Rand Paul tweets NY DA ‘should be put in jail’

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Think for myself, Mar 22, 2023.

  1. Pro_Line_FL

    Pro_Line_FL Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2018
    Messages:
    26,119
    Likes Received:
    14,206
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Its the middle ages mindset where it was considered treason to speak bad about the king (who was above the law)
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2023
  2. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Which I exercised.
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  3. WhoDatPhan78

    WhoDatPhan78 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2021
    Messages:
    8,497
    Likes Received:
    5,065
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, the court disagrees with you, otherwise they wouldn't even have seated a grand jury.
     
  4. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So what exactly does Cohen have to do with the case?
     
  5. WhoDatPhan78

    WhoDatPhan78 Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2021
    Messages:
    8,497
    Likes Received:
    5,065
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not here to catch you up on what is going on.

    He's not being prosecuted for campaign finance violations. You need to inform yourself.
     
  6. Sleep Monster

    Sleep Monster Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2019
    Messages:
    13,881
    Likes Received:
    9,414
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They can't do squat. Congress has zero power when it comes to locally elected DAs. This is nothing but the bleating of Trump's steeple in the GOP, aimed at an audience of one.

    This is how House Republicans plan to proceed while they hold the majority: nothing for we the people, as they have no platform other than to investigate, intimidate, and "go after" Trump's enemies, using our tax dollars to do so.
     
  7. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    A GJ doesn't prove the validity of charges.
     
    Turtledude likes this.
  8. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wasn't he Trump's personal lawyer/fixer?
     
  9. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Look
    :below:
     
  10. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It does recommend prosecution based on the existence of evidence.
     
  11. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Man, for claiming to refuse to waste your time, you sure seem to do that.
     
    Hey Now likes this.
  12. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Probable cause is not proof.
     
    Turtledude and Trixare4kids like this.
  13. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Correct. You are correct, and also note I never claimed it was, so your statement seems to be a bit of a strawman.
     
  14. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,556
    Likes Received:
    11,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IF you actually read your O/P source, you'd admit that Rand Paul has a point when he said, "A Trump indictment would be a disgusting abuse of power."
     
    Turtledude and Steve N like this.
  15. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I would not admit that, because that would be a lie. Rand Paul has no point other than to, apparently successfully, rile up the little MAGABrownshirts.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2023
  16. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You spoke of evidence presented to a GJ being indicative of a crime having been committed.
     
    Trixare4kids likes this.
  17. Izzy

    Izzy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2022
    Messages:
    9,630
    Likes Received:
    5,590
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    It's all in Cohen's plea deal about paying Stormy and Karen McDougal.

    snip:

    "COHEN caused and made the payments described herein in order to influence the 2016 presidential election. In so doing, he coordinated with one or more members of the campaign, including through meetings and phone calls, about the fact, nature, and timing of the payments. As a result of the payments solicited and made by COHEN, neither Woman-1 nor Woman-2 spoke to the press prior to the election."

    https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/michael-cohen-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax#:~:text=COHEN, 51, of NEW YORK,making an excessive campaign contribution.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2023
    Quantum Nerd likes this.
  18. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,997
    Likes Received:
    37,720
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don’t understand how charges that don’t exist yet, can be found criminal or unconstitutional before you even know what they are.
    Is it that any charges against trump can only be criminal and unconstitutional?
     
    Quantum Nerd and LiveUninhibited like this.
  19. LiveUninhibited

    LiveUninhibited Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    9,684
    Likes Received:
    2,991
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I think the point is that not enough is even known, pre-indictment, to even judge the merits of what is to be done, let alone the facts that are known to DA that are not publicly known... so Rand Paul is just being a crazy hack as usual.
     
  20. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    That's a point worth considering. Never ending questions are not - especially when a person has access to a search engine by which they can use to further a discussion.
     
  21. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,556
    Likes Received:
    11,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rand Paul has no point other than to, apparently successfully, rile up the little MAGABrownshirts.

    I suppose you would call esteemed legal expert, Jonathan Turley, a liar too?

    Oh look, Tfm, Rand Paul agrees with Turley.

    Rand Paul on Twitter: ".@JonathanTurley on the NY DA’s political prosecution of Trump: “Well, there's a host of legal principles designed to keep this from happening— that you're taking something that has a statute of limitations of two years and trying to bring it back to life seven years later.”" / Twitter

    It's crystal clear that the above crap is being promoted by extremists from the anti-Trump brigade.
     
    Steve N and Overitall like this.
  22. flyboy56

    flyboy56 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2013
    Messages:
    15,580
    Likes Received:
    5,446
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If Bragg does indict Trump the question Bragg will need to answer is why he waited until after Trump declared his candidacy for president. His decision could very well fall under election interference. This is what Rand believes it is and that is a crime. It’s ironic that Bragg might indict Trump for election interference.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2023
    mngam, Steve N and Overitall like this.
  23. Trixare4kids

    Trixare4kids Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    8,556
    Likes Received:
    11,638
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If Trump is indicted, this sets a dangerous precedent for our country----prosecuting political opponents for gain.
     
    Wild Bill Kelsoe likes this.
  24. Overitall

    Overitall Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2021
    Messages:
    12,210
    Likes Received:
    11,567
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The evidence is clear (video interviews where he admits his #1 priority is to get Trump) that this is a political hit job, designed to influence the election 2024. He may get an indictment, but what he really wants is that mug shot. That alone could have an influence on the election.
     
    Last edited: Mar 22, 2023
    Trixare4kids and Steve N like this.
  25. Think for myself

    Think for myself Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,277
    Likes Received:
    4,601
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yeah, a precedent that even MAGA folks are subject to the law.
     

Share This Page