Jan 6 committee's 845 page report is now released

You can either purchase the book, kindle or in print, on Jan 3 2023, (a preorder will have Ari Melber's summary) or download the PDF now, at the following link.

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23515172/report_finalreport_jan6selectcommittee.pdf


In this report, full and conclusive proof has been provided for

Obstruction of an official proceeding Section 1512(c)(2) of Title 18
Conspiracy to defraud the government Section 371 of Title 18
Conspiracy to Make a False Statement Section 1001 of Title 18
Inciting aiding/abetting an insurrection 18 U.S.C. 2383

Details of what the committee alleges is in the report, but a factcheck.org summation
is here:

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/12/the-facts-underpinning-jan-6-committee-criminal-referrals/

Debates on any of the charges, fire away.....

 

A report of a "so called investigation" by democrats, written by democrats and written for democrats.

 

Let an American lawyer and former law professor known for his work in U.S. constitutional law and American criminal law tell you how the report has no legal standing... it violates the separation of powers...

Alan Dershowitz on Jan. 6 Committee's Trump criminal referral: This is unconstitutional

It violates 3 provisions of the constitution...

https://rumble.com/v21kvsw-alan-der...s-trump-criminal-referral-this-is-uncons.html

 

I think there were a couple RINO signatures on the report also. Just saying.

 

What is the standard for being a real Repub these days? Besides turning a blind eye to the voluminous evidence of Trump's orchestrated attack on our democracy.

 

My standard is anyone more devoted to their personal vendettas instead of working for who they were elected to represent has lost the right to be called a Republican. Those that just voted for the monstrosity of the Omnibus bill would fall short of my standard. Unsurprisingly two of them that voted with the Democrats also sit on the 1/6 kangaroo court.

 

Of which other than lies, distortions, and innuendo there is nothing. Oh I'm sure it'll give neocons and other leftist and administrative state acolytes more reasons to hate Trump not that they need any after all he render them little more than an academic study in futility. But then he couldn't have done it with out them and their all to obvious disdain for their own base.

 

So pretty much every Repub in the House.

 

Yea, if I had my way I'd toss everyone on both sides out after eight years.

 

No one is fabricating evidence. Evidence is all that matters. Evidence is neither democrat nor republican.

I mean, it's like your logic is 'only a republican can do a valid report.

Noting that there are republicans in the committee.

Vice Chair is a Republican.

1200 interviews of individuals who are mostly REPUBLICANS many TRUMP staff and entourage

Here are few that have recently been released, ALL REPUBLICANS

Cassidy Hutchinson
https://thehill.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/12/20220914_Cassidy-J.-Hutchinson-REDACTED.pdf

Christopher Barcenas
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220310_Christopher Barcenas.pdf

Kathy Berden
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220311_Kathy Berden (1).pdf

Alexander Bruesewitz
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220308_Alexander Bruesewitz.pdf

Patrick Casey
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220302_Patrick Casey.pdf

Dion Cini
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220519_Dion Cini.pdf

Jeffrey Clark Part 1, Part 2
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20211105_Jeffrey Clark.pdf
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220202_Jeffrey Clark.pdf


Jim DeGraffenreid
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220224_James DeGraffenreid.pdf

Enrique De La Torre
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220511_Enrique Alejandro de la Torre.pdf

John Eastman
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20211209_John Eastman.pdf

Jenna Ellis
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220308_Jenna Ellis.pdf


Kimberly Fletcher
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220114_Kimberly Fletcher.pdf

Michael Flynn
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220310_Michael Flynn.pdf

Nick Fuentes
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220216_Nicholas J. Fuentes.pdf

Julia Fancelli
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220218_Julia Fancelli.pdf

Bianca Gracia
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220407_Bianca Gracia.pdf

Alex Jones
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220124_Alex Jones.pdf

Ryan Kelley
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220421_Ryan Kelley.pdf

Charlie Kirk
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220524_Charlie Kirk.pdf

David Scott Kuntz
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220411_Scott Kuntz.pdf

Antonio LaMotta
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220526_Antonio P. LaMotta.pdf

Philip Luelsdorff
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220418_Philip Luelsdorff.pdf

Robert Patrick Lewis
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220415_Robert Patrick Lewis.pdf

Joshua Macias
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220502_Joshua Eric Macias.pdf

Shawna Martin
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220419_Shawna Martin.pdf

John Matze
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220525_John Matze.pdf


Michael McDonald
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220224_Michael J. McDonald.pdf


Elmer Stewart Rhodes
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220202_Elmer Stewart Rhodes III.pdf

Mayra Rodriguez
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220222_Mayra Rodriguez.pdf

Michael Roman
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220810_Mike Roman.pdf

Roger Stone
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20211217_Roger Stone.pdf

Enrique Tarrio
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220204_Henry Tarrio.pdf

James Phil Waldron
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220218_James P. Waldron.pdf

Kelli Ward
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220316_Kelli Ward.pdf

Garrett Ziegler
https://january6th.house.gov/sites/democrats.january6th.house.gov/files/20220719_Garrett M. Ziegler.pdf

 

But with no one arguing in Trump's favor.

 

And whose fault is that? McCarthy withdrew all of his committee appointees.

This is not a court of law, where there are advocates.

the objective is to find the truth. Truth has nothing to do with 'right or left'.

Trump refused to testify, as did a number of his surrogates.

The hard core Trumpers who did honor their subpoenas, ALL of them took the 5th. They have plenty of opportunity to defend Trump and they were only thinking of themselves.

But, that appears to be the norm in Trump world.

 

After McCarthy himself was kept from serving on the committee.

The committee was formed with the intention of finding Trump guilty for political purposes rather than find the truth. purposes.

Then don't pretend that this has anything to do with guilt or innocense.

 

Yea, its not like trump could testify on his own behalf. Oh wait.

 

That USED, almost exclusively, REPUBLICAN and tRaitor tRump White House staff as witness's.

 

Let's get something straight. The first protocol was to establish a committee in the Senate, and what happened? Repubs in the senate filibustered it.

Now then, Pelosi decides to go the 'special committee' route, which gives her the right to approve of all appointees. Which means all McCarthy had to do
was select three more, adding to the two she already approved. But, like a petulant child, he withdrew them all. My gut feeling is that he intentionally selected
Jordan knowing in advance that Pelosi would reject him, and he could then use that as an excuse to pull them all.

Blame Senate Repubs and McCarthy, but not the committee and/or Pelosi. That is, if you are interested in the fair and just, though that doesn't seem to be the case..

Final work product is all that matters, so if there is any untruthful testimony and emails and texts from the over 1100 persons interviewed the vast majority of whom are republicans, feel free to challenge them as well as any conclusions drawn from those testimonies and documents.

Blanket rejections will be summarily dismissed as lacking substance.

In the court of public opinion, we are so entitled.

 

Those called, that could have argued "in Trump's favor" ... took the 5th or didn't comply with subpoena's.

 

But he should not have been rejected. That already shows the democrats wanted to pack the committee in their favor

Being entitled does not make it fair or just.

 

Jordan spent his entire time in congress as a loud mouthed antagonist that would have disrupted an serious work by the committee. He was specifically chosen for that purpose.

Pelosi rejected him for good reason, McCarthy should have, could have chosen a moe reasonable replacement.

 

Jordan's a jackass who would do nothing but turn the investigation into a circus.
All he had to do was find 3 more serious repubs. It's not rocket science.

If you got a problem with that, then tell McConnell he shouldn't have filibustered the Senate committee resolution, and then we wouldn't be having this discussion.

Having an opinion has nothing to do with fairness.

 

You mean like the democrats who turned the investigation into a circus?

Having both sides adequately represented does.

 

this is testimony without equal representation and cross examination...

oh and did I add... unconstitutional...

Let an American lawyer and former law professor known for his work in U.S. constitutional law and American criminal law tell you how the report has no legal standing... it violates the separation of powers...

Alan Dershowitz on Jan. 6 Committee's Trump criminal referral: This is unconstitutional

It violates 3 provisions of the constitution...

https://rumble.com/v21kvsw-alan-der...s-trump-criminal-referral-this-is-uncons.html

 

The select committee went out of their way, to an extreme, to keep their investigation above board and professional.

They did everything in their power to represent tRaitor tRumps “side” fairly and were rebuffed with refusals to appear and predictable invocations of the 5th.

 

And got so little they had to pretend that every thing was awful conflate the rioters with a Trump rally a forty minute walk away.

 

was a bipartisan report