Immigration

Why do you insisting on telling half truths?? Follow it through and really see how many of those are conservatives and how many are "leftists" as you love to put it. All of a sudden you mention them by party, LMAO.

By the way, if you are going to cherry pick data, at least don't pick the image from the site that also disputed your own data you've posted.



It is you who failed in history class....MISERABLY.

 

No White bull **** to it. It comes out of the mouth of the Left constantly. Along with trying to make you feel guilty of being White.

 

1986: Amnesty

In the campaign for the 1986 amnesty law, Kennedy predicted that the law would grant citizenship to no more than 1.3 million people. “We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this,” he said.

But by 2007, the number of people in the country illegally had jumped to more than 12 million.

 

Immigration. Less is better. Least is best.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964

Don't confuse a Guardian opinion piece for history.

 

Then it should be easy for you to provide me with a direct quote where they say "our goal is to make whites a minority."

 

You were the one that posted the image from the same site I've posted. Are you saying that your own post was a lie?? If you think their data ain't fitting, why did you choose to post it in the first place?

By the way, since you are the one that gave me the link from Wikipedia, you should have READ the ENTIRE article. Here it is for you:

Note: "Southern", as used in this section, refers to members of Congress from the eleven states that made up the Confederate States of America in the American Civil War. "Northern" refers to members from the other 39 states, regardless of the geographic location of those states.[24]

The original House version:

• Southern Democrats: 7–87 (7–93%)
• Southern Republicans: 0–10 (0–100%)
• Northern Democrats: 145–9 (94–6%)
• Northern Republicans: 138–24 (85–15%)

The Senate version:

• Southern Democrats: 1–20 (5–95%) (only Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
• Southern Republicans: 0–1 (0–100%) (John Tower of Texas)
• Northern Democrats: 45–1 (98–2%) (only Robert Byrd of West Virginia voted against)
• Northern Republicans: 27–5 (84–16%)

It is the same information I've provided you. Are you still disputing that conservatives were the one's opposed the bill?? SMDH.

 

Soon to become a minority in the U.S., whites express ...
newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/soon-to-become-a-minority-in-the-u-s...
One group was told that whites will no longer be the majority in the U.S. by 2050; in fact, this is likely to be true as soon as 2043, according to some projections. The second group was told that whites would retain their majority status in the U.S. through at least 2050.

1. Soon to become a minority in the US, whites express ...
   phys.org › Other Sciences › Social Sciences
   ... whites express declining support for diversity, psychology ... that whites will soon be a minority ... say the results are related to whites ...
   
   
2. When will minorities be the majority? - The Boston …
   https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/02/26/when-will...
   By mid-century, it looks as if the United States may become a majority-minority nation, a place where whites make up less than half the population — while African-Americans, Asians, Hispanics, and other minority groups together account for slightly more.
   
   
3. Soon to become a minority in the US, whites express ...
   www.psypost.org/2014/10/soon-become-minority-us-whites-express...
   One group was told that whites will no longer be the majority in the U.S. by 2050; in fact, this is likely to be true as soon as 2043, according to some projections. The second group was told that whites would retain their majority status in the U.S. through at least 2050.
   

 

The great republican Reagan signed that bill into law. Neither pappy Bush or Jr. Bush did a damn thing to help the cause.

 

I see. You're saying Republicans are racist and Democrats will exploit their racism by encouraging immigration. Hohhhh-Kayyyy....

 

You are losing it man. Why are you using a study to claim that someone actually said what you were spouting and meant it??

 

What do you think made Reagan sign the bill?

“We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this,” he said.

 

Apparently, some on your side believe Republicans today are racist and won't stand a chance with immigrants.

 

Because over the last few months I have seen it over and over. Didn't think I'd have to copy it down to use later. But just where do you think they got that idea?

 

yeah, yeah, yeah...you think he was fooled by the Dem party into signing the bill. You have yet to say why papa Bush and Jr. Bush did nothing to stem the tide?? R or D....they are both sides of the same coin.

 

You mean illegal immigrants. I think Republicans believe they have just a good a chance as Democrats with regular immigrants that come in. It's illegals who want to jump ahead of everyone else and who the Democrats are holding the door open for them that we know we don't stand a chance for their vote.

 

Newsflash for you - Anybody can do ANY study for ANYTHING they want. It have zero bearing in real life unless somehow you are feeling the "white guilt" and actually believe in that asinine premise.

Just for giggle check out the gov. spending for this study:

5. Nearly $150,000 to understand why politics stress us out

https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/12/top-10-wasteful-government-expenses/

 

Bush sent about 6,000 National Guard that helped build a fence. Democrats made a promise to do two things and they did neither. You put troops or border patrol on the border, then after a few months need money for something else and cut them. A Wall is a one time thing and you don't have to pay health care or vacations.

 

No I think as long as the Left doesn't want to do anything about securing the border, we will see it happen.

 

I've had a lot of liberals agree with my entire list as long as we give DACAs a green card if they don't have a criminal record and come up with something, maybe not citizenship, for many if not most well-behaved illegals already here.

 

Nothing is required: whites are going to be the minority very soon, although no racial or ethnic minority will have larger numbers. Fortunately for the future of this country, younger people of all races are getting along much better these days.

 

The Left is more worried about getting more future voters to hold power than anything else.

Hispanics already have the second largest group in the country and every country south of the border are of pretty much of Spanish decent. We just replace one group with another.

 

No, I'm not saying that.

 

Then immigrate legally.

 

It still does. We have about one million that comes here legally every year and that seemed to work out fine. People came in from many countries from around the globe. But for some reason the Liberals still think this is a new country and is needing immigrants to fill it up. But this isn't 1850 or 1900. We have more people than we can take care of, yet we still bring in about one million a year. Why is that so hard for the Left to understand? Or could it be they look at these illegals as future Democratic voters?