Mueller complained that Barr’s letter did not capture ‘context’ of Trump probe

Even if you believe Mueller should have been appointed given the swirl of questions kicked up about Russia, Volume 2 of the Mueller report should not exist at all, once investigators determined there was no collusion and they were not issuing any charges. Most likely it was a compromise by Mueller with his aggressive prosecutors, including former Clinton counsel, to get agreement on the report and its strong language on the lack of collusion. It was a bone for the Democrats that was unfortunate, as it would have been much better for the country had they simply said that a bewildered president contemplated some strong actions but, in fact, did nothing to impede the investigation.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/...f-the-mueller-report-should-not-exist-at-all/

 

Until he is, the evidence is the reality....he hasn't been called. Why won't the Dems in the House call him?

 

Watch this space.

 

Contrary to your false claim, obstruction of justice does not require an underlying crime.

But that’s what you get when the Trumpischer Boerbachter does your thinking for you.

Furthermore, Trump was not a “bewildered President”, He knew exactly what he was doing, and he instructed people to lie for him. His intent is very clear.

And he has been behaving this way all his life. To suggest that obstruction was just the actions of a bewildered clown in way over his head, is dishonest to say the least.

The facts clearly refute that fake notion.

 

Well they didn't have collusion on day one, week one, month one, why after 22 months of nothing about collusion? Should have taken 5 minutes and the investigation over! Someone should ask him. Was it a political #WitchHunt?

Trust me, someone will ask. And they'll ask if you knew this was all based on info from Crooked Hillary and the Russians, why investigate at all? Why not investigate Crooked Hillary for collusion?

 

Congress has never moved to impeach on a President without a recommendation of criminal prosecution. That's what is lacking here....the House can certainly try, but even Nancy P realizes that's political sucide.

 

Because the Obama administration and the FBI already knew before Trump.

 

This is certainly true, but as the DOJ stated, it certainly goes to the corrupt intent element. Hard to show, without one

 

Again, you can take the QUOTE from Muellers letter or the misinterpretation of what the Mueller letter says from a DOJ talking head.

I'll go with the QUOTE myself, but you swallow what you need to swallow...

 

Yep 22 months for something he knew after 4-6 months. That question will come up in testimony. It makes dems all look really bad for carrying on a witch hunt they knew was a hoax.

 

Hey, the guy has lost a LOT of weight over the years... You gotta give him credit for having the surgery. He's now a STOUT pig hack....

 

Mueller wrote complaining that Barr’s four-page letter to Congress describing the conclusions of the investigation “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of the investigation, yet Mueller said the four-page letter was not inaccurate.

Sounds like an argument over a grade for a high school book report.

 

Obstruction of Justice and 12 investigations still on going is not a witch hunt.

 

He will be. Your eagerness is commendable, but you will have to wait.

 

When is he scheduled?

 

LMAO at "bewildered president"... that's a new one.... How can the Glorious Leader be anything but .... wildered (I guess)???''

I'm pretty sure Trump would rather be impeached than called bewildered... That poster is now in big trouble in MAGA-land...

 

Thank you for overturning PI's arguments. I don't think she will authorize impeachment hearings now, because although she would get an indictment, a Senate trial would not convict and order removal. Mueller will testify at the opportune political moment for the Dems.

 

No JS ... you are spinning ... you are parroting alt left fallacies. The congressional House or reps can issue a judicial disposition for high crimes and misdemeanors independent of the judicial branch /DOJ. Adam Schiff vowed that a blue wave mid-term, coupled with Schiff's "ample & direct evidence" would result in impeachment. Now your propaganda is that if voters hand the oval office to the party of liars who control the House, (D)'s will get revenge in 2021. (D)'s lies on top of lies JS.

 

Great... I hope so, since they cannot put a time limit on the Mueller answer... an open ended question like that will allow him to recap the entire report, should he so choose... that'll go over well...

 

Yes she understands it would be unprecedented to do and kill the left’s political hopes

 

No PI, you are dodging and weaving, and quacking all of the extremist rwnj talking points.

"judicial disposition for high crimes and misdemeanours" is legislative action to remove a member of the executive branch

 

"WITCH HUNT! WITCH HUNT! WITCH HUNT! WITCH HUNT!
WITCH HUNT! WITCH HUNT! WITCH HUNT! WITCH HUNT!
WITCH HUNT! WITCH HUNT! WITCH HUNT! WITCH HUNT!..."​

The stark contrast between Barr's sugar-coated supercollider-spin of Mueller's report vs Mueller's report was underscored by Deranged Don's own ecstasy over Barr's spin vs his narcissistic hysteria over Mueller's report.

Initially,

"TOTAL EXONERATION!"

Soon followed by

"IT'S BULLSH*T!"​

"Trump defend the US against hostile foreign
attacks upon its democratic process?
Don't make me laugh!
For Trump, it's all about Trump!"​

 

Well impeachment isn't just limited to the Executive, it's been used mainly for removal of members of the Judicial branch.

 

They haven't confirmed, but Nadler's letter to Mueller requested 5/23.... or ASAP...

 

Gotcha....I wonder why they'd ask Barr to testify before Mueller? Seems like Mueller would be the key here.