The DNC media will do their best to bury this story but theirs not a hole deep enough. This is a bomb shell and they would the able to ignore it forever. As we speak though they are looking for ways to spin it.
Yea. it was thoroughly investigated. Didn't you follow it at the time? Seems its was not quite what some would have the sheep believe.
Must of missed it, who was it? Let me guess... Nobody gave a stand down order, the troops are all liars.
You'll forgive me but you guys on the right have been crying "BOMBSHELL" for decades when it comes to the clintons and in almost every case it turn out to be a dun or at best a squib. Shall we wait for the lit fuse from the investigation before ducking for cover?
I purposely used the word "bombshell" because it's been the DNC media's favorite word now for almost a year as they desperately try to get rid of Trump.
How could it possibly be irrelevant when you yourself asked the question? Are you feeling irrelevant?,,,,,,,again.
In fact it hasn't been debunked, but is being confirmed. Great efforts have been made to discredit the information for quite some time, but evidence from the bribery trial confirms many allegations. The money Podesta received isn't disputed, nor payments Clinton received. Afidavits and testimony indicate many Russian actors were involved and were using various tactics, bribery & extortion, to secure the deal. The link reveals the FBI's informant was being extorted by the Russians involved. Practically everyone involved was either bribed or extorted to advance the Russian scheme. Read the link, and attached criminal court records. The FBI & DOJ kept a lid on this for years. Mueller, Comey, Rosenstein, and McCabe ran the whole sordid mess.
I will address the Clinton getting payments lie. Clinton did not get any payments. That is MUS ... made up sh....
So in other words Hillary Clinton, Obama, and Meuller just got nailed to the wall of corruption and so a supporter is determined to drag this thread off topic; ANY off topic direction will do. That says it all, really.
No. Hillary said,"I didn't do it!" and the Left-Allied MSM which pretty much openly works for the DNC said, "Well . . . that's good enough for us!" It's never actually been investigated by people interested in getting at the truth. That just might change. Perhaps the Left wasn't real smart in pushing the Russia story so very hard, since now they can't very well say, "Yes, but we meant that you should look rightward only; and not at us!"
Nothing made up about the principle suspects in the FBI's Uranium 1 bribery / extortion / racketeering investigation payments to the Clinton foundation. The Clinton foundations own disclosures reveal the amounts, and sources. Clinton maintains one has nothing to do with the other, but of course donations from those FBI suspects began, and ended simultaneously with the Uranium 1 deal.
Perhaps a shame Mueller wasn't as heavy handed then in seeking "leverage" as he is now. Maybe if Comey had a crisis of conscience then, and gone public, or at least informed the congressional committee ... Yes, threatening the players eventually given plea deals, or immunity, with long harsh prison sentences, might have led to that quid pro quo being exposed. We'll have to see what remains to be salvaged. Highlights the reason the FBI & DOJ need to clean house of incompetent, maybe complicit Obama appointees.
still waiting for the proof of the quid pro quo with Trump and Russia that you have already convicted him of
I never accused Trump of any direct collusion. Go find any post that you can proove that I did and post it. My trial attack has always been on Manafort who has worked for Russians. Manafort Aldo worked for the Scum Turd Pro-Russian Traitor Yanukovich the disgraced kicked out president of Ukraine. Manafiort became Trumps campaign chief and then the GOP platform plank of supporting weapons for Ukraine disappeared from the platform. Was there intended quid pro quo by Manafort Trump's campaign chief??
Hillary said they were broke when they left the WH ... pays to have friends though http://nypost.com/2016/01/17/after-pardoning-criminal-marc-rich-clintons-made-millions-off-friends/
two major problem with the farfetched conspiracy first to be so called quid pro quo you have to show what both parties received what did Manafort get? second Manafort was far gone from the Trump campaign long before the RNC platform was ever written Now here is the undisputed quid pro quo with Clinton and Russia Clinton signed off on a sale that gave Russia control of almost one forth of North American uranium deposits even after the FBI had evidence of kickback bribes and money laundering of the Russian nuclear industry and in return Clinton got over 100 million dollars donated to Clintons foundation and Bill Clinton got half a million dollars for one speech given to the Russian bank that greatly profited from the sale so you are trying to claim there was quid pro quo with Manafort which you have no evidence of Manafort receiving anything and you have no evidence that Manafort had any influence with the RNC platform then you will deny quid pro quo when there is undisputed facts that Russia received control of 20% of our uranium deposits and Clinton received over 100 million in donations and B. Clinton half million for one speech Your blatant sycophant partisanship has made your truly blind
The collective will deny and ignore this at all cost. The last thing they will do, is admit they were wrong about the Clinton's and hold them accountable for their actions. A while ago I predicted Chelsea will turn on the collective and become a conservative.