the leadership of the NRA has some bums,. I have said that for years, but the NRA's positions on gun issues is not built on the seething lie that the anti gun movement is built on. The NRA doesnt have to hide its motivations or its agenda. The anti gun movement does
Errr - we ARE talking about the same NRA aren’t we? https://vpc.org/investigating-the-gun-lobby/blood-money/ Follow the money
Of course...the official numbers from Mexico are, at best, suspect. CCW permit holders are the most law-abiding people in the country. Aside from traffic tickets, they commit fewer crimes than POLICE OFFICERS. F-troop has a long history of rewriting laws by fiat.
Compared to 30 years ago, gun ownership is WAY up. WITHOUT looking it up, what do you think are the violent crime rates in 1993 and 2022?
The fact you are starting with a vetted examined group should mean that you do have a very low rate of criminal activity, however it does not prevent them from committing gun crime https://concealedcarrykillers.org/
Numbers of guns is not correlative with numbers of gun owners plus there are other factors besides gun ownership which can impact on crime rates
Wow. These ridiculous, Draconian, tyrannical blue state gun laws make me so happy I retired to Texas. TEXAS!!! WHERE FREEDOM LIVES!!
And the freedom to die Did you know that America is the only place in the industrialised nations where children have to do “active shooter” drills?
yeah, that’s exactly not the point. I said take the guns from the bad guys, let the good guys have more guns. There’s 400 million here already. Do you understand the math? Step 1 get the guns from bad guys.
I am not surprised you do not have an answer to the question. As you know, you cannot demonstrate the necessary relationship - the cause and effect - between more guns and more gun deaths All you can offer is the claim that correlation proves causation, which you know is not true. Thus, your statement is false, and you knew it was false when you made it.
You cannot demonstrate your claimed necessary relationship between an increase in the number of guns and an increase in the number of gun-related crime.
Your attempt to change the subject away from a point you cannot support is a concession of that point.
You continue to make assertions without any supporting data. That kind of a response usually suggest a running-away-from-facts person. One that has nothing to dispute the facts but wants to not make any concessions to the data given. It is a sad sight.