AMERICAN MOON (2017): A fascinating documentary about the Moan Hoax from start to finish

Oh yeah, you're also a big fan of Trump's second-favorite foreign dictator, aren't you? Thanks for the reminder.

 

Hmmmm..... does Putin also "believe" we went to the Moon in 1969-72 too?

 

I don't care what the KGB agent turned dictator claims to believe. Do you?

 

I care about what every world leader "Puppets" think.

Including the crooked and senile one named Joe Biden.

 

Joe thinks he has accomplished some great things so far, and he is correct.

 

Yes, running the country into the ground is such an accomplishment and that the FOOL actually has the balls to state that United States is not in a recession because of his raiding the U.S. Treasury for his grifting pals here in the USA and in the EU.

 

Since you are so ignorant, watch the video footage where we see him crouching down slightly to take the shot. Oh let me guess, the idiotic "it's too perfect" crap!

Shot before:

 

Troll noise. My expertise lies in actually knowing how the missions worked. As opposed to your ignorance on every single thing.

Moronic. It's a fixed lens. The figures quoted are made by Hasselblad and Zeiss.

Irrelevant gibberish. It's a fixed lens troll, there is no magnification!

It's like you read that somewhere and think it makes you look like an expert. It makes you look like a troll. Never has the depth of field altered the field of view on any camera. The depth of field is changed by altering the damn aperture! I expect you need to rush off and google what an aperture is.

Idiotic. The field of view determines the size of the image. When you view the image you know that it occupies 50 degrees as per the official statistics. The Earth occupies 2 degrees. Brainless people fail to work out how these tie in to each other.

Idiotoc troll noise. The image shows the correct Earth size.

 

,

Dude, you are as dense as they come. You should google a couple of guys. Dunning and Kruger because they got you straight.

 

You do realize the camera had no viewfinder... and yes, it's too perfect! and the astronaut had to get down on his knees - not a good idea on the broken glass surface of the moon.

 

Not to mention that those astro'nots (not professional photographers) some how managed to take such quintessential studio quality photographs that Ansel Adams could only dream of with the Moons landscapes and stunning unparalleled level of contrast and detail in every picture.

You can even see that the U.S. flag has water spots on it in a ZERO vacuum environment with miracle Kodak film that works in the same vacuum and hasn't exhibited one single sign of radiation damage (cosmic, gamma, or x-ray)

 

You are going to have to do better.

You just spout off your own loosely speculative assertions based on confirmation biases and supported with lunacies and fallacious logic that been debunked by actual FACT checkers, not imbeciles who can't buy a clue, and do no actual research except to parrot insane moon landing nonsense.

 

Noe. Let's get some perspective again. NASA, full of the finest minds on the planet chose the most absurd of all routes, the most ridiculous and harder route, which would involve a cast of thousands. This now involves faking all the photography. But according to the clueless who understand absolutely nothing related to anything within the scope of supposed fakery, they didn't get the size of the Earth correct.

• Now I have given you the specification sheet for the damn camera from the manufacturers.
• I have shown how this applies to EVERY image.
• I have taken the width of the Earth and roughly applied it across the image.
• It matches to what we would expect.

Meanwhile, you have supplied nothing but your ignorant troll noise and denial. It is ridiculously obvious that you have no idea about photography.

Troll noise. If ever somebody summarizes their own stupid behaviour, you just did it.

 

They practised - there are copious documentaries of them doing so in deserts etc.

Your useless opinion is irrelevant. Was the picture before too perfect?

He didn't get down on his knees! Their suits were toughened exteriors using things like teflon.

Do you ever, ever come up with anything accurate or useful? Don't you ever get tired of failing?

 

Troll noise, spam by numbers. The problem with people like you is you fail to back up your own claims. People go on vacation and show their pictures (in the old days!) and there were some really bad pictures. These ones don't get shown. Only the good ones! Go look at these, there are literally hundreds more like this.

A17_Mag133.jpg (850×10357) (nasa.gov)

Ludicrous. Explain why gamma and cosmic rays should penetrate the cartridge, the hull, the box they were placed in. Then explain why these same rays bombarding Earth every day of our lives didn't have the same effect on Earth film! I won't hold my breath, as usual you are just spewing spam by numbers that you blundered upon.

 

My GOD!

You are so inept that you actually posted the failed test pictures that were from the "trial & error" phases of trying to get their FAKED Moon landing stage set lighting correct...

And with even all that practice they still fu#$ed their staged moon landing photos up with shadows diverging in the wrong directions from all the multiple lighting devices being used on the set.

 

it was not faked and those pics among many other facts prove this.

The shadows fell as they should have on the moon.

That silly bullshit about diverging shadows has lond since debunked youngster.

 

Troll-noise. These were mainly taken from the lunar rover during traverses between stations. No clown on Earth can explain how this was faked:

 

Those have to be the worst examples of the FAKED moon landing that anyone would be stupid enough to cite. Marcus Allen and the expert staff from the "Apollo Detectives" debunked & destroyed those ludicrous nonsense claims with hard evidence and FACTS!

Got to admit though that I do enjoy you jumping through the NASA Apollo'gist hoops only to proven wrong over and over again by the Moon landing debunking EXPERTS.

 

Seriously?

 

Troll noise. Evasion.

As I said. No clown can explain it. You two just proved my point.

• Explain the dark sky.
• Explain evenly lit surface for kilometers of travel.
• Explain how every rock has a single shadow.
• Explain why distant mountains don't get closer.
• Explain why the terrain changes reflectivity as they turn cross sun.

After your embarrassing failure in the other thread, where your pathetic evasion was in action , I don't expect an honest or useful reply.

 

When you spend more than 6 years FAKING everything on a set within the studio with "trial and error" you will be bound to make a few things almost look "legit", but the moon landing debunking EXPERTS will tear it all a part and prove it was all a HOAX and deception, like the Apollo Detectives have already done.

But even those two videos are GOD awful products and clearly horrible frauds when you know what to look for.

 

There was no such trial and error.

You are making a circular argument. You are starting with a childish premise that the landings were faced and using that as a standard you judge all evidence to the contrary to be support for your failed premise.

Start with some evidence of your claim which is something you have never posted

 

Well, for starters, why don't you explain why the foreground (rover) is at a higher resolution than the background (moonscape).

 

Oh look Troll noise again. We have a massive daylight area with night sky and mountains. No clown explanation.