Think it through? Maybe you should do that. We have five times the homicides per 100k than the UK. Violent crime is associated with poverty. Their poverty rate is 20% ours is 11%. They don’t have guns. The irrational solution for our violent crime is to make guns easier to access. An arms race between legal and illegal guns is what you want. That logic didn’t work with nuclear arms and it will not make anyone safer.
More people are dying from synthetic drug overdoses than from gun violence in the US. People have easy access to illegally made fentanyl and opioids. When will you fix that? A start could be to close our porous borders and stop denying that it's not a big problem. Make it tougher for the drug cartels and impoverish migrants they use as their mules to get their product across. A product that has killed! Another idea you might want to ponder is to keep people in jail for breaking the law! Maybe you take your own advice and think it through. In 2020 more people died from drugs than all fire-armed related deaths. More than 56,000 people died from overdoses involving synthetic opioids (see source below) in 2020 whereas according to the CDC, 44,222 was recorded for all gun related deaths, and that figure includes murder, unintentional or accidental death and suicides. The FBI also shows more people were killed by knives than by rifles in 2020. FBI data shows over 2.5X people were killed by knives than rifles in 2020 (lawenforcementtoday.com) Maybe we should ban knives? My point. There is much to take issue with when we see high numbers of our population fall to what many of us see as senseless violence but why the extreme outrage over guns? Fentanyl | Opioids | CDC
because the jihad against guns is essentially a jihad against white middle class conservative Christian Males-a point NR made in an influential argument that the NRA is a surrogate for those people and every group that sees such men as their political enemy has adopted gun control as a weapon.
No, you were banned because you constantly broke the rules. Wanting to file a lawsuit...wow, that is the most hilarious/pathetic thing you have ever done.
LOL-the mods changed the rules because I outsmarted them. and we all know it. IT would have been fun to depose of few of those scumbags and then nail them with a perjury charge, but then again not worth the money. Do you have anything useful to contribute to this thread.
You must really miss TD. Maybe you should ask him out on a . Better ask him his pronouns first though.
I was hoping he'd post the same inane bullshit here, where we can take it apart without biased scumbags like a sociopathic fowl protecting what he posts. No such luck
Thank you for the fat, hanging curveball I just launched into the upper deck: compared to 1995, crime is way DOWN. (Indeed: violent crime in the US peaked in the mid-90s.) Violent crime is down nearly half. This despite a MASSIVE increase in gun ownership.
Gun control is predicated on the assumption that a woman, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose is preferable to that same woman explaining to a Police Officer how the attempted rapist got that bullet hole in his head.
I think you have missed the point of the OP. This is not about CRIME but about deaths caused by guns. Guns being the problem (not crime).
Yeah, sanity and reality are not traits the Republicans represent or know much about. the memes are a factual representation of what is happening in our schools and what arming teachers would likely bring on. Show me anything that would dispute the memes!!!!!! If we are to arm the teachers, we do need to arm the school bus drivers, the PTA members meetings with their kids at school, the coaches at the ball games, etc., etc., etc. If we arm the teachers, why wouldn't they use that power to get what they personally want (higher wages, better jobs, more security for themselves, etc.? That is all human nature. You did not know that?
Yeah, mirror, mirror. The difference lies in the fact that some look in the mirror and see more and some (like myself) looked in the mirror over 55 years ago and did not like what he saw and realized he had to change. Some never change or learn.
I did admit to what I stated, regarding not explaining the numbers had conditions, was wrong. I was a MAN about it (if you look, you will see it in black and white in 2 different posts). I have not seen you be a man about admitting the fact that we have a problems with guns in the U.S. Are you being a man about it?
before 1977 the NRA was about sporting rifles and hunting, after 1977 the NRA has been supporting gun business owners and more profit at the expense of the general public, guns have taken on a religious fever and thinking gone out the window, we can all thank the NRA lobby