AMERICAN MOON (2017): A fascinating documentary about the Moan Hoax from start to finish

Discussion in 'Moon Landing' started by Navy Corpsman, Jul 25, 2022.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Navy Corpsman

    Navy Corpsman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Trophy Points:
    93
    UntilNextTime likes this.
  2. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Diablo and kiwimac like this.
  3. Navy Corpsman

    Navy Corpsman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Trophy Points:
    93
    The video documentary above proves well beyond any "scientific" doubt with well supported FACTS and logic that the moon landing was a complete sham and government HOAX.

    Now you are welcome to bring forward any FACTS presented in the documentary above that you disagree with and present your evidence that the participants are wrong about.
     
  4. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no it does not.

    It is a crockumentary not a dockumentary.

    It uses NO logic NO facts and No evidence. It is a massive failure and apathetic joke.

    Those are true facts and they prsented NOTHIGN new and NOTHIGN whioch has not been shredded cerushed ripped and ruined already in the other threads.

    There is NO evidence whatsoever of a hoax... NONE.

    Only liars who hate the US and people in general preach this claims of a hoax which is proven false beyond challenge
     
  5. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Lucifer, kiwimac and DEFinning like this.
  6. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,722
    Likes Received:
    11,268
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are other possible explanations. Like electrostatic forces for the reason dust may have been repelled from the landing pads, and the vacuum of space might have resulted in the exhaust expanding and cooling so fast there may have been no visible flame.

    Things do behave a little bit differently in a low gravity environment with no air.
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2022
  7. DEFinning

    DEFinning Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2020
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Wrong. It is you, who is making the allegation, that any educated, or intelligent, person, considers to be utter hogwash. It is therefore incumbent upon you, to make your case. I tried to watch the video, but got 3 1/2 minutes in, without hearing a single fact, to call the Apollo moon landing, into question. Your video seems to intend to explain its case, at a pace, set for idiots, and I do not have that kind of time to waste. There is nothing unbelievable, to my mind, about our having reached the moon. Were the Germans' V-2 rockets, that terrorized London, also a hoax? Well the man behind those rockets, Werner Von Braun, is the same man behind our rocket to the moon, and that was twenty five years later.

    BTW, it doesn't inspire a helluva lot of confidence in the scrupulous fact-checking, of your source when, in the title of his documentary site, he misspells "moon."
     
  8. UntilNextTime

    UntilNextTime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2022
    Messages:
    7,949
    Likes Received:
    3,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I dare say a citation would be required.
     
    Navy Corpsman likes this.
  9. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
  10. Disaffected

    Disaffected Newly Registered

    Joined:
    May 30, 2022
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Lucifer likes this.
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The film itself uses no facts or evidence yet you demand others use evidence.

    The film is a bunch of opinions with no logic or evidence behind gthemm and NOTHING MORE.

    The soviets monitored these missions carefully and of course they would have known if the landings were faked. They tracked the missions using radio tirangulation and radar. Which means they KNEW they were real. They would have been watching for any sign of a hoax. Had the missions been faked the Soviets would have jumped all over this WITH HARDCORE EVIDENCE to attack the US.

    What does your stupid video say??? Essentially: " unnh unnh the soviets would not have said anything because....................reasons":

    Your worthless video uses no intelligent or logical argument to explain why the soviets would have kept that secret during the cold war when they attacked the US with every form of propoganda possible whether true or false.

    It is well known that tens of thousands of people worked on the apollo missions and none of them have come forward to say it ws sa hoax. Your idiotic video claims they would have been compartmentalized and not known it was faked. They video presents NO ****ing evidence of this claim. The people working for NASA included some of the most brilliant people on the planet and yet some uneducated piece of **** who made a video thinks he is smarter than they are.

    NO sir you do not get to demand how one debunks this garbage video when the viddeo itself fails to live up to any standards of logic or credible evidence.

    The fact is only a complete lying sack of trash makes these claims. It is proven beyond ANYONES ability to refute that the landings were real.
     
    kiwimac likes this.
  12. Navy Corpsman

    Navy Corpsman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Trophy Points:
    93

    LOL that's been "DE-BUNKED" by not only the "FACT CHECKERS" but also by National Geographic magazine back in 1962.

    A ruby laser operated by Air Force Systems Command in the Sacramento Mountains near Cloudcroft, New Mexico, fired a laser onto the Moon and captured the laser light being reflected back to Earth.

    That was in 1962.

    And the Russians did the same laser experiment one year later as reported by the NY Times on November 4th, 1963.

    So who put the "reflectors" on the Moon way back in 1962 and 1963......:mrgreen:

    "Four years ago (1962), a ruby laser considerably smaller than those now available shot a series of pulses at the moon, 240,000 miles away. The beams illuminated a spot less than two miles in diameter and were reflected back to earth with enough strength to be measured by ultrasensitive electronic equipment. The beam of a high-quality searchlight, if it reached that far, would spread out to several times the moon's 2,160-mile diameter."


    [​IMG]



    National Geographic, December, 1966
     
  13. Navy Corpsman

    Navy Corpsman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Trophy Points:
    93
    The FACT CHECKERS & Moon HOAX De-Bunkers in the film absolutely use pure "FACTS" and "SCIENCE" to prove the Moon landing HOAX.

    Go to the 38 minute mark for PROOF!
     
  14. Navy Corpsman

    Navy Corpsman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Trophy Points:
    93

    Someone didn't watch the documentary where the FACT checkers debunk the whole Moon landing $cam.

    You are "DISMISSED"
     
    UntilNextTime likes this.
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong.

    yes one can do that without a retroreflector but not with any degree of accuracy

    http://www.famousdaily.com/history/laser-beam-first-bounced-off-moon.html

    Sorry but the presence of retroreflectors is proven and they are definitive proof you and your video which is full of complete BULLSHIT
    are both wrong.
     
  16. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They use no such thing. Your claim is a bald faced lie.

    They only spout uninformed opinions. without a SHRED of sciene or facgt as i have proven
     
  17. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No need as it is a ficti0onal chidlish video which you are posting lies about.

    They used no facts but just childishly stupid and worthless claims
     
  18. Navy Corpsman

    Navy Corpsman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Trophy Points:
    93
    You seem very upset!

    I get it, sometimes the "TRUTH" hurts!
     
  19. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have stated the trith proving your claims to be lies. Your video is worthless and empty of any facts or evidence.

    That is the truth. you know this as well as I do. You cannot make yourself look smart by embracing such idiotic beliefs.
     
  20. UntilNextTime

    UntilNextTime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2022
    Messages:
    7,949
    Likes Received:
    3,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The truth doesn't care about your feelings.
     
  21. UntilNextTime

    UntilNextTime Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2022
    Messages:
    7,949
    Likes Received:
    3,067
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That proves little, to nothing. Documentation that these reflectors exist
    would be best to substantiate your claim. Because even the myth busters can stage their test. How can it be proven
    that the observatory they're at, actually fired a beam at the said reflector? It's just like the moon landings, we're
    supposed to just take what is broadcast on tell-lie-vision as gospel? Pfft.
     
  22. Disaffected

    Disaffected Newly Registered

    Joined:
    May 30, 2022
    Messages:
    82
    Likes Received:
    103
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Well, any conspiracy theory can always defend itself by claiming that anyone who offers contradictory evidence is part of the conspiracy and the evidence is fake. You can play that game forever.

    As with all conspiracies, though, eventually you're pushed to the point where the conspiracy becomes so massive and total that it itself is harder to believe in than the thing it claims to debunk. I'd say we're long past that point with the moon landing. The primary task of moon landing deniers is no longer to point out flaws in the "official account" but to explain why on earth so many people, from so many nations, with such diverse and contradictory interests, would all remain united to perpetuating this absurd fallacy.
     
  23. Navy Corpsman

    Navy Corpsman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2014
    Messages:
    990
    Likes Received:
    1,034
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Well how about this known FACT:

    In 2007 Google launched an international competition called the "GOOGLE Lunar X-Prize" in which $40,000,000.00 would be awarded to any of the competitors to land a robotic probe on the moon and send live video back of the so called and NASA alleged Apollo moon landing sites.

    This would have been NASA's big chance to settle this "alleged" moon landing FARCE.

    But no!

    NASA told all 20 teams of international competitors that all the so called Apollo moon landing sites were strictly off-limits under the guise that they were historic and scientific artifacts solely belonging to the U.S. government and NASA only....:mrgreen:


    They then demanded that Astrorobotic steer clear of the so-called Apollo 11 lunar landing site where the U.S. flag that blows in the wind moves in the moons zero atmosphere vacuum. And they capitulated of course and will OBEY NASAs "MOON RULES"

    I wonder why NASA put in a 2 kilometer no-fly zone around their FAKED moon landing sites, no I don't....:mrgreen:

    NASA, in order to cover up all their FAKED moon landing lies had to come up with some new "Moon Rules" in order to prevent their MOON HOAX from being totally exposed and bursting a lot the brainwashed moon landing believers bubbles.....:)

    All the pictures below are taken from the FACT-CHECKERS video above and can be reference in the video starting around the 55 minute mark.


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
    Last edited: Jul 26, 2022
  24. DEFinning

    DEFinning Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2020
    Messages:
    15,971
    Likes Received:
    7,607
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    While nor does your answer attest to you having watched all of your video (or else you would presumably be able to summarize, key points), that's OK. I think I've already given this thread, more time than it is worth.

    Nano- nano.
     
  25. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,998
    Likes Received:
    3,612
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The fact that they can accurately measure a return from thoese reflectors IS absolute proof they are there.

    This is NOT something which can be faked
     

Share This Page