. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Solomon "After leaving The Washington Times, Solomon became chief creative officer for Circa News. Circa is a mobile news application founded in 2011 that streams updates on big news events to users. In June 2015 it shut down, but its relaunch was announced after its acquisition by Sinclair Broadcast Group.[1] As chief of Circa he has written and published a number of political articles, often defending the Trump administration and Michael Flynn." http://www.politicalforum.com/index...ail-controversy.509655/page-5#post-1067739987
DEEP STATE SWAMP: Comey, Mueller, Rosenstein, Are Linked to Clinton Uranium One Deal – MOST CORRUPT OFFICIALS EVER!
Can you follow a train of thought? Seems you can't separate fact from opinion either. I specifically responded a question. " how does one disprove that which has yet to be proven"
Never listen to Sean Hannity but today he was hitting this story hard and claims that much more data, facts, information, etc. will be out by the end of the week. This story is not new and it was all well chronicled in the "Clinton Cash" book but the Obama regime was able to keep a lid on the story. Now the Trump FBI is looking at this story with fresh eyes and renewed interest. The raw facts, i.e. what Madame Clinton did, the money that poured into the Clinton Foundation from Russian oligarchs, the well paid speeches that Bill suddenly found giving speeches to Russian bankers and the like is not in doubt. If Sessions and the FBI stay on track we're looking at some real bad news for Clinton suckers.
How about Rosenstein appointing a Mueller like Inquisitor to get to the bottom of the real Russian scandal in Washington DC? That would be a refreshing change and it seems well apparent that Mueller may pick off an underling or two (or may not) but he has nothing on the big prize, Trump.
Rosenstein & Mueller headed the Uranium 1 bribery investigation ... Comey & McCabe were on board too. All the serious charges were dropped, immunity deals, and plea bargains for all but 1 Russian involved.
Yes. I remember Hannity ticking off their names. Once again we see that no one should ever see how sausages and high level government deals are made. It would sicken and disgust too many people. Sessions and Christopher Wray have their work cut out for them and the idea of Mueller and Comey sharing a jail cell is aiming high but the two are joined at the hip, apparently, so it would be appropriate if the the Uranium One investigation was found to be a con job by the same people that now want Trump's head on a pole.
Why don't you just deny that it's real and say Hillary and Bill are clean and pure as the driven snow and would never accept bribes from Russia. Why is it okay for the collective to collude with Russia?
The fact is at some point an inordinate amount of Russian money FLOWED into Clinton hands and nothing explains the sudden surge but Hillary and her deal with Rosatom for Uranium One.
I agree, lock them up. I'm sure Trump really wants to see this stuff go down but there are too many holdovers in the establishment that are blocking and hiding everything to do with the clintons and Russia. Comey etc...
Maybe, if he takes advice from Democrats thinking they have America's best interest in mind he is a total incompetent boob.
Cause I have no idea. Just like the benghazi investigations I'll wait for the official word before leaping to sentencing.