Kinzinger Introduces Use of Force Resolution against Russia

I admire nothing about him. He is a retard and a cry baby. And a war monger.

 

Probably because this conversation is SUPPOSED to be about Adam Kinzinger and a bill introduced in Congress about Ukraine.
And talk about "big talking"! You're doing a lot of "ass kicking" today! And it's still early! Might want to pace yourself! lol

 

During those two wars the soviet leadership went from being sure in victory (stage 1), to accepting the fact that things are not working out (stage 2), to giving up and withdrawing (stage 3).
Russia is inching to the end of the first stage. I think keeping the pressure on will help them to move to stage 2 and then stage 3. Russia is much weaker than USSR, they’ll be at the end of stage 3 sooner than many realize. Pootins regime is a big lie - everything is a lie in Russia now, but you can’t lie your way into building new and better weapons without some western components and they can’t lie themselves into building new alternatives. It took USSR a couple of decades to build up their economy as an independent entity, and that effort required strong regimentation of society and a lot of brutality - russia has none of that now. If we allow Pootin to walk away from this conflict and continue to run russia then he can try to attempt what Stalin did, but I don’t think he’ll live long enough to complete such transformation.

 

You must be so pissed that Donald Trump was nominated in 2016, as his party's top cry-baby and buffoon over 12 other potential nominees.

 

That was mean! Meanie!

 

The Ukrainians can win if they have long range weapons systems capable of taking out Russian artillery, and cutting off supply lines.

Trump was not the first to give effective weapons to Ukraine:

“In response to a request from Ukraine, and as part of our ongoing efforts to bolster Ukraine’s defense and internal security operations, today the United States delivered two AN/TPQ-36 radar systems to Ukraine at a ceremony in Lviv. Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko had the opportunity to review the equipment, and was briefed by U.S. military personnel on its capabilities. The radar systems delivered today will help defend Ukrainian military personnel and civilians against rocket and artillery attacks, which have historically been the most lethal threat to Ukrainian personnel and civilians.

The equipment was delivered on a rapid timeline – less than two months after President Obama delegated to the Secretary of State the authority to draw down up to $20 million in defense articles and services and up to $1.5 million in non-lethal commodities and services to provide these systems to Ukraine.

The provision of these systems brings our total security assistance committed to Ukraine in response to the crisis to more than $265 million since 2014.”
Fact Sheet on U.S. Security Assistance for Ukraine, United States Delivers Two Q-36 Counter Battery Radar Systems to Ukraine, By U.S. Embassy Kyiv | 14 November, 2015 .
https://ua.usembassy.gov/united-states-delivers-two-q-36-counter-battery-radar-systems-ukraine/

Far more will be needed for Ukraine to achieve a decisive victory over Russia.
Russia gave North Vietnam thousands of howitzers.

 

Show us the video where Trump actually cried. Fake like Schumer or Kingzinger or real.

 

Please somebody provide me a link of when Ukraine became part of these United States. I missed it.

 

I hope you're kidding!
I'm not trying to be mean!
I save mean for real life. It's too easy to be "tough" on the internet! lol

 

You don’t agree with the resolution.
We got it.

 

With all due respect, you simply do NOT know what you are talking about. 1500 nukes is the literal end of the world. AND 1500 is still far, FAR less than would actually be deployed

https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2022/02/...ear-bombs-would-it-take-to-destroy-the-world/

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/cp/nuclear-warheads-by-country-1945-2022/#:~:text=Nuclear Warheads Currently in Possession by Countries&text=As of 2022, about 12,700,, aircraft, ships and submarines.

 

Pretty much every video there is of him. He was constantly whining, bitching, moaning, shouting, screaming, blubbering and crying with actual tears about anything and everything, including how perfect his extortion attempt against Zelenskyy was.

 

Show us the results of an IQ test to prove that Kinzinger is actually developmentally delayed or has a lower IQ than normal?

See, I can be as literal in my interpretation of your language as you can be of mine!

 

I posted this link in another thread, but here:

As Russia-Ukraine Tensions Rise, U.S. 'Stress Tests' New Nuclear War Plan

https://www.newsweek.com/russia-ukr...ress-tests-new-nuclear-war-plan-1674324?amp=1

This is a strong indication that our government and military plan not just the survival in the nuclear war - its planning to win it, retain our fighting capability, and move on.
Think about it.

Added:
MAD is a myth. Our government allows everyone to think that MAD is real because such belief prevents Russia from building up more nukes and to assume we have no game plan. But the fact that such exercises are being conducted is a strong indication that we can take on Russia and destroy it. Actions speak louder than words - if Russia has enough nukes to destroy the U.S., why are we spending resources on such planning?

 

Some conservatives have a LOT more balls than brains

We got that too.

 

Link doesn't work for me.
But just to be clear, they intend for America to survive.
And it would. But I would estimate 70-90% of Americans would perish within one year of a major nuclear incident.
That nuclear winter would be a mother!

 

It's planning to destroy all life on Earth for the next several billion years.

Think about that.

 

Sorry about the link, forgot to add it.
Here:
https://www.newsweek.com/russia-ukr...ress-tests-new-nuclear-war-plan-1674324?amp=1

 

It's the globalists who want war with Russia because Russia won't play along. Democrats are a fully owned subsidiary of the globalists.

 

No, I think majority would survive.
Out of the 1,500 nukes Russia has, it’s a safe bet to make that about 1/3 will fail. 90% of their ICBMs use liquid propellant, which means they’d need to fuel them right before launch, and fueling must be done in open air (rocket fuel is very, very flammable) and it takes at least a half an hour to do that. We will know way in advance about their decision to nuke us and we will have time to hit them first - minuteman can be ready to go within 10 minutes and we have a lot of nukes on our subs. Russians have subs too, but they don’t have the network of hydro acoustic sensors in the world ocean like we do. In the event of such conflict, a lot of these small but critical details will not favor Russia. I seriously doubt that even half of those 1,500 nukes would be able to reach the destination.

 

A nuclear war would be a catastrophe for the whole world, but it would not be the end of the world.

Chernobyl is a tourist attraction.



Ditto ground zero in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

 

Actions speak louder than words.

 

Nuclear war wouldn’t be a cakewalk, a lot of people would die. But it would not destroy the U.S. or NATO. It sure as hell would destroy Russia though.

 

Here's a man who thought about it:

 

And someone once noted that the survivors will envy the dead.