Women’s rights have gone ‘too far’, say majority of Gen Z and millennials, study shows

You are the one running in circles.

You were not so specific when opening up this issue and you were proven wrong

 

That ended long ago

Keep living in the past and ignore the present

 

Yes, men do commit most of the crimes. And there is one race that commits more than any other race.

 

Sure I do. Every thread that talks about women's rights. You always take the woman's stance and never once talk about the men's stance. Such as this thread where you use ad homs against men.

You referenced "centuries". Guess so that you could move goal posts whenever you wanted. Very well. Let's confine this to just the United States. That way you can ignore the rest of history.

You're right, in the US it took a couple of centuries for women to be able to vote. But then again they never had to go to war either. In fact they still do not have to sign up for selective service (the draft) where as men do.

Not sure what you're talking about with patents. The first woman patent holder was Mary Dixon Kies in 1809.

As for getting loans, yep that happened. Not anymore. In the mean time courts award custody of children to women 80-90% of the time and women get roughly 14% more in child support than men who actually won custody of the children.

Isn't the idea of the feminist movement about equal rights and treatment between men and women? If the answer is "yes" then rather than using ad homs against men in this thread, you should be contributing to the discussion of making sure there is equal treatment between men and women. But you won't do that will you? Proving the OP correct.

 

Thus far you have been unable to disprove a single item

 

I have indeed.

Hence your continued spin

 

Why is it ok to condemn a particular race but not a particular sex?

 

]

That does NOT mean it didn't exist...(as late as the 70's women were denied bank loans because they were women...)

Keep ignoring the past if it makes you feel better but that doesn't mean it didn't exist..





WOW, The Royal Male believes he has had His Rights messed with and listen to him CRY.....

Notice how he ignores the history of the world and the blatant unfairness and lack of rights women endured for centuries....

But he is ""WAAA WAAA WAA , those naughty women are so much stronger than we want them to be ! "

LOLOLOL

And I don't give a flying .****... about any replies

 

WOW, The Royal Male believes he has had His Rights messed with and listen to him CRY.....

Notice how he ignores the history of the world and the blatant unfairness and lack of rights women endured for centuries....

But he is ""WAAA WAAA WAA , those naughty women are so much stronger than we want them to be ! "

LOLOLOL

And I don't give a flying .****... about any replies

 

When all you can do is use ad homs and quote/paste what you've already said...it shows that you have no argument. All you've done is prove the OP correct.

 

But they aren't though. The only reason feminism exists because there's men that let it. The second they stop it's over.

 

That fact that it existed is irrelevant.

There is no such history as you claim.

Your description is a lie and proven so

 

This is kind of the way this whole thing happened it's all based on attempting to shame men.

When people try this with you just tell him I'm not ashamed and I won't be. It does pluck the fangs from that particular viper, but more importantly if you're a man and you're respectable man it makes you appear more confident and that is everything when referring to men if they don't allow themselves to be shamed all of this ends.

This is the predominant facet of so-called women's rights these days. I would say it's the only facet of it. If you don't want to date a woman with kids that are yours you're intimidated or your child. If you don't want to date a fat woman because you're not attracted to her well it's not really because you're unattracted to her it's because you're a follower and you listen to your friends and you would be humiliated if they knew you dated a fat woman. If you don't want to date a woman in her 40s that's like a CEO of some business it's because you're intimidated by her.

All of these things are directed at there's something wrong with men and, I think they need to take a page out of the gay mans book and there's nothing wrong with me. This is just the way I am I like what I like and I don't like what I don't like and if you have a problem with that it's your problem.

That would put a very fast end to all of this. That's why they freak out so hard about mgtow and whatever they call incels. These things are threats.

 

This is an attempt to shame men who stand up for their rights. I like your response to it but I think there's something to be said for declaring I won't be ashamed.

 

Women were happier than men before all this feminist nonsense . Now the men are happier than women.

I have no complaints.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
WOW, The Royal Male believes he has had His Rights messed with and listen to him CRY.....

Notice how he ignores the history of the world and the blatant unfairness and lack of rights women endured for centuries....

But he is ""WAAA WAAA WAA , those naughty women are so much stronger than we want them to be ! "

LOLOLOL

And I don't give a flying .****... about any replies

You have NO way of knowing how all women feel....

LOL, then you haven't read all the whining in this thread

 

I read the sociological studies .

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
WOW, The Royal Male believes he has had His Rights messed with and listen to him CRY.....

Notice how he ignores the history of the world and the blatant unfairness and lack of rights women endured for centuries....

But he is ""WAAA WAAA WAA , those naughty women are so much stronger than we want them to be ! "

LOLOLOL

And I don't give a flying .****... about any replies


You have NO way of knowing how all women feel....






LOL, then you haven't read all the whining in this thread

LOL, then you haven't read all the whining in this thread Proving your statement ""Now the men are happier than women."...is wrong ...

 

Your total disrespect for the people who have fought for you and your country is quite sickening to NORMAL people......

To purposely deny what women in the military have done is misogyny at it's best....and is your problem ( a deep, deep, sick problem),. not their's...

 

You have heard about the mental ealth crisis among teenage girls?

 

LoL pure fantasy.

It's all "females are just as capable as males" until some Russian tanks roll over a border or the car breaks down.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
WOW, The Royal Male believes he has had His Rights messed with and listen to him CRY.....

Notice how he ignores the history of the world and the blatant unfairness and lack of rights women endured for centuries....

But he is ""WAAA WAAA WAA , those naughty women are so much stronger than we want them to be ! "

LOLOLOL

And I don't give a flying .****... about any replies


You have NO way of knowing how all women feel....






LOL, then you haven't read all the whining in this thread



girls

LOL, then you haven't read all the whining in this thread Proving your statement ""Now the men are happier than women."...is wrong ...

LOL, here we go again with the CRAP about how "if women have equal rights they will get sad and it is the ONLY thing that makes women sad ".

Ya, some think treating women like humans makes them sad....that is one way to "keep women in line and obedient"...


But , especially in this thread, it sure seems to make MEN unhappy

 

Not really true.

Liberals can only survive in 1st world nations.

It's the waste by-product of freedom.

 

Bull****.

https://www.domestic-violence-law.c...n-or-men-who-usually-instigates-domestic-vio/

According to the Center for Disease Control (CDC), almost 24% of all relationships experience some level of violence. 50% of domestic violence cases involve mutual violence. In the other 50% of domestic violence cases, the violence was non-mutual.

In relationships where violence was non-mutual almost 70% of the violence was perpetrated by the woman. In other words, in almost 7 out of 10 cases of mutual violence, the batterer was a female.

A 2006 study of physical and psychological aggression between 453 cohabiting couples with young children indicated that there were instances of minor aggression initiated by men in 23.3% of the cases, while there were instances of minor aggression ignited by women in 33.8 % of the cases.

So, What Can We Conclude About Domestic Violence?
From these findings, we can safely conclude the following:

1. The rate of female-on-male violence is equal to the rate of male-on-female violence.
2. Domestic violence has nothing to do with gender.
3. Society is misinformed about the nature of domestic violence
4. Domestic violence prosecution is based on myth rather than reality

https://aliesq.medium.com/extensive...ore-than-men-men-under-report-it-3bbaa4fbec9d